The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28768, Pisgah Forest, North Carolina is 57 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 89.51 percent of the residents in 28768 has some form of health insurance. 45.22 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.68 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28768 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,348 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28768. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,310 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,154 health care providers accessible to residents in 28768, Pisgah Forest, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28768, Pisgah Forest, North Carolina
Asthma Score | 73 |
---|---|
People Score | 47 |
Provider Score | 57 |
Hospital Score | 68 |
Travel Score | 53 |
28768 | Pisgah Forest | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing healthcare access and quality, particularly concerning asthma management, necessitates a multi-faceted approach. Focusing on ZIP Code 28768 (Pisgah Forest, North Carolina) allows us to assess the availability of primary care physicians, their practices, and the resources they offer to patients, especially those managing asthma. This analysis will also consider the physician-to-patient ratio, telemedicine integration, and mental health support, ultimately culminating in a call to action for the use of CartoChrome maps.
The physician-to-patient ratio in Pisgah Forest is a crucial starting point. While precise, real-time data fluctuates, understanding the general availability of primary care physicians (PCPs) is paramount. A lower ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially hinder timely asthma management. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility, which is beneficial for individuals needing regular check-ups, medication refills, and asthma action plan adjustments. Researching local healthcare databases and contacting area hospitals and clinics provides a more accurate representation of the current PCP availability.
Evaluating the standout practices within 28768 requires looking beyond simple physician counts. We must consider the quality of care provided, patient reviews, and specialized services offered. Practices demonstrating a commitment to asthma management often employ certified asthma educators, offer comprehensive pulmonary function testing, and actively participate in asthma-related research or community outreach programs. Furthermore, practices that embrace technology, such as electronic health records (EHRs) for streamlined communication and medication management, are often better equipped to provide efficient and effective care. These practices also often emphasize patient education, empowering individuals to proactively manage their asthma.
Telemedicine adoption has significantly reshaped healthcare delivery, especially in rural areas like Pisgah Forest. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with their physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving access to care, especially for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. For asthma patients, telemedicine can facilitate medication adjustments, symptom monitoring, and education sessions. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their workflow are likely to offer more flexible appointment options and potentially improve patient adherence to treatment plans. Assessing the availability of telemedicine services within 28768, including the types of services offered and the technology used, is vital.
The often-overlooked connection between asthma and mental health warrants careful consideration. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and stress. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within primary care practices is crucial. Practices that integrate mental health screenings, offer on-site counseling, or have established referral networks with mental health professionals are better equipped to provide holistic care. Investigating the presence of these resources within the primary care landscape of Pisgah Forest is essential for a comprehensive asthma score analysis.
A robust asthma score analysis for Pisgah Forest must also consider the availability of specialized care. While primary care physicians are often the first point of contact for asthma management, access to pulmonologists (specialists in lung diseases) is essential, especially for patients with severe or uncontrolled asthma. Evaluating the proximity of pulmonologists, the ease of referral processes, and the availability of specialized asthma clinics contributes significantly to the overall score.
The assessment of asthma medication availability is another critical element. Access to affordable and readily available asthma medications, including both rescue inhalers and controller medications, directly impacts patient outcomes. Analyzing local pharmacy options, insurance coverage acceptance, and the availability of patient assistance programs for those with financial constraints is crucial. Furthermore, practices that actively assist patients in navigating medication access challenges demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive asthma care.
The role of patient education cannot be overstated. Practices that prioritize asthma education, providing patients with the knowledge and skills to self-manage their condition, often see improved outcomes. This includes education on proper inhaler technique, asthma action plan development, trigger avoidance strategies, and symptom recognition. Evaluating the educational resources offered by local practices, such as patient handouts, group education sessions, and online resources, is essential.
Finally, the overall asthma score for Pisgah Forest must incorporate community-level factors. The presence of air quality monitoring stations, the prevalence of environmental triggers like pollen and mold, and the availability of resources for addressing housing-related asthma triggers all contribute to the overall environment for asthma management. Collaborating with local health departments and environmental agencies to gather this data is vital.
In conclusion, a comprehensive asthma score analysis for doctors in ZIP Code 28768 and primary care availability in Pisgah Forest requires a multi-faceted evaluation. It encompasses physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care provided by standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, the availability of specialized care, access to medication, patient education initiatives, and community-level factors. This comprehensive assessment provides a clear picture of the healthcare landscape for asthma patients in Pisgah Forest, allowing for informed decision-making and targeted interventions to improve patient outcomes.
For a visual representation of this data and a deeper dive into the geographic distribution of resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide a powerful tool for understanding healthcare access and identifying areas where improvements are needed. Utilize CartoChrome maps to visualize the information gathered, identifying patterns and making informed decisions to improve asthma care in Pisgah Forest.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like