The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 08041, Jobstown, New Jersey is 85 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.67 percent of the residents in 08041 has some form of health insurance. 30.43 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.97 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 08041 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 147 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 4 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 08041. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 158 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 8,918 health care providers accessible to residents in 08041, Jobstown, New Jersey.
Health Scores in 08041, Jobstown, New Jersey
Asthma Score | 95 |
---|---|
People Score | 76 |
Provider Score | 85 |
Hospital Score | 45 |
Travel Score | 74 |
08041 | Jobstown | New Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing healthcare accessibility and asthma management within ZIP Code 08041, encompassing Jobstown, requires a multifaceted approach. We will examine the available medical resources, specifically focusing on primary care physicians (PCPs) and their ability to address asthma, a chronic respiratory condition. The analysis will incorporate physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources, recognizing the significant interplay between asthma and psychological well-being.
Jobstown, nestled within 08041, likely faces challenges common to suburban and rural areas regarding healthcare access. The density of medical professionals is a critical factor. A low physician-to-patient ratio suggests potential difficulty in securing timely appointments, leading to delayed diagnosis, treatment, and overall management of conditions like asthma. Conversely, a high ratio indicates a greater availability of care. Publicly available data from sources like the U.S. Census Bureau and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) would be crucial in determining the exact physician-to-patient ratio within this specific ZIP code. This information would provide a foundational understanding of the healthcare landscape.
Identifying standout practices within 08041 requires a deeper dive. This involves researching practices known for their specialization in pulmonology, allergy, and immunology – the core disciplines for asthma care. The reputation of these practices, gleaned from patient reviews, professional recommendations, and the quality of their facilities, becomes paramount. Are there practices known for their commitment to asthma education, providing patients with the knowledge and skills to manage their condition effectively? Do they offer comprehensive services, including pulmonary function testing, allergy testing, and personalized treatment plans? Practices that demonstrate a proactive approach to patient care, utilizing evidence-based guidelines and fostering strong patient-physician relationships, would naturally rank higher.
Telemedicine adoption presents another crucial aspect of the analysis. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telemedicine, and its continued use is particularly relevant for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Practices offering virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and online educational resources can significantly improve patient access to care, especially for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Telemedicine also facilitates more frequent check-ins, allowing for timely adjustments to treatment plans and proactive management of exacerbations. The availability of telehealth services directly impacts the asthma score, reflecting a practice's commitment to accessible and convenient care.
The connection between asthma and mental health is well-documented. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in individuals with asthma, often exacerbating symptoms and impacting quality of life. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the healthcare system is a crucial consideration. Does 08041 have access to mental health professionals, such as psychiatrists, psychologists, and therapists, who can provide support to asthma patients? Are these services integrated into the primary care practices, allowing for seamless coordination of care? Practices that recognize and address the mental health needs of their patients will invariably score higher on the asthma assessment. The availability of mental health support is as vital as the availability of medication.
Evaluating the "Asthma Score" for doctors in 08041 involves synthesizing these factors. A high score would be assigned to practices with a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, indicating greater accessibility. Standout practices, recognized for their expertise in asthma management, comprehensive services, and positive patient outcomes, would contribute significantly to the score. Practices embracing telemedicine, offering virtual consultations, and remote monitoring would further elevate the score. Finally, the presence of integrated mental health resources, ensuring that patients receive holistic care, would be a critical component of a high asthma score.
Conversely, a low score would be indicative of limited access to care, a scarcity of specialized expertise, a lack of telemedicine adoption, and an absence of mental health support. This scenario would necessitate a concerted effort to improve healthcare infrastructure, recruit more physicians, and integrate mental health services into primary care practices. This could involve community outreach programs, partnerships with local hospitals, and the implementation of telehealth solutions.
The assessment process would ideally involve collecting data from various sources, including public health agencies, insurance providers, and patient surveys. Analyzing this data would provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in 08041, allowing for the creation of a nuanced asthma score for each practice. This score would serve as a valuable tool for patients seeking asthma care, enabling them to make informed decisions about their healthcare providers.
The analysis would also need to consider the demographics of the population within 08041. Are there specific populations, such as children or the elderly, who are disproportionately affected by asthma? Understanding these demographic factors is essential for tailoring healthcare interventions and ensuring equitable access to care. The analysis must also consider the social determinants of health, such as socioeconomic status, access to transportation, and environmental factors, which can significantly impact asthma outcomes.
In conclusion, a thorough analysis of healthcare resources in 08041, focusing on primary care availability and asthma management, is crucial for improving patient outcomes. This analysis should consider physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare system, we can identify areas for improvement and ensure that individuals with asthma receive the comprehensive care they need. To visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in 08041, we encourage you to explore the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like