16063, Zelienople, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16063, Zelienople, Pennsylvania is 60 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.51 percent of the residents in 16063 has some form of health insurance. 29.03 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 84.17 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16063 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,752 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 7 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16063. An estimate of 12 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,792 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,707 health care providers accessible to residents in 16063, Zelienople, Pennsylvania.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Zelienople, PA (ZIP Code 16063)

Analyzing the asthma care landscape within Zelienople, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 16063) requires a multi-faceted approach. We need to assess not only the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) but also the specific resources and practices geared towards asthma management. This analysis, therefore, will consider physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of asthma care. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive "Asthma Score" assessment, offering insights for residents seeking optimal care.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical starting point. The availability of PCPs directly impacts access to care, including initial diagnoses, ongoing management, and referrals to specialists like pulmonologists or allergists. While specific, publicly available data on physician-to-patient ratios *within* 16063 is often limited, we can leverage broader county-level data (Butler County) and cross-reference it with information on local practices. A lower physician-to-patient ratio generally indicates better access. We must consider the number of PCPs actively practicing in the area, their patient load, and whether they are accepting new patients. This data, when compiled, helps determine if there's a sufficient number of PCPs to meet the needs of the community, especially considering the prevalence of asthma.

Identifying standout practices is crucial for understanding the quality of care. This involves evaluating factors beyond just the number of physicians. We need to consider the practices' commitment to asthma management, including their use of evidence-based guidelines, patient education programs, and the integration of technology. Do these practices offer comprehensive asthma action plans tailored to individual patients? Do they have dedicated staff trained in asthma education? Are they actively involved in patient outreach and follow-up care? Practices that demonstrate these characteristics are likely to achieve better patient outcomes. Reviewing patient testimonials, online reviews, and information provided by health insurance providers can reveal valuable insights into the quality of care offered.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly important, especially for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine can improve access to care, particularly for patients with mobility issues or those living in rural areas. Does the practice offer virtual consultations for routine check-ups or medication adjustments? Are they using remote monitoring devices to track patient symptoms and provide real-time feedback? Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient convenience and potentially reduce the frequency of in-person visits, which is particularly beneficial during times of heightened respiratory illness. The availability of telehealth services can significantly impact the Asthma Score.

The often-overlooked aspect of asthma management is the integration of mental health resources. Asthma is a chronic condition that can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities. The best practices are those that recognize the connection between physical and mental health. Do the practices offer mental health screenings? Do they have referrals to mental health professionals who specialize in chronic illness? Are they actively collaborating with mental health providers to provide integrated care? The availability and integration of mental health resources are crucial for comprehensive asthma management and contribute significantly to the overall Asthma Score.

Evaluating the asthma care landscape in Zelienople also requires an understanding of the local infrastructure. Does the community have access to specialized asthma care, such as pulmonologists or allergists? Are there local pharmacies that offer asthma-specific services, such as medication counseling or inhaler technique training? The availability of these resources complements the care provided by PCPs and contributes to a more comprehensive approach to asthma management. Collaboration between PCPs, specialists, and pharmacists is essential for optimal patient outcomes.

The Asthma Score, in essence, is a composite metric that reflects the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care in Zelienople. It is not a single number, but rather a holistic assessment based on the factors discussed above. A high Asthma Score would indicate a community with a sufficient number of PCPs, standout practices that utilize evidence-based guidelines and technology, widespread telemedicine adoption, integrated mental health resources, and a strong network of specialists and pharmacies. Conversely, a low Asthma Score would suggest limited access to care, a lack of specialized resources, and a less comprehensive approach to asthma management.

To accurately assess the Asthma Score, detailed data collection and analysis are essential. This involves gathering information on physician-to-patient ratios, evaluating practice profiles, assessing telemedicine adoption rates, and determining the availability of mental health resources. Public health data, insurance provider information, and patient feedback are all valuable sources of information. The analysis should consider the specific needs of the community, including the demographics of the population and the prevalence of asthma.

The findings of this analysis can be used to inform healthcare planning, patient education, and community outreach efforts. It can also be used to identify areas for improvement and to advocate for increased resources for asthma care. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the current system, we can work towards creating a healthier environment for individuals with asthma in Zelienople.

For a visual representation of this data, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and resource availability, explore the interactive maps available on CartoChrome. CartoChrome provides a powerful platform for visualizing and analyzing healthcare data, allowing you to gain a deeper understanding of the asthma care landscape in Zelienople and beyond.