The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 15952, Salix, Pennsylvania is 78 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 96.93 percent of the residents in 15952 has some form of health insurance. 40.15 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.38 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 15952 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 350 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 15952. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 331 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,682 health care providers accessible to residents in 15952, Salix, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 15952, Salix, Pennsylvania
| Asthma Score | 92 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 72 |
| Provider Score | 78 |
| Hospital Score | 59 |
| Travel Score | 57 |
| 15952 | Salix | Pennsylvania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: 15952 & Salix Primary Care
This analysis delves into the availability and quality of asthma care within ZIP code 15952 (which encompasses the town of Salix, Pennsylvania) focusing on primary care physicians and related resources. We will assess the landscape, considering factors like physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health services, ultimately providing an “Asthma Score” perspective.
The core of effective asthma management relies heavily on accessible and quality primary care. Salix, a small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities in this regard. The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial metric. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per resident, can translate into longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnoses. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the US Census Bureau can provide an initial estimate of this ratio within 15952. However, this data alone is insufficient. We need to consider the actual *availability* of these physicians. Do they accept new patients? What are their appointment scheduling practices? Do they specialize in asthma or have experience treating it?
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of primary care significantly impacts asthma management. Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive. This involves analyzing patient reviews, assessing the types of services offered (e.g., pulmonary function testing, allergy testing), and understanding the practice’s commitment to patient education and preventative care. Practices that proactively address asthma triggers within the home environment, provide comprehensive asthma action plans, and offer regular follow-up appointments are more likely to achieve better patient outcomes. Furthermore, understanding the practice’s adherence to national asthma guidelines, such as those from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), is critical.
Telemedicine adoption represents a significant factor in improving asthma care, especially in rural communities like Salix. Telemedicine allows patients to consult with their physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel, which can be a major barrier to care, especially during an asthma exacerbation. This also allows for more frequent check-ins, enabling physicians to monitor patient symptoms, adjust medication regimens, and provide timely interventions. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption requires examining the practices' telehealth capabilities, including the types of services offered (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring), the availability of technical support for patients, and the insurance coverage for these services.
The link between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in individuals with asthma, and these conditions can worsen asthma symptoms and reduce adherence to treatment plans. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources within primary care is essential. This includes assessing whether practices have on-site mental health professionals, offer referrals to mental health specialists, or utilize screening tools to identify patients who may benefit from mental health support. Practices that actively address the psychological well-being of their patients are more likely to achieve better asthma control.
Evaluating the “Asthma Score” for 15952 requires a holistic approach, considering all the aforementioned factors. A high score would indicate a strong primary care infrastructure with a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, readily accessible and high-quality practices, widespread telemedicine adoption, and robust mental health integration. A low score would suggest the opposite – limited access to care, practices lacking in key services, minimal telemedicine utilization, and a lack of mental health support.
The specific practices within 15952 and their individual scores will influence the overall “Asthma Score”. Identifying the strengths and weaknesses of each practice is crucial. For example, a practice with a high physician-to-patient ratio but limited telemedicine capabilities might receive a moderate score. Conversely, a practice with a lower ratio but strong telemedicine adoption and mental health integration could receive a higher score. The weighting of each factor (physician-to-patient ratio, practice quality, telemedicine, and mental health integration) will also influence the final score. This weighting should be based on evidence-based research, prioritizing factors that have the greatest impact on asthma outcomes.
Further, the availability of specialized asthma care within the broader region should be considered. While primary care is the cornerstone, access to pulmonologists and allergists is often necessary for complex cases. The proximity of these specialists, their acceptance of new patients, and the ease of referral from primary care practices are essential components of a comprehensive asthma care system.
The "Asthma Score" is not just a number; it's a reflection of the community's commitment to providing quality asthma care. It can be used to identify areas for improvement, inform resource allocation, and guide policy decisions. This score should be regularly updated to track progress and ensure that residents of 15952 receive the best possible care.
To truly understand the spatial dynamics of asthma care in 15952 and the surrounding areas, visualization is key. Cartographic representations can illuminate patterns of access, identify areas with limited resources, and help to pinpoint opportunities for improvement.
Ready to visualize the landscape of asthma care in 15952 and beyond? Explore the power of data visualization with CartoChrome maps. Gain a comprehensive, spatially-informed understanding of healthcare access and resource distribution.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like