Asthma Score

15338, Greensboro, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 15338, Greensboro, Pennsylvania

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 15338, Greensboro, Pennsylvania is 33 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 96.72 percent of the residents in 15338 has some form of health insurance. 46.38 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.89 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15338 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 524 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15338. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 271 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 793 health care providers accessible to residents in 15338, Greensboro, Pennsylvania.

Health Scores in 15338, Greensboro, Pennsylvania

Asthma Score 44
People Score 62
Provider Score 33
Hospital Score 40
Travel Score 49

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

15338 Greensboro Pennsylvania
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 15338, Greensboro, Pennsylvania

## Asthma Score Analysis: Comparing Physician Access and Resources

This analysis delves into the landscape of asthma care within ZIP Code 15338 and contrasts it with primary care availability in Greensboro, North Carolina. We aim to assess the accessibility and quality of care, focusing on factors crucial for asthma management, including physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. This comparative approach provides a nuanced understanding of the strengths and weaknesses in each location, ultimately highlighting areas for potential improvement.

The assessment of asthma care in 15338 begins with a geographical understanding. This ZIP code, likely encompassing a specific area, requires a localized approach to determine the availability of pulmonologists, allergists, and primary care physicians equipped to manage asthma. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A high ratio, indicating a larger number of patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially compromised care due to time constraints. Data from local healthcare systems, insurance providers, and public health agencies would be essential to accurately calculate this ratio.

In contrast, Greensboro, a larger metropolitan area, presents a different set of challenges and opportunities. The city’s size and population density often translate to a more complex healthcare ecosystem. Primary care availability in Greensboro is the primary focus. Access to primary care physicians serves as the crucial first step in asthma management. Early diagnosis, regular monitoring, and the development of personalized asthma action plans are vital, and primary care physicians are often the gatekeepers to these services.

Standout practices in both locations require careful scrutiny. In 15338, we would look for practices demonstrating excellence in asthma management. This includes practices with board-certified pulmonologists or allergists, a dedicated asthma education program, and the ability to offer comprehensive diagnostic testing, such as spirometry and allergy testing. Practices demonstrating proactive patient engagement, such as regular follow-up appointments and patient education materials, would also be highly regarded.

Greensboro's primary care practices need evaluation. Successful practices should prioritize preventative care, provide asthma-specific education, and have a well-defined referral system for specialist consultations. Practices that employ certified asthma educators and offer flexible appointment scheduling, including evening and weekend hours, would be considered more accessible.

Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor in both areas. Telemedicine offers the potential to improve access to care, especially for patients in rural or underserved areas. Practices utilizing telemedicine for asthma management, such as virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and medication refills, would receive a higher score. The ability to provide telehealth services can reduce the burden of travel for patients, improve medication adherence, and facilitate more frequent contact with healthcare providers.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, yet they are crucial. Asthma is a chronic condition that can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services into their asthma care, either through on-site therapists or referrals to mental health professionals, demonstrate a commitment to holistic patient care.

The analysis needs to consider the availability of asthma education programs. These programs empower patients with the knowledge and skills necessary to manage their condition effectively. Practices that offer structured asthma education classes, provide personalized action plans, and educate patients on proper inhaler technique and environmental control measures would be highly valued. The availability of these programs can improve patient self-management, reduce hospitalizations, and improve overall asthma control.

Furthermore, the analysis should examine the insurance coverage landscape. The acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicaid and Medicare, is a key factor in accessibility. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans ensure that more patients can access the care they need. This is particularly important for asthma patients, as the cost of medications and healthcare services can be a significant financial burden.

In 15338, the analysis should look at the availability of emergency services. Easy access to emergency care is vital for asthma patients. The proximity of hospitals with emergency departments equipped to treat asthma exacerbations, as well as the availability of ambulance services, is a critical factor in assessing the overall quality of care.

Greensboro's primary care practices should also be evaluated for their ability to collaborate with specialists. A well-coordinated care plan is essential for asthma management. Practices that have established relationships with pulmonologists, allergists, and other specialists, and that facilitate seamless referrals, demonstrate a commitment to providing comprehensive care.

The analysis should consider the availability of resources for children. Asthma is a common childhood condition, and pediatric asthma management requires a specialized approach. Practices that offer pediatric asthma care, including child-friendly education materials and age-appropriate treatment plans, would receive a higher score.

Ultimately, the goal is to create an 'Asthma Score' that reflects the overall quality, accessibility, and comprehensiveness of asthma care in each location. This score would be based on a weighted assessment of the factors discussed above. This score should be used as a tool to identify areas for improvement, guide patients in selecting healthcare providers, and inform healthcare policymakers in their efforts to improve asthma care.

To further enhance your understanding of the healthcare landscape, consider exploring the power of visual data representation. CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and interactive view of healthcare access, physician distribution, and other relevant data points. They can help you visualize the information discussed in this analysis and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare environment.

**Call to Action:**

Want to visualize the data and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape? Explore the potential of CartoChrome maps to visualize physician distribution, access to care, and other relevant data points.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 15338, Greensboro, Pennsylvania

You may also like

15315, Bobtown, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 15338: 1.73 Miles

Total Population:

15334, Garards Fort, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 15338: 1.79 Miles

Total Population:

15327, Dilliner, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 15338: 3.70 Miles

Total Population:

15351, Nemacolin, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 15338: 4.96 Miles

Total Population:

15320, Carmichaels, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 15338: 5.37 Miles

Total Population:

15349, Mount Morris, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 15338: 7.95 Miles

Total Population:

15357, Rices Landing, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 15338: 9.68 Miles

Total Population:

15325, Crucible, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 15338: 9.79 Miles

Total Population:

15344, Jefferson, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 15338: 9.83 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 15338, Greensboro, Pennsylvania