28651, Millers Creek, North Carolina Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28651, Millers Creek, North Carolina is 23 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 87.16 percent of the residents in 28651 has some form of health insurance. 43.06 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 62.67 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28651 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,006 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28651. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,460 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 672 health care providers accessible to residents in 28651, Millers Creek, North Carolina.

Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, significantly impacts quality of life, especially in areas with environmental triggers. Assessing healthcare resources available to manage asthma is crucial. This analysis focuses on the medical landscape within ZIP Code 28651 (Millers Creek, North Carolina), evaluating the availability of primary care physicians and their approach to asthma management. The goal is to provide a comprehensive 'Asthma Score' assessment, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. Accurate data on this metric requires accessing up-to-date information from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board or the US Census Bureau, cross-referenced with insurance provider directories. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially hindering timely asthma care. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better accessibility. The analysis would need to determine the exact physician-to-patient ratio within 28651, comparing it to state and national averages to gauge the relative availability of primary care.

Standout practices are identified by evaluating several factors. These include the adoption of evidence-based asthma management guidelines, patient satisfaction scores (gleaned from surveys and online reviews), and the availability of specialized asthma education programs. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, offering personalized treatment plans and emphasizing self-management strategies, typically achieve better outcomes. A practice with a dedicated asthma nurse educator or respiratory therapist would score highly. Furthermore, a practice's commitment to preventative care, such as offering flu shots and pneumonia vaccinations, would contribute to a positive assessment.

Telemedicine adoption is becoming increasingly important, especially for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine allows patients to connect with their physicians remotely, facilitating follow-up appointments, medication adjustments, and symptom monitoring. Practices that offer telehealth services, particularly for asthma, would receive a higher score. The analysis would investigate the availability of virtual consultations, remote monitoring devices (e.g., peak flow meters with data transmission), and the use of telehealth platforms for patient education. The convenience and accessibility of telemedicine can significantly improve asthma control, particularly for patients in rural areas.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they play a crucial role. Asthma can be exacerbated by stress, anxiety, and depression. Practices that recognize the link between mental health and asthma and provide access to mental health services, either in-house or through referrals, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient care. The analysis would assess the availability of mental health professionals, the integration of mental health screening into routine asthma care, and the provision of educational materials about stress management and coping strategies. Practices that collaborate with mental health specialists to provide integrated care would be considered exemplary.

The 'Asthma Score' would be a composite measure based on the factors discussed above. Each factor would be assigned a weight based on its relative importance. The final score would reflect the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care within 28651. For example, a practice with a high physician-to-patient ratio, offering telemedicine services, and integrating mental health support would receive a higher score than a practice with limited resources. The analysis would provide a clear understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system in Millers Creek, allowing for informed decision-making by patients and healthcare providers.

To further refine the analysis, it's essential to consider the specific asthma management protocols used by each practice. This includes the types of medications prescribed, the frequency of follow-up appointments, and the use of patient education materials. The analysis would assess whether practices adhere to national guidelines for asthma management, such as those published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA). Practices that follow these guidelines, tailoring treatment plans to individual patient needs, would receive a higher score.

Furthermore, the analysis would examine the availability of specialized asthma services, such as pulmonary function testing (PFT) and allergy testing. These services are essential for diagnosing and monitoring asthma. Practices that offer these services on-site or have easy access to them would be considered more comprehensive. The analysis would also consider the availability of asthma-specific support groups and educational programs within the community. These resources can provide valuable support and information for patients and their families.

The environmental factors in Millers Creek also influence asthma management. The analysis would consider the local air quality, the prevalence of allergens, and the presence of environmental triggers. Practices that educate patients about environmental triggers and provide guidance on how to avoid them would be considered proactive. Collaboration with local environmental agencies to monitor air quality and address environmental hazards would also be a positive factor.

In conclusion, the 'Asthma Score' analysis for doctors in ZIP Code 28651 and primary care availability in Millers Creek requires a multifaceted approach. It involves assessing physician-to-patient ratios, evaluating standout practices based on evidence-based care and patient satisfaction, examining telemedicine adoption, and evaluating the integration of mental health resources. The analysis considers the specific asthma management protocols used by each practice, the availability of specialized services, and the influence of environmental factors. This comprehensive assessment provides a valuable tool for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers to improve asthma care in Millers Creek.

To visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Millers Creek, explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome. Their platform allows for the spatial analysis of healthcare resources, enabling a more nuanced understanding of accessibility and quality of care.