28515, Bayboro, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28515, Bayboro, North Carolina is 36 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 69.62 percent of the residents in 28515 has some form of health insurance. 39.55 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 44.40 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28515 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 491 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28515. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 671 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 119 health care providers accessible to residents in 28515, Bayboro, North Carolina.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Bayboro, NC (ZIP Code 28515)

Analyzing the availability and quality of asthma care in Bayboro, North Carolina (ZIP Code 28515) requires a multi-faceted approach, evaluating not just the number of physicians, but also their specialization, the accessibility of care, and the integration of supportive services. This analysis aims to provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, considering key factors that impact asthma management within the community.

The foundation of any asthma score rests on the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). Bayboro, a relatively small community, likely faces challenges related to physician-to-patient ratios. While precise figures fluctuate, a limited number of PCPs could strain the system, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to preventative care. This is especially critical for asthma patients, who require regular check-ups and ongoing management. A low physician-to-patient ratio would negatively impact the Asthma Score.

Beyond the raw number of PCPs, specialization plays a vital role. While PCPs can manage mild to moderate asthma, patients with more severe or complex cases often require the expertise of pulmonologists or allergists. The presence or absence of these specialists within or near Bayboro significantly impacts the quality of care. If patients must travel long distances to see a specialist, it adds a significant barrier to effective asthma management, thereby lowering the Asthma Score.

The accessibility of care extends beyond the availability of physicians. Factors such as insurance acceptance, office hours, and the ability to accommodate urgent appointments are crucial. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans and offer flexible appointment scheduling are more accessible and contribute positively to the Asthma Score. Conversely, practices with limited availability or restrictive insurance policies would negatively affect the score.

Telemedicine adoption represents a modern approach to enhancing asthma care accessibility. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with their physicians remotely, facilitating medication refills, monitoring symptoms, and receiving educational support. Practices that embrace telemedicine can provide more convenient and timely care, particularly for patients with mobility issues or those living in geographically isolated areas. The degree of telemedicine integration would positively influence the Asthma Score.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked, yet critical, component of asthma management. Asthma can be a chronic and stressful condition, potentially leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health services, either within primary care practices or through referrals to external providers, is essential for comprehensive asthma care. Practices that integrate mental health support, or have strong referral networks, would contribute positively to the Asthma Score.

To identify standout practices within Bayboro, a deeper dive into specific characteristics is necessary. Practices that prioritize patient education, offering asthma management classes, providing personalized action plans, and utilizing electronic health records for efficient care coordination would be considered high-performing. These practices would likely demonstrate better patient outcomes and contribute positively to the overall Asthma Score.

Evaluating the quality of care also involves assessing the use of evidence-based guidelines and best practices. Practices that adhere to national guidelines for asthma management, including regular lung function testing, medication adjustments based on severity, and patient education on trigger avoidance, would receive higher marks. The consistent application of these practices would directly translate to improved patient outcomes and a higher Asthma Score.

The Asthma Score for Bayboro would also be influenced by the availability of ancillary services. Access to respiratory therapists, pharmacies with asthma medication expertise, and support groups can significantly improve patient outcomes. The presence of these resources within the community, or in close proximity, would positively impact the Asthma Score.

The impact of environmental factors, such as air quality, on asthma management cannot be ignored. While this analysis focuses on healthcare access, the local environment plays a crucial role in triggering asthma symptoms. Communities with poor air quality may require more intensive asthma management strategies, potentially placing a greater burden on healthcare resources. This factor would indirectly affect the Asthma Score.

Analyzing the Asthma Score is an ongoing process. Regular monitoring of physician availability, the adoption of new technologies, and the integration of supportive services is crucial. The Asthma Score is not a static measure; it should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.

The creation of a comprehensive Asthma Score for Bayboro requires a detailed data gathering process. This involves collecting information from various sources, including physician directories, insurance providers, healthcare facilities, and patient surveys. The data should be analyzed to identify strengths and weaknesses in the asthma care system.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Bayboro, and to easily assess the proximity of physicians, specialists, pharmacies, and other resources, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can visually display this data, offering a powerful tool for understanding the distribution of healthcare resources and identifying potential gaps in care.