28527, Ernul, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28527, Ernul, North Carolina is 62 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 88.84 percent of the residents in 28527 has some form of health insurance. 46.51 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.44 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28527 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 180 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 8 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28527. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 382 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,909 health care providers accessible to residents in 28527, Ernul, North Carolina.

## Asthma Score Analysis: ZIP Code 28527 and Ernul Primary Care

Analyzing healthcare access and quality within ZIP code 28527, encompassing Ernul, North Carolina, necessitates a multi-faceted approach. We must consider the prevalence of asthma, the availability of primary care physicians, the physician-to-patient ratio, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. This analysis will provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, reflecting the overall environment for asthma sufferers in this specific geographic area.

The initial step involves understanding the demographic profile of Ernul and the surrounding areas within 28527. This includes age distribution, socioeconomic factors, and the known prevalence of asthma. Public health data, coupled with local community surveys, can help determine the specific asthma burden within the population. This baseline data informs the weighting of subsequent factors in our "Asthma Score."

Primary care physician (PCP) availability is a critical component. A low PCP-to-patient ratio can hinder timely diagnosis, treatment, and ongoing management of asthma. We must identify the number of practicing PCPs within the ZIP code and calculate the ratio based on the estimated population. A higher ratio, indicating fewer patients per physician, is generally favorable for asthma patients, ensuring easier access to care and allowing for more personalized attention.

Beyond simple numbers, the quality of primary care is crucial. This involves assessing the practices' adherence to asthma treatment guidelines, the availability of asthma education programs, and the ability to provide comprehensive care, including referrals to specialists when needed. We can evaluate this by examining patient satisfaction surveys, practice accreditation, and the presence of certified asthma educators within the practices.

Telemedicine adoption presents both opportunities and challenges. For asthma patients, telemedicine can facilitate remote monitoring of symptoms, medication adjustments, and virtual follow-up appointments. However, the effectiveness of telemedicine hinges on reliable internet access and the patient's comfort level with technology. We must investigate the extent of telemedicine integration within local primary care practices, including the types of services offered and the accessibility for all patients.

Mental health resources are increasingly recognized as integral to asthma management. Asthma can exacerbate anxiety and depression, and these conditions, in turn, can worsen asthma symptoms. The availability of mental health services, either within primary care practices or through referrals, is therefore a crucial factor. The "Asthma Score" should reflect the presence of mental health professionals, the integration of mental health screening, and the availability of resources to address the psychological impact of asthma.

Standout practices deserve special recognition. These are the clinics or individual physicians who demonstrate exceptional commitment to asthma care. This might include practices with specialized asthma clinics, innovative approaches to patient education, or a strong focus on patient-centered care. Identifying and highlighting these practices can serve as a model for others and provide valuable information for patients seeking quality asthma care.

Evaluating the "Asthma Score" requires a nuanced approach. We can assign weighted scores to each factor – PCP-to-patient ratio, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, mental health integration, and standout practices. The weights should reflect the relative importance of each factor in contributing to a positive asthma management environment. The final "Asthma Score" will then be a composite score, reflecting the overall quality of asthma care within the designated area.

For example, a practice with a low PCP-to-patient ratio, a strong commitment to asthma education, and integrated mental health services would receive a high score. Conversely, an area with a high PCP-to-patient ratio, limited telemedicine options, and a lack of mental health resources would receive a lower score. The "Asthma Score" provides a snapshot of the current state of asthma care and can be used to identify areas for improvement.

In Ernul, the specific "Asthma Score" depends on the data collected. If, for instance, the area has a relatively high PCP-to-patient ratio, the score will be negatively impacted. However, if several practices have embraced telemedicine and integrated mental health services, the score can be partially offset. The goal is to create a comprehensive assessment that can guide patients, providers, and policymakers in improving asthma care.

The analysis also considers the challenges specific to rural areas like Ernul. These include potential transportation barriers, limited access to specialists, and the need for community-based interventions. Addressing these challenges requires a collaborative approach, involving healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government agencies. The "Asthma Score" should reflect the efforts to address these specific needs.

Furthermore, the analysis must be dynamic. Healthcare landscapes change rapidly, with new technologies, treatment guidelines, and policy changes. The "Asthma Score" should be regularly updated to reflect these changes and provide an accurate assessment of the current state of asthma care.

The final "Asthma Score" for 28527, and Ernul, will be a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers. It provides a clear and concise assessment of the asthma care environment, highlighting strengths and weaknesses. This information can be used to guide patients in selecting healthcare providers, inform providers about areas for improvement, and support policymakers in developing strategies to improve asthma care in the community.

Ultimately, improving asthma care requires a commitment to continuous improvement. This involves monitoring patient outcomes, evaluating the effectiveness of interventions, and adapting to the changing healthcare landscape. The "Asthma Score" is a starting point, a tool to guide these efforts and ultimately improve the lives of asthma sufferers in Ernul and the surrounding areas.

To further explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, physician density, and patient populations within 28527, consider using CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a visual representation of the data, helping you identify areas with limited access to care and other relevant insights.