The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 15043, Georgetown, Pennsylvania is 56 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.25 percent of the residents in 15043 has some form of health insurance. 32.93 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.44 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15043 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 432 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15043. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 494 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,762 health care providers accessible to residents in 15043, Georgetown, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15043, Georgetown, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 87 |
---|---|
People Score | 75 |
Provider Score | 56 |
Hospital Score | 54 |
Travel Score | 69 |
15043 | Georgetown | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma management within the 15043 ZIP code, encompassing the Georgetown area, demands a multifaceted approach. Evaluating the quality of care necessitates a granular analysis, moving beyond simple metrics to encompass physician accessibility, the integration of technology, and the availability of supportive services, particularly those addressing the often-overlooked mental health aspects of chronic respiratory conditions. This analysis aims to provide a comprehensive “Asthma Score” assessment for physicians and the overall primary care landscape in Georgetown.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a foundational element of accessibility. While precise figures fluctuate, a scarcity of primary care physicians in a given area can significantly hinder timely asthma diagnosis, treatment initiation, and ongoing management. This is especially critical for a condition requiring proactive intervention. A high physician-to-patient ratio, potentially exceeding the national average, would negatively impact the "Asthma Score" for the area. This would translate to longer wait times for appointments, less time for comprehensive patient education, and potentially delayed access to specialist referrals, all of which contribute to poorer asthma control.
Standout practices within the 15043 ZIP code would be those demonstrating a commitment to asthma-specific protocols. This includes the consistent utilization of standardized asthma action plans, regular spirometry testing to assess lung function, and patient education programs that empower individuals to manage their condition effectively. Practices that proactively monitor asthma control through regular follow-up appointments and medication adjustments based on patient feedback would receive a higher "Asthma Score." Furthermore, practices that participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those aimed at reducing asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations, would demonstrate a commitment to superior care.
Telemedicine adoption is increasingly crucial in modern healthcare. For asthma management, telemedicine offers several advantages. Virtual consultations can facilitate medication refills, provide remote monitoring of symptoms, and deliver educational resources. Practices embracing telemedicine, particularly those offering secure video conferencing for asthma-related appointments, would receive a positive "Asthma Score" adjustment. This is especially beneficial for patients with mobility limitations, those living in geographically isolated areas, or those seeking convenient follow-up care. However, simply offering telemedicine is insufficient; the quality of the virtual experience, including the availability of technical support and the integration of telemedicine into the overall care plan, is paramount.
The integration of mental health resources is a critical, often-overlooked, aspect of asthma management. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that recognize this and offer, or facilitate access to, mental health services would receive a significant boost to their "Asthma Score." This includes the availability of on-site therapists or counselors, referrals to mental health professionals specializing in chronic illness, and the integration of mental health screening tools into routine asthma care. A holistic approach, acknowledging the interconnectedness of physical and mental health, is essential for optimal asthma control.
Primary care availability in Georgetown, beyond the individual physician level, requires a broader assessment. This includes evaluating the presence of urgent care facilities equipped to handle asthma exacerbations, the availability of after-hours care options, and the ease of access to specialist referrals, such as pulmonologists and allergists. A well-coordinated healthcare system, where primary care physicians can seamlessly connect patients with the resources they need, would receive a higher "Asthma Score" for the overall Georgetown area. This also includes the presence of community resources, such as asthma support groups and educational programs offered by local health organizations.
Specific to the 15043 ZIP code, any practice demonstrating a commitment to culturally competent care would be favorably evaluated. This means tailoring asthma management strategies to the specific needs of the patient population, considering factors such as language barriers, cultural beliefs, and socioeconomic disparities. Practices that actively engage with the community, participate in outreach programs, and provide educational materials in multiple languages would demonstrate a commitment to equitable care, thereby positively impacting their "Asthma Score."
The "Asthma Score" for a physician or practice within the 15043 ZIP code, therefore, is not simply a measure of medical expertise. It is a comprehensive assessment of the entire healthcare ecosystem, encompassing accessibility, technology integration, mental health support, and a commitment to patient-centered care. Practices that prioritize these elements, demonstrating a proactive and holistic approach to asthma management, would receive the highest scores.
The overall "Asthma Score" for Georgetown would be a composite of individual physician scores, factoring in the availability of primary care, specialist access, and community resources. A low score would indicate significant deficiencies in the healthcare infrastructure, potentially leading to poor asthma control, increased hospitalizations, and a lower quality of life for residents. Conversely, a high score would reflect a well-coordinated and patient-centered healthcare system, providing optimal care for individuals with asthma.
Evaluating the "Asthma Score" for individual physicians and the overall healthcare landscape is an ongoing process. The healthcare environment is dynamic, and the needs of patients evolve. Regularly assessing the quality of care, adapting to new technologies, and addressing the social determinants of health are essential for improving asthma management outcomes. This includes evaluating the impact of policy changes, such as those related to insurance coverage and access to medications.
This analysis highlights the complexities of asthma management and the importance of a comprehensive approach. To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in the 15043 ZIP code and to visualize the distribution of resources, consider exploring the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome. CartoChrome can provide valuable insights into physician locations, access to care, and other relevant factors, enabling a more informed assessment of asthma management in Georgetown.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like