The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16236, Mc Grann, Pennsylvania is 20 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 89.06 percent of the residents in 16236 has some form of health insurance. 61.51 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 55.85 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16236 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 52 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16236. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 75 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 649 health care providers accessible to residents in 16236, Mc Grann, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16236, Mc Grann, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 67 |
---|---|
People Score | 98 |
Provider Score | 20 |
Hospital Score | 49 |
Travel Score | 50 |
16236 | Mc Grann | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing the healthcare landscape for asthma sufferers in and around Mc Grann, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 16236) requires a multifaceted approach. We must delve into the availability of primary care physicians, assess the quality of asthma management, and consider the accessibility of specialized services. This analysis will provide an "Asthma Score" assessment, offering insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system for individuals managing this chronic respiratory condition.
The foundation of asthma care rests on accessible and responsive primary care. In Mc Grann, understanding physician-to-patient ratios is crucial. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying necessary interventions for asthma exacerbations. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater access, allowing for more proactive and preventative care. Data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and local hospital networks are essential to determine these ratios accurately. Public health data can also reveal the prevalence of asthma within the community, further contextualizing the demand for primary care services.
Beyond raw numbers, the quality of primary care practices significantly impacts asthma management. We need to evaluate the practices' adherence to national guidelines for asthma care, such as those established by the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Key indicators include the availability of spirometry testing (a lung function test), the provision of asthma action plans, and regular patient education on medication use and environmental triggers. Practices that actively engage in patient education, offer personalized asthma management plans, and proactively address potential triggers are likely to receive higher scores.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. Telemedicine offers the potential to improve access to care, especially for individuals in rural areas like Mc Grann. Virtual consultations can facilitate medication refills, provide asthma education, and monitor patients' conditions remotely. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their asthma management protocols deserve recognition. This includes assessing the ease of use of the telemedicine platform, the availability of virtual appointments, and the integration of telemedicine data with the patient's electronic health record.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma care, but they are crucial. Asthma can significantly impact a person's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Assessing the availability of mental health services, such as therapists and counselors, within the primary care practices or through referrals is essential. Practices that prioritize mental health screening and offer integrated mental health support are better equipped to provide comprehensive asthma care.
Specific practices in the 16236 ZIP code and surrounding areas warrant individual evaluation. Identifying "standout practices" requires a review of patient reviews, physician qualifications, and the availability of specialized asthma care. These practices should be recognized for their commitment to asthma management, patient education, and their use of innovative technologies. This could include practices that have a dedicated asthma educator, offer evening or weekend appointments, or actively participate in asthma research or quality improvement initiatives.
To assess the overall "Asthma Score," we must combine these factors. The score should reflect the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. Each factor should be weighted appropriately based on its impact on patient outcomes. For example, a low physician-to-patient ratio might negatively affect the score, while a practice's commitment to patient education could positively influence it. The final score would provide a snapshot of the healthcare landscape for asthma sufferers in the Mc Grann area.
Analyzing the accessibility of primary care specifically in Mc Grann requires a localized approach. While ZIP code data provides a general overview, the geographic distribution of physicians within Mc Grann is important. Factors like transportation limitations, particularly for elderly or disabled patients, should be considered. Is there public transportation? Are there transportation services that assist patients in accessing healthcare? This assessment also includes the availability of pharmacies in Mc Grann and their proximity to primary care practices.
The impact of hospital systems on asthma care cannot be ignored. The presence of a nearby hospital with a dedicated respiratory department and emergency services is crucial for managing severe asthma exacerbations. The hospital's ability to provide rapid access to care, specialized treatments, and follow-up care can significantly improve patient outcomes. This includes assessing the hospital's asthma readmission rates, the availability of specialized asthma clinics, and its commitment to community outreach programs.
Finally, we need to consider the broader community context. The prevalence of environmental triggers, such as air pollution and allergens, can significantly impact asthma control. Assessing the local air quality, the presence of industrial facilities, and the availability of community resources for asthma education and support are all important factors. Community partnerships, such as collaborations with schools, community centers, and local advocacy groups, can enhance asthma management.
In conclusion, evaluating the "Asthma Score" for doctors in ZIP code 16236 and primary care availability in Mc Grann requires a comprehensive assessment. It involves analyzing physician-to-patient ratios, evaluating the quality of primary care practices, assessing telemedicine adoption, and considering the availability of mental health resources. This analysis provides a framework for understanding the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system for asthma sufferers.
For a visual representation of this healthcare landscape, including the geographic distribution of physicians, pharmacies, and environmental factors, we encourage you to explore the power of CartoChrome maps. Visualize the data and gain deeper insights into the accessibility and quality of asthma care in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like