28386, Shannon, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28386, Shannon, North Carolina is 39 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 77.86 percent of the residents in 28386 has some form of health insurance. 45.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 40.47 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28386 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,342 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28386. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 662 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,412 health care providers accessible to residents in 28386, Shannon, North Carolina.

**Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28386 and Primary Care Availability in Shannon, North Carolina**

This analysis delves into the availability and quality of primary care, with a specific focus on asthma management, within ZIP code 28386 (which encompasses Shannon, North Carolina) and its surrounding areas. We'll examine physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and explore the presence of mental health resources, all crucial components of comprehensive asthma care. This analysis aims to provide a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape and identify areas for potential improvement.

The foundation of effective asthma management lies in accessible and competent primary care. In the context of Shannon, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. While precise figures fluctuate, rural areas often face challenges in attracting and retaining physicians. A lower physician-to-patient ratio, meaning fewer doctors per resident, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially poorer asthma control. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, the U.S. Census Bureau, and the American Medical Association would need to be consulted to determine the exact ratio for this specific ZIP code. This data is crucial for understanding the baseline level of access.

Beyond mere numbers, the quality of primary care hinges on the practices themselves. Some practices will undoubtedly distinguish themselves through their commitment to asthma management. These "standout practices" are likely to employ a multi-faceted approach. This includes a proactive stance on patient education, providing comprehensive asthma action plans, and ensuring regular follow-up appointments. They will likely utilize evidence-based guidelines for asthma treatment, including the appropriate use of inhaled corticosteroids, bronchodilators, and other medications. Staff training in asthma management, including proper inhaler technique instruction, is another key indicator of a practice’s dedication to asthma care. These practices might also participate in quality improvement initiatives, tracking patient outcomes and making adjustments to their care protocols as needed.

Telemedicine has emerged as a powerful tool for expanding healthcare access, particularly in rural settings. Its adoption within ZIP code 28386 is a significant factor in assessing the overall quality of care. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, medication refills, and even remote monitoring of asthma symptoms. Practices that embrace telemedicine can potentially overcome geographical barriers, reducing the need for patients to travel long distances for routine checkups. The availability of telemedicine, however, is only part of the equation. The ease of use, the technical infrastructure, and the patient's comfort level with technology are all crucial factors in determining the effectiveness of telemedicine initiatives. Information on telemedicine adoption can be gathered from practice websites, insurance provider directories, and potentially through local healthcare networks.

Asthma often co-exists with other health conditions, including mental health disorders. The presence of mental health resources within the primary care setting is therefore essential. Patients with asthma who also experience anxiety or depression may find their asthma symptoms exacerbated. Integrated mental health services, whether through on-site therapists, partnerships with mental health professionals, or referrals to specialized care, can significantly improve patient outcomes. The availability of these resources is an important aspect of a comprehensive asthma care assessment. This information can be gleaned from practice websites, community health directories, and potentially through direct contact with local healthcare providers.

Specific practices within the area warrant closer examination. Are there any practices that have earned recognition for their asthma care, perhaps through patient satisfaction surveys or awards? Do any practices specialize in pulmonology or allergy care, providing a higher level of expertise? Are there any community health centers that offer affordable care options? These are all important questions to consider when evaluating the overall quality of care. Direct observation and patient reviews can provide valuable insights into the patient experience.

Furthermore, the availability of specialized services, such as pulmonary function testing (PFT), is essential for accurate asthma diagnosis and monitoring. The presence of these diagnostic tools within primary care practices or nearby specialist offices contributes to the overall accessibility of asthma care. The ability to quickly and accurately assess lung function is a critical component of effective asthma management.

The socioeconomic factors of the community also play a role. The prevalence of asthma is often higher in low-income communities, and access to healthcare can be limited. The availability of insurance coverage, the affordability of medications, and the presence of social support networks are all important considerations. Community outreach programs that address asthma triggers, such as mold and dust mites, can also improve patient outcomes.

The healthcare landscape in Shannon is dynamic. The analysis is not a static snapshot but rather a starting point for ongoing assessment. Regular updates are crucial to reflect changes in physician availability, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The information gathered can be used to advocate for improved healthcare access and to identify areas where resources are most needed.

In conclusion, the quality of asthma care in ZIP code 28386 is a complex issue influenced by physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. A thorough assessment requires a multi-faceted approach, including data analysis, direct observation, and patient feedback. The findings of such an analysis can inform strategies to improve healthcare access and outcomes for individuals living with asthma in Shannon and its surrounding areas.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and resource availability, consider exploring the interactive maps provided by CartoChrome. Their mapping tools can help you visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare environment in your community.