The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28693, Warrensville, North Carolina is 34 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.86 percent of the residents in 28693 has some form of health insurance. 40.33 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.76 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28693 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 360 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28693. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 416 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 343 health care providers accessible to residents in 28693, Warrensville, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28693, Warrensville, North Carolina
Asthma Score | 53 |
---|---|
People Score | 37 |
Provider Score | 34 |
Hospital Score | 65 |
Travel Score | 60 |
28693 | Warrensville | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing the asthma care landscape within Warrensville, North Carolina (ZIP code 28693) necessitates a multi-faceted approach, considering not only the availability of primary care physicians but also the quality of care offered, the utilization of modern technologies, and the integration of mental health resources. This analysis aims to provide a nuanced ‘Asthma Score’ assessment, recognizing the complex interplay of factors influencing patient outcomes.
The initial assessment focuses on primary care availability. Warrensville, being a rural community, likely faces challenges common to such areas. Physician-to-patient ratios are critical. A high ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments for asthma sufferers. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, combined with information from the US Census Bureau, can provide an initial estimate of these ratios. However, these figures alone don't tell the whole story.
The quality of primary care is another essential factor. This involves evaluating the practices of individual physicians and the overall infrastructure of the healthcare facilities. Are physicians board-certified in internal medicine or family medicine, the specialties most relevant to primary care? Do they have experience treating asthma patients? Are their offices equipped with the necessary diagnostic tools, such as spirometry, to accurately assess lung function? Information on physician credentials and experience can be found through online databases maintained by medical boards and professional organizations. Reviews from patients, while subjective, can also offer valuable insights into the quality of care, the responsiveness of staff, and the overall patient experience.
Identifying standout practices within the ZIP code requires a deeper dive. This could involve looking for practices that demonstrate a commitment to asthma management through specific programs or initiatives. For example, some practices might have dedicated asthma educators who provide patients with individualized training on inhaler techniques, trigger avoidance, and asthma action plans. Others might participate in quality improvement projects focused on improving asthma control rates. These practices, by demonstrating a proactive approach to asthma care, would likely receive higher scores in the ‘Asthma Score’ analysis.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly relevant, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine offers the potential to expand access to care by enabling virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and medication management. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, particularly for asthma patients, should be recognized for their efforts. This includes assessing the availability of telehealth appointments, the ease of use of the telemedicine platform, and the extent to which telemedicine is integrated into the overall care plan. Practices that utilize remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters that transmit data to the physician, would also score favorably.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they are crucial. Asthma can be a chronic condition that significantly impacts a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Primary care practices that recognize this connection and provide access to mental health services or referrals would be considered more comprehensive in their approach. This includes evaluating whether the practice has on-site mental health professionals, offers referrals to therapists or psychiatrists, or integrates mental health screening into routine asthma care.
The ‘Asthma Score’ analysis would also consider the availability of specialists. While primary care physicians are the cornerstone of asthma management, access to pulmonologists, allergists, and other specialists is essential for patients with more complex cases or uncontrolled asthma. The distance to these specialists, the ease of referral, and the availability of appointment slots all contribute to the overall score. A practice with strong referral relationships and easy access to specialized care would score higher.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the availability of educational resources for patients. Does the practice provide educational materials on asthma triggers, medication management, and self-management techniques? Are there asthma support groups or educational programs available in the community? Practices that prioritize patient education and empowerment would be recognized for their commitment to improving patient outcomes.
Finally, the analysis would incorporate data on medication adherence. Asthma medications are most effective when taken as prescribed. Practices that have strategies in place to improve medication adherence, such as medication reconciliation programs, reminder systems, or patient counseling, would be viewed favorably.
By considering all these factors, a comprehensive ‘Asthma Score’ analysis can be developed for doctors in ZIP code 28693. This score would not only reflect the availability of primary care physicians but also the quality of care, the utilization of technology, the integration of mental health resources, and the overall commitment to improving the lives of asthma patients in Warrensville. This requires a data-driven approach, combining publicly available information with insights gleaned from patient reviews, practice websites, and other sources.
To gain a visual understanding of the healthcare landscape in Warrensville and other areas, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive maps that can visualize physician locations, healthcare facility locations, and other relevant data points, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the healthcare accessibility and availability in the region. This can be a valuable tool for patients seeking care and for healthcare providers looking to improve their services.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like