The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 15759, Marion Center, Pennsylvania is 26 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 84.72 percent of the residents in 15759 has some form of health insurance. 40.97 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.07 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15759 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 658 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15759. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 533 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 376 health care providers accessible to residents in 15759, Marion Center, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15759, Marion Center, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 15 |
---|---|
People Score | 46 |
Provider Score | 26 |
Hospital Score | 35 |
Travel Score | 28 |
15759 | Marion Center | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma, a chronic respiratory disease, presents a significant healthcare challenge, demanding accessible and effective medical care. This analysis focuses on evaluating the quality and availability of asthma care within ZIP code 15759 (Marion Center, Pennsylvania) and the surrounding area, specifically examining primary care physician (PCP) availability, physician-to-patient ratios, and the adoption of innovative healthcare solutions. The goal is to provide a comprehensive ‘Asthma Score’ assessment, considering various factors that influence the quality of care for individuals managing this condition.
The foundation of asthma care lies in the accessibility of primary care. Marion Center, a rural community, faces inherent challenges in this regard. The geographical spread of the population and potential limitations in transportation options can restrict access to medical facilities. Assessing the number of PCPs within the ZIP code and the surrounding areas is crucial. Ideally, a higher concentration of PCPs per capita indicates better access to care. However, this metric alone is insufficient. The availability of appointments, wait times, and the acceptance of various insurance plans also play a vital role.
Physician-to-patient ratios provide a quantitative measure of healthcare access. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per patient, generally signifies improved access to care. However, this ratio should be considered alongside other factors. The age and health status of the population within 15759 are relevant. A higher proportion of elderly residents or individuals with pre-existing respiratory conditions may place greater demands on the healthcare system, potentially straining resources even with a favorable physician-to-patient ratio. The analysis must therefore consider the demographic profile of the community.
Identifying standout practices within the region is a key component of the assessment. These practices may demonstrate superior performance in asthma management, offering comprehensive services, and achieving positive patient outcomes. Examining patient reviews, clinical outcomes data (if available), and the adoption of evidence-based asthma management guidelines can help identify these practices. Factors such as the availability of asthma education programs, the use of electronic health records (EHRs) for efficient patient management, and the integration of specialist referrals are essential considerations.
Telemedicine has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare, particularly in rural areas. Its potential to improve asthma care in Marion Center is significant. Telemedicine can facilitate remote consultations, medication management, and patient education, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits. The analysis should evaluate the extent of telemedicine adoption among PCPs in the area. This includes assessing the types of telemedicine services offered (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring), the availability of technology support for patients, and the integration of telemedicine into the overall care plan.
Mental health is inextricably linked to physical health, and this is particularly true for individuals with chronic conditions like asthma. The psychological burden of managing asthma, including anxiety and stress related to breathing difficulties and medication use, can significantly impact quality of life and treatment adherence. The analysis must therefore consider the availability of mental health resources within the community and the integration of mental health services into primary care practices. This includes assessing the availability of mental health professionals (e.g., psychologists, therapists), the presence of mental health support groups, and the integration of mental health screening and treatment into the primary care setting.
Beyond the direct provision of medical care, several other factors influence the ‘Asthma Score’. These include the availability of pharmacies and respiratory therapists, the presence of community-based asthma education programs, and the accessibility of emergency services. The analysis must consider these factors to provide a holistic assessment of asthma care in the region.
The analysis should also consider the quality of asthma education provided to patients. Effective asthma education empowers patients to manage their condition effectively, reducing the frequency of exacerbations and improving their overall quality of life. Assessing the availability and content of asthma education programs, including information on medication use, trigger avoidance, and self-management techniques, is crucial.
The analysis should also consider the role of insurance coverage in accessing asthma care. The acceptance of various insurance plans by PCPs and specialists in the area impacts the affordability and accessibility of care. The analysis should consider the insurance landscape within the community, including the availability of public and private insurance options.
The analysis should also consider the role of environmental factors in asthma management. Air quality, allergens, and other environmental triggers can significantly impact asthma symptoms. The analysis should consider the local environmental conditions and the availability of resources to help patients manage their exposure to environmental triggers.
In conclusion, evaluating asthma care in Marion Center (15759) requires a multi-faceted approach. It necessitates a detailed examination of PCP availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the consideration of environmental factors. The ‘Asthma Score’ should reflect a comprehensive assessment of these factors to provide a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of asthma care in the region.
For a deeper understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources and the factors influencing asthma care in Marion Center and surrounding areas, consider exploring the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome. These tools can provide valuable insights into the spatial relationships between healthcare providers, patient populations, and environmental factors, enhancing your understanding of asthma care accessibility and quality.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like