The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16101, New Castle, Pennsylvania is 59 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 93.04 percent of the residents in 16101 has some form of health insurance. 53.13 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 57.38 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16101 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 6,703 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 8 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16101. An estimate of 12 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 6,494 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 6,860 health care providers accessible to residents in 16101, New Castle, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16101, New Castle, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 14 |
---|---|
People Score | 6 |
Provider Score | 59 |
Hospital Score | 30 |
Travel Score | 35 |
16101 | New Castle | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: New Castle, PA (ZIP Code 16101)
Analyzing the availability and quality of asthma care within New Castle, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 16101) requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis considers physician access, practice characteristics, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, all crucial elements in managing a chronic respiratory condition like asthma. A comprehensive 'Asthma Score' is inherently complex, but we can assess key factors to provide a nuanced understanding of the landscape.
The foundation of any asthma care system lies in accessible primary care. In New Castle, evaluating primary care availability necessitates examining the physician-to-patient ratio. While precise figures fluctuate, the general trend suggests a potential challenge. A lower ratio, indicating fewer primary care physicians per capita, can translate into longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnosis or treatment adjustments for asthma sufferers. This directly impacts the ability to proactively manage asthma symptoms and prevent exacerbations.
Furthermore, the distribution of primary care physicians within the ZIP code is essential. Are practices concentrated in specific areas, potentially creating access disparities for residents in other parts of New Castle? Understanding the geographic distribution is critical to identifying underserved populations and informing strategies to improve access to care. This includes considering the presence of federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) or other safety-net providers that often serve a higher proportion of patients with chronic conditions like asthma.
Beyond mere availability, the characteristics of primary care practices significantly influence asthma management. We must consider the presence of board-certified allergists and pulmonologists, specialists essential for complex asthma cases. Are these specialists readily accessible within the community, or do patients need to travel outside the ZIP code for specialized care? The availability of in-house respiratory therapists, who provide essential education and support for asthma patients, is another crucial factor.
Standout practices in New Castle, if any, would demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive asthma care. This includes implementing evidence-based asthma management guidelines, providing patient education on triggers and medication adherence, and offering regular follow-up appointments to monitor symptom control. Practices that proactively utilize asthma action plans, personalized roadmaps for managing symptoms and responding to exacerbations, are particularly valuable.
The integration of telemedicine is increasingly vital, especially for managing chronic conditions. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring of asthma symptoms. Practices that have embraced telemedicine offer greater flexibility and convenience for patients, particularly those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. Examining the adoption rate of telemedicine within primary care practices in 16101 is a key indicator of the accessibility and responsiveness of asthma care.
Moreover, the link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Anxiety and depression can worsen asthma symptoms, and conversely, the physical challenges of asthma can contribute to mental health issues. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the primary care setting or through readily accessible referrals is crucial. Practices that screen for mental health concerns and offer integrated behavioral health services are better equipped to provide holistic care for asthma patients. This includes assessing the availability of therapists, psychiatrists, and support groups within the community.
Evaluating the insurance landscape is also important. Does the majority of primary care physicians accept a wide variety of insurance plans, including Medicaid and Medicare? This ensures that all residents, regardless of their socioeconomic status, have access to the care they need. Examining the affordability of medications and the availability of patient assistance programs is also essential.
Assessing the quality of asthma care requires examining patient outcomes. While obtaining specific data is challenging, reviewing publicly available information, such as hospital readmission rates for asthma exacerbations, can provide some insights. Practices with lower readmission rates often demonstrate superior asthma management strategies. This data, when available, provides a valuable benchmark for evaluating the effectiveness of care within the community.
The overall 'Asthma Score' for New Castle (ZIP code 16101) is therefore a composite of these factors. A high score would reflect a robust system with a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, readily accessible specialists, widespread telemedicine adoption, integrated mental health resources, and a commitment to evidence-based asthma management. A lower score would indicate areas for improvement, such as limited physician access, a lack of telemedicine options, or inadequate mental health support.
This analysis is a snapshot, and the landscape of healthcare is constantly evolving. It is crucial to regularly update this assessment to reflect changes in physician availability, practice characteristics, and the adoption of new technologies. Continued monitoring and evaluation are essential to ensure that residents of New Castle have access to the best possible asthma care.
To gain a deeper understanding of the geographic distribution of primary care physicians, the location of specialists, and the availability of resources within New Castle, consider using CartoChrome maps. Explore the interactive visualizations to identify areas with limited access to care and inform strategies for improving asthma management within the community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like