28454, Maple Hill, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28454, Maple Hill, North Carolina is 44 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 83.01 percent of the residents in 28454 has some form of health insurance. 40.24 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.24 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28454 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 601 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28454. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 341 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,071 health care providers accessible to residents in 28454, Maple Hill, North Carolina.

The assessment of asthma care within ZIP code 28454, encompassing the Maple Hill area, requires a multifaceted approach. An “Asthma Score,” while not a standardized metric, can be constructed through an analysis of various factors influencing patient outcomes. This analysis will delve into the availability of primary care physicians, the physician-to-patient ratio, the adoption of telemedicine, the presence of mental health resources, and highlight any standout practices within the community.

Primary care availability forms the bedrock of asthma management. Regular check-ups, medication adjustments, and patient education are all crucial components of effective asthma control. Determining the number of primary care physicians actively practicing within 28454 is the first step. Data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and local hospital systems can provide this information. Furthermore, it’s essential to ascertain whether these physicians are accepting new patients, particularly those with asthma. A shortage of accessible primary care providers can lead to delayed diagnoses, suboptimal treatment, and increased emergency room visits.

The physician-to-patient ratio provides a critical gauge of access. A high ratio, meaning fewer physicians per capita, suggests potential difficulties in securing timely appointments and receiving adequate care. Public health data, combined with population estimates for 28454, allows for the calculation of this ratio. Comparing this ratio to state and national averages reveals whether the community faces a relative shortage of primary care physicians. Areas with a higher concentration of pediatricians are particularly beneficial for asthma management, given the prevalence of the condition in children.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially in rural areas. Remote consultations, medication refills, and virtual asthma education sessions can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or transportation challenges. Identifying which primary care practices in 28454 offer telemedicine services is essential. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters that can transmit data to physicians, further enhances the effectiveness of telemedicine in asthma management. A high level of telemedicine adoption would positively influence the Asthma Score.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, yet their impact can be significant. Asthma can trigger anxiety and depression, and conversely, these mental health conditions can worsen asthma symptoms. The presence of mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, within the primary care practices or readily accessible in the community is critical. Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health providers is ideal for providing holistic care. Investigating the availability of support groups and educational programs related to asthma and mental health adds further value.

Identifying standout practices within 28454 is crucial. This involves assessing the quality of care provided by individual practices. Factors to consider include patient satisfaction scores, asthma control test results, rates of emergency room visits and hospitalizations for asthma, and adherence to national asthma guidelines. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education, proactive management strategies, and strong patient-physician communication would earn high marks. Examining the availability of asthma educators and respiratory therapists within these practices is also beneficial.

To construct an Asthma Score, each of these factors can be assigned a weighted value based on their relative importance. For example, primary care availability and the physician-to-patient ratio might receive higher weights than telemedicine adoption, although the latter's significance is rapidly increasing. The presence of mental health resources and standout practices would also contribute significantly to the overall score. The final score would then provide a comprehensive assessment of the asthma care landscape in Maple Hill.

Data collection is paramount. Publicly available resources, such as the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and local hospital systems, can provide valuable information. Direct outreach to primary care practices within 28454, including surveys and interviews, is essential for gathering practice-specific data. This data collection effort should be ongoing to ensure the Asthma Score remains current and reflects changes in the healthcare landscape.

The analysis should also consider any unique challenges faced by the community. For instance, environmental factors such as air quality, pollen counts, and the prevalence of allergens can significantly impact asthma control. Addressing these environmental factors through public health initiatives and patient education is crucial. The socioeconomic characteristics of the population, including income levels and access to health insurance, can also influence asthma outcomes.

The Asthma Score is not just a number; it’s a tool for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of asthma care in Maple Hill. This understanding can inform strategies to improve patient outcomes. It can also guide policy decisions, such as the allocation of resources and the development of targeted interventions. Regular reassessment of the Asthma Score is crucial to track progress and identify areas where further improvement is needed.

The final Asthma Score should be presented in a clear and concise format, summarizing the key findings and highlighting areas of excellence and areas that require attention. The analysis should include specific recommendations for improvement, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, and promoting collaboration between primary care and mental health providers.

This comprehensive analysis, while not a definitive “Asthma Score” in the traditional sense, offers a detailed overview of the asthma care landscape in Maple Hill. The insights gained can be valuable for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike.
The ability to visualize this data geographically, identifying the locations of primary care physicians, the distribution of asthma cases, and the availability of resources, is crucial for effective planning and intervention. CartoChrome maps offer the ideal platform for this visualization.

Ready to transform your data into actionable insights? Explore the power of geographic data visualization. **Contact CartoChrome maps today to learn how you can map and analyze asthma care in your community.**