The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 15616, Armbrust, Pennsylvania is 70 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 15616 has some form of health insurance. 42.92 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 89.27 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15616 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 74 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15616. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 151 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,956 health care providers accessible to residents in 15616, Armbrust, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15616, Armbrust, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 98 |
---|---|
People Score | 92 |
Provider Score | 70 |
Hospital Score | 65 |
Travel Score | 72 |
15616 | Armbrust | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing asthma care within ZIP Code 15616, encompassing the Armbrust area, requires a multifaceted approach. An "Asthma Score," while not a formally standardized metric, can be constructed by evaluating several key factors. These include physician availability, practice quality, telemedicine integration, and access to mental health resources, all crucial for effective asthma management. The goal is to paint a comprehensive picture of the healthcare landscape for asthma sufferers in this specific locale.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a foundational element. Accurate data on the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists actively practicing within 15616 is essential. Publicly available databases, insurance provider directories, and local hospital affiliations can provide this information. Once the physician count is established, it needs to be compared to the population of 15616. A lower ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, could potentially lead to longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to specialized care, negatively impacting the Asthma Score. The availability of pulmonologists, specifically, is vital, given their expertise in managing complex respiratory conditions like asthma.
Primary care availability in Armbrust, a specific sub-area within the ZIP code, is equally significant. Armbrust's population density and demographic characteristics (age, socioeconomic status) should be considered. If Armbrust has a higher concentration of elderly residents or families with young children (both demographics potentially more susceptible to asthma), the need for readily accessible primary care is amplified. The geographical proximity of primary care practices to Armbrust residents is also a critical factor. A practice located a significant distance away, even if accepting new patients, might present accessibility challenges. Public transportation options and the availability of transportation assistance programs for those with limited mobility should also be factored in.
Evaluating the quality of care provided by local practices is another crucial aspect. This involves assessing several indicators. Patient satisfaction surveys, if available, provide valuable insights into the patient experience. The Asthma Score should consider patient feedback regarding communication, appointment scheduling, and the overall level of care. Furthermore, the practices' adherence to established asthma guidelines, such as those published by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) or the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), is paramount. Practices that consistently follow these guidelines are more likely to provide evidence-based, effective asthma management. The availability of on-site respiratory therapists, who can provide education on inhaler techniques and asthma triggers, is another positive indicator.
Telemedicine adoption represents a significant advancement in asthma care, particularly in rural or underserved areas. Practices that offer telehealth consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and virtual asthma education programs can improve access to care and empower patients to manage their condition effectively. The Asthma Score should reflect the extent of telemedicine integration within local practices. This includes assessing the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote monitoring devices (e.g., peak flow meters), and the availability of online patient portals for communication and education. The ease of use and technical support provided for telemedicine services are also important considerations.
The interplay between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Asthma can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Conversely, mental health conditions can worsen asthma symptoms. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the local healthcare ecosystem is a critical component of the Asthma Score. This includes assessing the presence of on-site mental health professionals (psychologists, therapists), referrals to mental health specialists, and collaborations with mental health organizations. Practices that proactively screen for mental health issues and offer integrated mental health services are likely to achieve better patient outcomes.
Identifying standout practices within 15616 is essential. These practices might demonstrate excellence in various areas, such as patient satisfaction, adherence to asthma guidelines, or telemedicine adoption. This could involve recognizing practices that have consistently high patient satisfaction scores, implement comprehensive asthma education programs, or are early adopters of telehealth technologies. Highlighting these practices can serve as a benchmark for other providers and guide patients in choosing the most suitable care. Further, identifying practices that specifically cater to pediatric asthma or adult asthma can improve the Asthma Score.
Evaluating the accessibility of asthma medications is another important consideration. This includes assessing the availability of preferred asthma medications, the affordability of these medications, and the practice's assistance with patient medication adherence. Practices that provide medication assistance programs, offer guidance on cost-saving options, and proactively address medication adherence issues are likely to achieve better patient outcomes. The proximity of pharmacies and the availability of mail-order pharmacy services should also be factored in.
Data collection and analysis for the Asthma Score would involve a combination of methods. Publicly available data, such as physician directories and hospital websites, can provide information on physician availability and practice locations. Patient satisfaction surveys, if available, can offer insights into the patient experience. Direct contact with local practices, through phone calls or questionnaires, can gather information on telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and adherence to asthma guidelines. This data, combined with population demographics and geographical information, can be used to construct a comprehensive Asthma Score.
The final Asthma Score would be a composite measure, reflecting the weighted average of the various factors discussed. The weighting of each factor would depend on its relative importance in asthma management. For example, physician availability and adherence to asthma guidelines might be given a higher weight than telemedicine adoption. The Asthma Score could be presented as a numerical value or a categorical rating (e.g., excellent, good, fair, poor). The score, along with supporting data, can be used to inform patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers about the quality of asthma care in the 15616 ZIP code.
The findings from this analysis can be visualized and explored using advanced mapping tools. CartoChrome Maps can provide a powerful platform for visualizing the Asthma Score and its underlying components. By mapping physician locations, practice quality ratings, telemedicine availability, and mental health resources, CartoChrome can create an interactive map that allows users to explore the healthcare landscape in detail. This visualization can facilitate data-driven decision-making, enabling patients to find the best care options and healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like