15558, Salisbury, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 15558, Salisbury, Pennsylvania is 55 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 82.87 percent of the residents in 15558 has some form of health insurance. 26.81 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.94 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15558 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 572 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15558. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 321 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 369 health care providers accessible to residents in 15558, Salisbury, Pennsylvania.

Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 15558 and Primary Care Availability in Salisbury

Analyzing healthcare access within ZIP code 15558, encompassing Salisbury, Pennsylvania, requires a multifaceted approach. An "Asthma Score" framework, though not a formally recognized metric, serves as a useful lens. It considers factors directly impacting asthma management, such as physician availability, quality of care, and support resources. This analysis will focus on primary care, as it represents the initial point of contact for asthma diagnosis and management.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a fundamental aspect. Determining the exact ratio in Salisbury is challenging due to the dynamic nature of physician practices and patient demographics. However, public health data, combined with information from local hospitals and clinics, can provide a reasonable estimate. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially poorer asthma control. Conversely, a higher ratio facilitates timely care and improved patient outcomes. This analysis will leverage publicly available data and cross-reference it with local healthcare provider directories to estimate the physician-to-patient ratio within the target ZIP code.

Standout practices in Salisbury, if any, would be those demonstrating exemplary asthma management. This assessment involves examining several key indicators. First, the availability of board-certified pulmonologists or physicians with specialized asthma training is crucial. Second, practices that integrate asthma education programs, including patient self-management training and inhaler technique instruction, are highly valued. Third, the utilization of evidence-based guidelines for asthma treatment, such as those from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), is critical. Finally, practices that actively monitor patient asthma control through regular assessments and adjustments to treatment plans would receive higher scores. This analysis will attempt to identify such practices by reviewing online patient reviews, examining practice websites, and potentially contacting local healthcare providers for information.

Telemedicine adoption is another vital factor in the "Asthma Score." Telemedicine offers significant advantages for asthma management, particularly for patients with limited mobility, those living in rural areas, or those requiring frequent follow-up appointments. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor asthma symptoms remotely, and provide medication refills electronically can significantly improve asthma control and reduce hospitalizations. Practices that have embraced telemedicine platforms and offer virtual asthma management services would receive higher scores. This analysis will investigate the telemedicine capabilities of local practices, including the types of services offered, the platforms used, and the availability of virtual appointments.

Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, yet they play a critical role. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that integrate mental health support into their asthma care plans, such as offering referrals to therapists or providing access to mental health resources, are considered more comprehensive. This analysis will assess the availability of mental health services within the local healthcare system, including the presence of mental health professionals within primary care practices or referral networks to mental health specialists.

In assessing primary care availability, factors beyond physician-to-patient ratios must be considered. The accessibility of primary care practices, including their location, hours of operation, and acceptance of various insurance plans, is crucial. Practices located within easy reach of residents, offering convenient appointment times, and accepting a wide range of insurance plans would receive higher scores. This analysis will consider the geographic distribution of primary care practices, their hours of operation, and their insurance acceptance policies.

Furthermore, the quality of asthma education provided by primary care physicians is a key determinant. Patients need to understand their asthma triggers, medications, and self-management strategies to effectively control their condition. Practices that provide comprehensive asthma education, including written materials, one-on-one counseling, and group education sessions, would receive higher scores. This analysis will assess the availability and quality of asthma education resources within local primary care practices.

Finally, the integration of technology to improve asthma management is a factor. Practices that utilize electronic health records (EHRs) to track patient asthma control, medication adherence, and symptom patterns would receive higher scores. The use of patient portals, allowing patients to access their medical records, communicate with their providers, and request refills, is also considered beneficial. This analysis will investigate the technological capabilities of local primary care practices and their use of technology to improve asthma management.

By systematically evaluating these factors, an "Asthma Score" can be developed, providing a more nuanced understanding of healthcare access and quality within ZIP code 15558. This analysis, though not a formal score, provides a framework for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system in relation to asthma management. The goal is to identify areas for improvement and to highlight practices that are excelling in providing comprehensive asthma care.

This analysis is based on available data and public information. Further in-depth research, including direct communication with local healthcare providers, would be required for a more comprehensive and accurate assessment. The findings of this analysis can inform efforts to improve asthma care in Salisbury and to ensure that residents have access to the resources they need to manage their condition effectively.

To further explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, practice locations, and patient demographics, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome offers powerful mapping and data visualization tools to gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Salisbury and beyond.