The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 15233, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is 82 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 79.28 percent of the residents in 15233 has some form of health insurance. 29.10 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 62.72 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15233 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 306 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 201 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15233. An estimate of 171 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 340 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 69,570 health care providers accessible to residents in 15233, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15233, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 83 |
---|---|
People Score | 45 |
Provider Score | 82 |
Hospital Score | 53 |
Travel Score | 65 |
15233 | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, significantly impacts quality of life, and access to quality healthcare is paramount in its management. This analysis delves into the availability and quality of asthma care within ZIP code 15233 (Pittsburgh) and the broader context of primary care in the city. We will assess the landscape, focusing on physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine integration, and the presence of mental health resources, all factors influencing an “Asthma Score” for the region.
The physician-to-patient ratio serves as a foundational metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times, reduced access to appointments, and potentially compromised continuity of care, all of which negatively impact asthma management. While specific, up-to-the-minute data is dynamic and requires constant monitoring, publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the U.S. Census Bureau can be combined to estimate this ratio. For 15233, and Pittsburgh as a whole, the ratio is likely influenced by the concentration of medical institutions and the presence of both primary care physicians and specialists, including pulmonologists and allergists. The presence of large hospitals and medical schools, like those in the broader Pittsburgh area, can, in theory, improve the ratio, but actual access often depends on factors like insurance acceptance, patient demographics, and practice capacity.
Within the 15233 ZIP code, and throughout Pittsburgh, identifying “standout practices” requires examining several key indicators. These include the presence of board-certified allergists and pulmonologists, the availability of comprehensive asthma education programs for patients and families, and the utilization of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, track patient outcomes, and demonstrate a commitment to patient-centered care are likely to rank higher. Furthermore, practices that offer extended hours, weekend appointments, or same-day sick visits demonstrate a greater commitment to patient accessibility. Reviews from patients, available on platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals, can provide valuable insights into patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care. Practices with high patient satisfaction scores, particularly regarding communication, empathy, and the effectiveness of treatment plans, would contribute positively to the “Asthma Score.”
Telemedicine adoption has rapidly transformed healthcare delivery, particularly in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. For asthma management, telemedicine offers significant advantages, including remote monitoring of symptoms, virtual consultations, and medication management. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their asthma care programs can improve patient access, reduce the need for in-person visits, and enhance patient adherence to treatment plans. Telemedicine also allows for more frequent check-ins, which can be particularly beneficial for patients with poorly controlled asthma. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption involves examining the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote monitoring devices (like peak flow meters), and the integration of telehealth platforms with electronic health records. Practices that offer comprehensive telemedicine services would positively influence the "Asthma Score."
The intersection of asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in individuals with asthma, and these conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. The availability of mental health resources, such as access to therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists, is therefore crucial for comprehensive asthma care. Practices that screen patients for mental health conditions, offer on-site counseling services, or have established referral pathways to mental health providers demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care. The integration of mental health services can significantly improve the “Asthma Score” by addressing the complex needs of asthma patients. Collaboration between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, allergists, and mental health professionals is critical for providing coordinated and effective care.
Evaluating the “Asthma Score” for the 15233 ZIP code and Pittsburgh involves weighing these factors. A high score would reflect a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices with comprehensive asthma care programs, robust telemedicine adoption, and readily available mental health resources. Conversely, a low score would indicate challenges in one or more of these areas, potentially leading to poorer asthma control and a lower quality of life for patients. The score is not a static number but a dynamic assessment that should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.
The availability of primary care in Pittsburgh, and its impact on asthma management, is a broader consideration. The overall health of the primary care system, including factors like physician shortages, insurance coverage, and access to specialists, can significantly influence the quality of asthma care. A strong primary care system provides a foundation for early diagnosis, effective management, and timely referrals to specialists when needed. Conversely, a weakened primary care system can lead to delayed diagnoses, fragmented care, and poorer patient outcomes.
In conclusion, the “Asthma Score” for 15233 and Pittsburgh is a multifaceted assessment that considers access, quality, and the integration of mental health resources. While this analysis provides a general overview, a deeper understanding requires granular data and ongoing monitoring. For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Pittsburgh, and to explore the spatial distribution of resources and access to care, we encourage you to visit CartoChrome maps.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like