The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 15316, Brave, Pennsylvania is 45 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 15316 has some form of health insurance. 58.18 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 61.36 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15316 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 69 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15316. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 51 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 266 health care providers accessible to residents in 15316, Brave, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15316, Brave, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 77 |
---|---|
People Score | 92 |
Provider Score | 45 |
Hospital Score | 64 |
Travel Score | 32 |
15316 | Brave | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in 15316 & Primary Care in Brave
This analysis delves into the landscape of asthma care within ZIP code 15316, focusing on the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) in the context of asthma management. The geographic scope extends to Brave, PA, a location potentially impacted by the care options within the 15316 ZIP code. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the resources available to asthma patients, including physician-to-patient ratios, the prominence of specific practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health support.
The assessment begins with an examination of physician-to-patient ratios. Determining the exact number of PCPs practicing within 15316 and the surrounding areas is crucial. This data point, coupled with the estimated population of the region, provides a baseline understanding of access. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of PCPs relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced continuity of care, and potentially, delayed diagnosis or treatment adjustments for asthma patients. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility, potentially translating to improved asthma control and patient satisfaction. Analyzing this ratio specifically for PCPs, rather than all physicians, is critical as PCPs often serve as the initial point of contact for asthma management.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality and specialization of PCPs are vital. Are there board-certified pulmonologists or allergists in the area, or within a reasonable driving distance? These specialists offer advanced expertise in asthma diagnosis and treatment. Their availability, or lack thereof, significantly impacts the care pathway for complex asthma cases. A robust network of specialists, even if not directly located within 15316, can provide crucial support for PCPs, enabling them to manage a wider range of asthma severity levels effectively.
Identifying standout practices within 15316 and the surrounding areas is essential. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to asthma management often exhibit specific characteristics. These may include: dedicated asthma education programs for patients and families, the use of standardized asthma action plans, regular assessment of asthma control using validated tools, and a proactive approach to medication management. Furthermore, the adoption of electronic health records (EHRs) and their effective use for tracking patient data and facilitating communication between providers are key indicators of a well-managed practice. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and demonstrate positive patient outcomes deserve recognition.
The role of telemedicine in asthma care is increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine can enhance access to care by reducing the need for in-person visits, especially for routine follow-ups or medication adjustments. Assessing the telemedicine adoption rate among PCPs in 15316 is crucial. Do practices offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, or online patient portals for communication? The availability of telemedicine can be particularly beneficial for patients with mobility limitations, those living in remote areas, or those seeking more convenient access to care.
The integration of mental health resources into asthma management is another critical consideration. Asthma, as a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being. Anxiety, depression, and stress are common comorbidities. Therefore, assessing the availability of mental health support within the primary care setting or through referral networks is essential. Does the practice screen for mental health issues? Are there readily accessible mental health professionals, such as therapists or counselors, available to provide support? A holistic approach that addresses both the physical and psychological aspects of asthma is crucial for achieving optimal patient outcomes.
The analysis also considers the specific challenges and opportunities presented by the location of Brave, PA. The distance from 15316, the availability of public transportation, and the demographic characteristics of the Brave population all influence access to care. Examining the availability of transportation options, the socioeconomic status of the residents, and the prevalence of asthma within the Brave community provides a more complete understanding of the healthcare needs. This information informs strategies to improve asthma care delivery, such as mobile clinics, community health worker programs, or targeted educational campaigns.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the availability of community resources. Are there local support groups for asthma patients and their families? Are there educational programs offered by hospitals or community organizations? The presence of these resources can empower patients to actively manage their condition and improve their quality of life. A well-informed and supported patient is more likely to adhere to treatment plans and achieve better asthma control.
Finally, the assessment should evaluate the overall coordination of care. Does the primary care practice collaborate effectively with specialists, pharmacies, and other healthcare providers? The seamless exchange of information and coordinated care are essential for optimal asthma management. The use of electronic health records (EHRs) that allow for secure sharing of patient data is a key enabler of effective care coordination. A well-coordinated care team can ensure that patients receive the right care at the right time.
In conclusion, assessing the asthma care landscape within 15316 and its implications for Brave requires a multi-faceted approach. This involves evaluating physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, examining mental health resources, and understanding the unique challenges and opportunities presented by the local geography. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of the resources available to asthma patients and to identify areas for improvement.
For a visual representation of these findings, including a geographically-based map of physician locations, practice characteristics, and resource availability, consider exploring the dynamic mapping capabilities offered by CartoChrome. Their interactive maps can provide a powerful tool for understanding the asthma care landscape in 15316 and Brave.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like