28325, Calypso, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28325, Calypso, North Carolina is 30 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 70.07 percent of the residents in 28325 has some form of health insurance. 32.67 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 47.88 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28325 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 63 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 13 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28325. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 100 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,395 health care providers accessible to residents in 28325, Calypso, North Carolina.

**Asthma Score Analysis: Physicians and Primary Care in Calypso, NC (ZIP Code 28325)**

Analyzing healthcare access and quality, particularly concerning asthma management, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) in Calypso, North Carolina (ZIP code 28325), and assess their capacity to manage asthma patients. We will explore physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, investigate telemedicine adoption, and examine the availability of mental health resources, all crucial factors in providing comprehensive asthma care.

The cornerstone of effective asthma management is readily accessible primary care. In Calypso, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time per patient, and potentially, a diminished quality of care. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access, allowing for more frequent check-ups, proactive management, and improved patient outcomes. Publicly available data from sources like the US Department of Health & Human Services or the North Carolina Medical Board is essential to determine the precise ratio within the specified ZIP code. This data will be the foundation for understanding the overall accessibility of primary care.

Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive. This involves looking beyond simple physician counts. We need to assess the practices' infrastructure, patient reviews, and the range of services offered. Practices with dedicated asthma clinics, specialized equipment (like spirometry), and a multidisciplinary approach (including nurses, respiratory therapists, and potentially, allergists) would be considered higher-scoring. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education, offering resources on asthma triggers, medication management, and emergency action plans, also contribute to a higher ranking. Furthermore, the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) that facilitate efficient communication and data sharing is a positive indicator.

Telemedicine has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas like Calypso. The availability of virtual consultations can significantly improve access to care, particularly for patients with chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine can enable remote monitoring of symptoms, medication adjustments, and follow-up appointments, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits. Practices that offer telemedicine options, particularly for established patients, would receive a higher score. The ease of use of the telemedicine platform, the availability of technical support, and the integration of telemedicine with the practice's EHR system are all factors to consider.

The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial component of comprehensive asthma care. Practices that have in-house mental health professionals, or readily available referrals to mental health specialists, would be ranked more favorably. This integration of mental health services acknowledges the holistic needs of asthma patients, leading to better overall health outcomes. The presence of support groups or educational programs addressing the psychological aspects of asthma would also be a positive factor.

Specific practices within 28325 need to be evaluated. The analysis should investigate each practice's website, patient reviews (from sources like Healthgrades, Vitals, or Google Reviews), and publicly available information about their services. For example, a practice that actively promotes its asthma management program, offers extended hours, and provides patient education materials would be highly ranked. Conversely, a practice with limited online presence, negative patient reviews, and a lack of specialized asthma services would receive a lower score. The analysis must consider factors like the experience and specialization of the physicians, the availability of ancillary staff, and the overall patient experience.

The evaluation of primary care availability in Calypso must also consider the broader healthcare landscape. This includes the proximity to hospitals, specialist clinics (like pulmonologists and allergists), and pharmacies. The availability of emergency services is also a critical factor. Patients with poorly controlled asthma may require frequent emergency room visits, so the accessibility of these services is a significant determinant of overall care quality. The presence of community resources, such as free or low-cost asthma education programs or support groups, also enhances the quality of care.

The evaluation process should involve a systematic approach. Each factor (physician-to-patient ratio, practice infrastructure, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the broader healthcare landscape) should be assigned a weighted score. This weighting should reflect the relative importance of each factor in contributing to effective asthma management. The final asthma score for each practice would be calculated based on the sum of the weighted scores. This scoring system provides a clear and objective assessment of the quality and accessibility of asthma care in Calypso.

The overall goal of this analysis is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare resources available to asthma patients in Calypso, North Carolina. This information can be used by patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare, by healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement, and by policymakers to allocate resources effectively. The analysis should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, such as the addition of new practices, the adoption of new technologies, and the availability of new resources.

To further enhance your understanding of healthcare access and resource distribution, we encourage you to explore the power of visualization. CartoChrome maps offer a dynamic and interactive way to analyze geographic data, including physician locations, hospital proximity, and socioeconomic factors that impact health outcomes. Visualize the data. Gain a deeper understanding. Explore CartoChrome maps today.