The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 15951, Saint Michael, Pennsylvania is 78 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 97.15 percent of the residents in 15951 has some form of health insurance. 72.10 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 56.42 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15951 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 3 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15951. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 211 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,219 health care providers accessible to residents in 15951, Saint Michael, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15951, Saint Michael, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 68 |
---|---|
People Score | 34 |
Provider Score | 78 |
Hospital Score | 63 |
Travel Score | 43 |
15951 | Saint Michael | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis will focus on the availability and quality of asthma care within ZIP Code 15951, encompassing the Saint Michael area. It will evaluate the landscape of primary care, emphasizing factors crucial for asthma management, such as physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the integration of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources, all of which contribute to an overall "Asthma Score" assessment.
The foundation of effective asthma management rests on accessible and readily available primary care. Within Saint Michael, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per resident, can translate to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially compromised care quality. Conversely, a favorable ratio facilitates more frequent check-ups, allowing for proactive management and early intervention, vital for asthma sufferers. Publicly available data, such as that provided by the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), would be instrumental in determining the precise ratio for 15951. This data, combined with information on the number of practicing primary care physicians within the ZIP code, allows for a preliminary assessment of the accessibility of care.
Identifying standout practices is another key component of the Asthma Score. These practices often distinguish themselves through specific attributes. They might offer extended hours, including evening or weekend appointments, catering to the needs of patients who may experience asthma exacerbations outside of standard business hours. They could also have dedicated asthma educators or respiratory therapists on staff, providing specialized knowledge and support to patients in managing their condition. Furthermore, practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education, offering resources on triggers, medication adherence, and self-management techniques, are highly valued. Reviews from patients, alongside information from local healthcare organizations, are valuable in identifying these high-performing practices.
The adoption of telemedicine is increasingly important in modern healthcare, and its impact on asthma care is significant. Telemedicine offers several advantages, including the ability to conduct virtual consultations, monitor patients' conditions remotely, and provide timely interventions. For asthma patients, telemedicine can be particularly beneficial, allowing for regular check-ins to assess symptom control, adjust medications, and provide guidance on managing exacerbations. The Asthma Score would consider the extent to which practices in 15951 have embraced telemedicine, including the availability of virtual appointments, remote monitoring capabilities, and the integration of telehealth platforms into their overall care delivery model. Practices demonstrating a robust telemedicine presence would receive higher scores.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in the context of asthma management, but their impact on patient outcomes is undeniable. Asthma can be a chronic and debilitating condition, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The Asthma Score must therefore assess the availability of mental health support for patients in 15951. This includes the presence of on-site mental health professionals, referrals to local therapists or psychiatrists, and the integration of mental health screening into routine asthma care. Practices that recognize the importance of mental well-being and provide access to relevant resources would be prioritized.
The overall Asthma Score for doctors in 15951, and primary care availability in Saint Michael, would be a composite measure, weighted by the factors discussed above. Physician-to-patient ratio would be a significant component, reflecting the accessibility of care. The presence of standout practices, with their specialized services and patient-centered approach, would contribute substantially to the score. Telemedicine adoption, reflecting the ability to provide convenient and timely care, would also be a key factor. Finally, the availability of mental health resources, acknowledging the holistic needs of asthma patients, would round out the assessment.
This score would not be a static number but rather a dynamic reflection of the healthcare landscape in 15951. Regular updates, based on data collection and analysis, would be essential to ensure its accuracy and relevance. The score could be used by patients to make informed decisions about their care, by healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement, and by policymakers to allocate resources effectively. It would serve as a valuable tool for improving asthma care in the Saint Michael area.
The methodology for calculating the Asthma Score would involve a multi-faceted approach. Data collection would include publicly available information from government agencies, such as HRSA and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Patient reviews and feedback from local healthcare organizations would provide valuable insights into the quality of care. Direct surveys of primary care practices in 15951 would gather information on their services, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. All of this data would be analyzed and weighted to generate the final score.
The limitations of this analysis should also be acknowledged. The Asthma Score would be based on available data, and its accuracy would be dependent on the quality and completeness of that data. The score would be a snapshot in time, and the healthcare landscape is constantly evolving. The score would also be a generalization, and individual patient experiences may vary. Despite these limitations, the Asthma Score would provide a valuable framework for assessing and improving asthma care in the Saint Michael area.
The ultimate goal of this analysis is to improve the quality of life for asthma patients in Saint Michael. By identifying areas of strength and weakness in the local healthcare system, the Asthma Score can help to guide improvements in care delivery. The focus on physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources reflects a comprehensive approach to asthma management.
Are you interested in visualizing the data discussed in this analysis, including physician locations, practice details, and resource availability within ZIP Code 15951? Explore the power of geospatial data with CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides interactive and informative visualizations that can help you better understand the healthcare landscape in your area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like