The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 08832, Keasbey, New Jersey is 77 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 86.38 percent of the residents in 08832 has some form of health insurance. 37.73 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 59.89 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 08832 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 862 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 08832. An estimate of 7 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 118 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,782 health care providers accessible to residents in 08832, Keasbey, New Jersey.
Health Scores in 08832, Keasbey, New Jersey
Asthma Score | 64 |
---|---|
People Score | 22 |
Provider Score | 77 |
Hospital Score | 30 |
Travel Score | 83 |
08832 | Keasbey | New Jersey | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Keasbey, NJ (ZIP Code 08832)
Analyzing the landscape of asthma care within Keasbey, New Jersey (ZIP code 08832) requires a multi-faceted approach. We'll assess the availability and quality of primary care physicians, considering factors crucial for asthma management, such as physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive ‘Asthma Score’ assessment, offering insights for residents seeking optimal care.
The foundation of effective asthma management lies in accessible primary care. In Keasbey, understanding the physician-to-patient ratio is paramount. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally translates to shorter wait times for appointments and more personalized attention. However, simply looking at the raw numbers isn't enough. The specialty of these physicians matters. Are there enough board-certified family medicine practitioners and internists experienced in asthma diagnosis and treatment? Are pediatricians readily available, considering the prevalence of asthma in children? This initial assessment will reveal the baseline accessibility of primary care, directly impacting the ‘Asthma Score’.
Beyond mere numbers, the quality of care provided by individual practices significantly influences the score. Identifying standout practices requires research. This includes examining patient reviews, assessing the practice's adherence to national asthma guidelines, and evaluating the availability of on-site pulmonary function testing. Practices that actively participate in patient education programs, offer personalized asthma action plans, and demonstrate a commitment to ongoing monitoring and follow-up care will naturally receive higher marks. Moreover, the presence of registered respiratory therapists within the practice can greatly improve asthma management, offering specialized expertise and support.
The adoption of telemedicine is another crucial factor. Telemedicine offers significant advantages for asthma patients, particularly those with mobility issues or living in areas with limited access to in-person care. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of peak flow meters, and medication management via telehealth platforms will receive a boost in their ‘Asthma Score’. Telemedicine not only enhances convenience but can also improve adherence to treatment plans, leading to better asthma control and fewer exacerbations.
Asthma is a chronic condition often intertwined with mental health challenges. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact quality of life. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within primary care practices or through referral networks is a critical component of the ‘Asthma Score’ assessment. Practices that proactively screen for mental health issues, offer on-site counseling services, or have established partnerships with mental health professionals will be viewed favorably. This integrated approach to care recognizes the holistic needs of asthma patients.
Evaluating the practices in Keasbey also involves examining their responsiveness to emergent situations. How readily available are physicians for urgent asthma-related concerns? Do practices offer after-hours care or have established protocols for managing acute exacerbations? The ability to provide timely and effective care during asthma attacks is essential for preventing hospitalizations and improving patient outcomes. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to providing comprehensive care, including emergency management, will be rated higher.
Furthermore, the ‘Asthma Score’ must consider the availability of specialized asthma care. While primary care physicians are the cornerstone of asthma management, access to pulmonologists and allergists is essential for complex cases or when initial treatments prove ineffective. The presence of these specialists within a reasonable geographic radius of Keasbey, or the existence of efficient referral pathways, contributes positively to the overall score. This ensures that patients have access to the expertise needed for optimal asthma control.
The assessment also needs to consider the availability of patient education materials and resources. Practices that provide patients with comprehensive information about asthma triggers, medication management, and self-management techniques will receive higher marks. Access to educational materials in multiple languages, considering the diverse population of Keasbey, is also important. The goal is to empower patients to actively participate in their own care and improve their quality of life.
The analysis must also consider the affordability of care. The cost of medications, specialist visits, and other asthma-related expenses can be a significant burden for patients. Practices that offer affordable options, such as assistance programs for medication costs or partnerships with community health organizations, will be viewed more favorably. Addressing the financial barriers to care is crucial for ensuring that all residents of Keasbey have access to the asthma management they need.
Finally, the ‘Asthma Score’ will be a dynamic assessment. Healthcare landscapes change rapidly, with new practices opening, telemedicine adoption increasing, and guidelines evolving. The score must be regularly updated to reflect these changes. This ongoing assessment will provide residents of Keasbey with the most current and accurate information about the quality and accessibility of asthma care in their community.
This ‘Asthma Score’ analysis, though not a numerical ranking, provides a detailed framework for evaluating asthma care in Keasbey, NJ. It highlights the key factors that influence the quality and accessibility of care, from physician-to-patient ratios and telemedicine adoption to mental health resources and affordability. Understanding these factors is crucial for residents seeking to manage their asthma effectively.
For a visual representation of these factors, including the geographic distribution of healthcare providers, telemedicine availability, and other relevant data points, consider exploring the interactive maps offered by CartoChrome. These maps can provide a valuable visual context to supplement this analysis, allowing for a more informed understanding of the asthma care landscape in Keasbey.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like