The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 08004, Atco, New Jersey is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.07 percent of the residents in 08004 has some form of health insurance. 37.47 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 74.07 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 08004 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,018 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 08004. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,898 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 8,980 health care providers accessible to residents in 08004, Atco, New Jersey.
Health Scores in 08004, Atco, New Jersey
Asthma Score | 53 |
---|---|
People Score | 25 |
Provider Score | 74 |
Hospital Score | 27 |
Travel Score | 70 |
08004 | Atco | New Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, significantly impacts quality of life. Assessing healthcare resources for asthma management is crucial, particularly in specific geographic areas. This analysis focuses on evaluating asthma care for doctors in ZIP Code 08004 (Atco, New Jersey) and the related primary care availability within the town. We will examine physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and explore the availability of mental health resources, providing a comprehensive ‘Asthma Score’ analysis.
The foundation of effective asthma management lies in readily accessible primary care. In Atco (08004), the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator. While specific, real-time data on this ratio fluctuates, publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and the New Jersey Department of Health can provide estimates. A lower ratio (more physicians per patient) generally suggests better access. However, the actual impact is more complex. Even with a favorable ratio, factors such as insurance acceptance, appointment availability, and practice size influence accessibility. The analysis must consider the number of practicing primary care physicians within the ZIP code and the estimated population.
Several factors contribute to the ‘Asthma Score’ for individual practices. Standout practices demonstrate excellence in asthma management through several key characteristics. These include physicians with specialized training or board certification in pulmonology or allergy and immunology. They also have established protocols for asthma diagnosis and treatment, adhering to national guidelines such as those from the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP). Practices utilizing electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient data management and patient tracking, including medication adherence and symptom control, receive higher scores. Furthermore, practices that offer patient education programs, including asthma action plans and inhaler technique training, are highly valued.
Telemedicine has revolutionized healthcare delivery, especially in managing chronic conditions like asthma. Practices adopting telemedicine offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of symptoms, and medication refills. This increases accessibility, particularly for patients with mobility issues or those living in geographically remote areas. The ‘Asthma Score’ gives weight to practices offering telemedicine services. The quality of the telemedicine platform, including ease of use, security, and integration with EHRs, also impacts the scoring. Practices that proactively use telemedicine for asthma management, such as regular follow-up appointments and medication adjustments based on remote monitoring data, receive higher marks.
Asthma is often linked to mental health challenges, including anxiety and depression. These conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a crucial component of the ‘Asthma Score’. Practices that have integrated mental health services into their asthma care model are highly regarded. This can include on-site therapists, referrals to mental health specialists, or collaboration with mental health providers. Practices that screen patients for anxiety and depression and offer support or referral services receive higher scores. The integration of mental health support demonstrates a holistic approach to asthma management.
The analysis must consider the specific practices within 08004. For example, the ‘Asthma Score’ would evaluate the number of primary care physicians, their training, and their adherence to asthma management guidelines. The availability of telemedicine services and mental health support would also be assessed. The score would also consider the practice's patient education programs and their use of EHRs.
The ‘Asthma Score’ for primary care availability in Atco is also impacted by the geographical distribution of practices. If practices are concentrated in one area, access for patients in other parts of the town might be limited. Transportation options, such as public transit or proximity to major roads, also influence accessibility. The analysis must consider the geographic distribution of practices and the ease with which patients can reach them.
The ‘Asthma Score’ is not just a numerical rating; it's a holistic assessment of the healthcare landscape for asthma management. It considers the availability of primary care physicians, the quality of care provided by individual practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources. This comprehensive approach provides a valuable tool for patients seeking asthma care and for healthcare providers striving to improve their services.
The ‘Asthma Score’ analysis is dynamic, reflecting the ever-changing healthcare landscape. Regular updates are essential to maintain its accuracy and relevance. The availability of new medical technologies, changes in healthcare policies, and evolving patient needs necessitate continuous evaluation. The analysis should also incorporate patient feedback to gauge satisfaction and identify areas for improvement.
The ‘Asthma Score’ for 08004 (Atco) would ideally identify specific practices that excel in asthma management. These practices would be recognized for their physician expertise, adherence to guidelines, use of technology, and integration of mental health support. The analysis would also highlight areas where improvements are needed, such as increasing the number of primary care physicians, expanding telemedicine services, or enhancing mental health support.
The final ‘Asthma Score’ for Atco would be a composite of these factors. It would provide a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system for asthma management. This information can be used by patients to make informed decisions about their care, by healthcare providers to improve their services, and by policymakers to allocate resources effectively.
For a detailed visual representation of the healthcare landscape in 08004, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and accessibility factors, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a dynamic and interactive way to visualize healthcare data, providing a valuable tool for patients, providers, and policymakers.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like