07670, Tenafly, New Jersey Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 07670, Tenafly, New Jersey is 65 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.57 percent of the residents in 07670 has some form of health insurance. 17.24 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 85.29 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 07670 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 5,222 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 07670. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,975 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,744 health care providers accessible to residents in 07670, Tenafly, New Jersey.

The analysis will explore the asthma care landscape within ZIP code 07670, focusing on Tenafly, New Jersey. This involves evaluating the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) and their capacity to manage asthma, alongside an assessment of additional resources crucial for comprehensive asthma management. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system in addressing asthma, informing residents and healthcare professionals.

The foundation of effective asthma care lies in accessible and competent primary care. Tenafly, within ZIP code 07670, boasts a relatively affluent and well-educated population, which often translates to a higher expectation for healthcare quality. Evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical first step. Publicly available data from sources like the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services or state medical boards can provide estimates of the number of PCPs practicing within the ZIP code. Comparing this number to the estimated population allows for a preliminary assessment of access. A higher ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally suggests better access. However, this metric alone is insufficient.

The quality of care is equally important. The analysis needs to delve deeper than just the number of doctors. It requires investigating the training and experience of the PCPs, specifically their familiarity with asthma management guidelines, such as those established by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP). This involves examining their board certifications, affiliations with hospitals known for respiratory care expertise (e.g., Englewood Health), and the presence of asthma-specific protocols within their practices. Patient reviews, while subjective, can offer insights into patient experiences with asthma management, including communication, medication adherence support, and the responsiveness of the practice to urgent needs.

Identifying standout practices is crucial. These are practices that demonstrate a commitment to exemplary asthma care. This could involve practices that have a dedicated asthma educator, offer comprehensive asthma action plans, provide regular follow-up appointments, and actively monitor patients’ asthma control. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient data and facilitate communication with specialists, such as pulmonologists, are also likely to be ranked higher. Furthermore, practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives related to asthma care demonstrate a commitment to continuous improvement.

Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor in modern healthcare, particularly for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, medication refills, and symptom monitoring, increasing access to care, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in areas with limited access to specialists. The analysis should assess the extent to which PCPs in 07670 offer telemedicine services for asthma management. This includes evaluating the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote monitoring devices (e.g., peak flow meters), and the integration of telemedicine into the overall asthma care plan. Practices that embrace telemedicine demonstrate a forward-thinking approach and a commitment to patient convenience and accessibility.

Beyond the direct medical care provided by PCPs, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial component of comprehensive asthma management. Asthma can significantly impact a patient’s quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The analysis needs to examine the availability of mental health services within the community, including access to therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists. It is essential to assess whether PCPs are equipped to screen for mental health issues and whether they have established referral pathways to mental health professionals. Collaboration between PCPs and mental health providers is crucial for providing holistic care that addresses both the physical and psychological aspects of asthma.

Furthermore, the analysis should consider the availability of other supportive resources. This includes access to asthma education programs, support groups, and community-based programs that provide education and resources for asthma management. These programs can empower patients to take control of their condition and improve their overall quality of life. The presence of these resources indicates a community-wide commitment to asthma care and a more comprehensive approach to patient well-being.

The analysis must also consider the presence of specialists. While PCPs are the cornerstone of asthma management, access to pulmonologists (lung specialists) is essential for patients with more complex or uncontrolled asthma. The analysis should investigate the availability of pulmonologists in the area, the ease of referral from PCPs, and the wait times for appointments. Proximity to specialized care centers, such as those affiliated with major hospitals, can significantly improve the quality of care.

In conclusion, assessing the asthma care landscape in ZIP code 07670, specifically Tenafly, requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of primary care, the adoption of telemedicine, the availability of mental health resources, and the presence of other supportive services. This comprehensive analysis will provide a valuable understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system in addressing asthma.

For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Tenafly, including physician locations, specialist availability, and the distribution of healthcare resources, we encourage you to explore CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps offer a detailed and dynamic view of the healthcare infrastructure, providing valuable insights for both patients and healthcare professionals.