The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 28779, Sylva, North Carolina is 42 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.68 percent of the residents in 28779 has some form of health insurance. 36.69 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.81 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 28779 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 3,841 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 28779. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,832 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,152 health care providers accessible to residents in 28779, Sylva, North Carolina.
Health Scores in 28779, Sylva, North Carolina
Asthma Score | 24 |
---|---|
People Score | 35 |
Provider Score | 42 |
Hospital Score | 25 |
Travel Score | 52 |
28779 | Sylva | North Carolina | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
**Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 28779 & Primary Care Availability in Sylva**
Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 28779, encompassing Sylva, North Carolina, requires a multifaceted approach. We must consider factors influencing asthma management, including physician availability, access to primary care, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources. These elements collectively contribute to an "Asthma Score," reflecting the overall capacity of the local healthcare system to effectively address the needs of asthma patients.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a fundamental indicator of access. A higher ratio, reflecting more physicians per capita, generally correlates with better access to care and, consequently, improved asthma management. Within Sylva, the precise physician-to-patient ratio for primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists requires careful investigation. Publicly available data from sources like the North Carolina Medical Board and the U.S. Census Bureau, when cross-referenced, can provide a baseline. Any shortage of specialists, particularly pulmonologists, can significantly impact asthma patients, potentially leading to delayed diagnoses, inadequate treatment, and increased emergency room visits.
Primary care availability is another critical component. PCPs often serve as the first point of contact for asthma patients, providing initial diagnoses, medication management, and ongoing monitoring. The accessibility of PCPs in Sylva, considering factors like appointment wait times, insurance acceptance, and clinic locations, directly influences the "Asthma Score." Areas with limited primary care access might necessitate patients seeking care in emergency departments, a less-than-ideal scenario for asthma management.
Certain medical practices in Sylva might stand out in their approach to asthma care. Practices known for incorporating evidence-based guidelines, offering comprehensive asthma education programs, and actively engaging in patient self-management support would likely score higher. Identifying these standout practices requires examining their service offerings, patient reviews, and participation in quality improvement initiatives. Practices that have a dedicated asthma nurse or respiratory therapist on staff can provide significant advantages.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly relevant, particularly in rural areas like Sylva. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and improving access to care, especially for follow-up appointments and medication adjustments. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms, offering virtual consultations and remote monitoring capabilities, are likely to enhance their "Asthma Score." The availability of telehealth services can be a game-changer for asthma patients, especially during times of exacerbation or in areas with limited access to specialists.
Mental health resources play a significant role in asthma management. Asthma, a chronic condition, can be associated with anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health services, including therapists and psychiatrists, within Sylva is a crucial factor. Practices that integrate mental health screening and treatment into their asthma care protocols are likely to provide more holistic and effective care, positively influencing the "Asthma Score." Asthma can be exacerbated by stress and anxiety, so addressing these issues is essential for optimal patient outcomes.
Evaluating the "Asthma Score" also requires assessing the availability of asthma education resources. Patient education is a cornerstone of asthma management, empowering patients to understand their condition, recognize triggers, and take appropriate action. Practices that offer asthma education classes, provide written materials, and utilize online resources are likely to score higher. The presence of support groups and educational programs within the community also contributes to a higher score.
Further, the availability of pharmacies and the ease of obtaining asthma medications are essential. Patients need convenient access to their prescribed medications to maintain control of their asthma. The presence of pharmacies within Sylva and their ability to handle insurance claims and provide medication counseling is a key component. The availability of inhalers, nebulizers, and other asthma-related supplies also influences the overall "Asthma Score."
In addition to the factors mentioned above, the "Asthma Score" should consider the quality of care provided. This includes assessing the use of evidence-based guidelines, the frequency of asthma control assessments, and the rates of asthma-related hospitalizations and emergency room visits. Practices that consistently demonstrate high-quality care, as evidenced by these metrics, are likely to receive higher scores.
The socioeconomic factors within Sylva also need consideration. Poverty, lack of insurance, and limited access to transportation can create barriers to healthcare access, negatively impacting asthma management. Addressing these social determinants of health is crucial for improving the "Asthma Score" and ensuring equitable access to care for all residents.
The "Asthma Score" is not a static number. It is a dynamic assessment that should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape. This includes monitoring physician availability, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. It also requires ongoing evaluation of the quality of care provided and the impact of socioeconomic factors.
In conclusion, assessing the "Asthma Score" for doctors in ZIP code 28779 and primary care availability in Sylva is a complex undertaking. A comprehensive analysis must consider physician-to-patient ratios, primary care access, standout practices, telemedicine integration, mental health resources, and socioeconomic factors. This analysis can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system, informing efforts to improve asthma management and patient outcomes.
For a comprehensive visualization of the healthcare landscape in Sylva and surrounding areas, including physician locations, primary care availability, and other relevant data, we encourage you to explore **CartoChrome maps**.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like