16240, Mayport, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16240, Mayport, Pennsylvania is 38 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 91.66 percent of the residents in 16240 has some form of health insurance. 40.18 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.81 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16240 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 473 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16240. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 230 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 460 health care providers accessible to residents in 16240, Mayport, Pennsylvania.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Mayport, PA (ZIP Code 16240)

This analysis delves into the landscape of asthma care within Mayport, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 16240), evaluating the availability and quality of primary care services, with a specific focus on asthma management. We will assess the physician-to-patient ratio, identify standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and investigate the presence of mental health resources, all critical components in providing comprehensive asthma care.

The foundation of effective asthma management rests upon accessible primary care. In Mayport, the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial factor. A high ratio, indicating a limited number of physicians relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time spent with each patient, and potentially, delayed diagnoses or treatment adjustments. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility and the potential for more personalized care. Assessing this ratio requires analyzing the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing within the ZIP code and comparing it to the population size. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the US Census Bureau provides the necessary information for these calculations.

Identifying practices with a strong track record in asthma care is paramount. This involves evaluating several key metrics. First, the practice's commitment to evidence-based asthma guidelines, such as those established by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), is essential. Practices adhering to these guidelines are more likely to provide up-to-date and effective treatment strategies. Second, the availability of specialized equipment, such as peak flow meters and spirometry, is crucial for accurate diagnosis and monitoring. Third, patient outcomes, including rates of asthma exacerbations, hospitalizations, and emergency room visits, offer a valuable insight into the practice's effectiveness. Data on these outcomes, while often challenging to obtain, can be gleaned from patient surveys, public health reports, or through direct inquiries with practices.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in rural areas. Telemedicine offers the potential to improve access to care, especially for patients who face geographical barriers or mobility limitations. For asthma management, telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, medication management, and patient education. Assessing telemedicine adoption in Mayport requires identifying which primary care practices offer these services, the types of telemedicine platforms they utilize, and the frequency with which they are employed. Information on patient satisfaction with telemedicine services is also valuable.

The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Asthma can contribute to anxiety and depression, while mental health challenges can exacerbate asthma symptoms and impact treatment adherence. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is a critical component of comprehensive asthma care. This analysis must evaluate the presence of mental health professionals within primary care practices, such as psychologists or counselors, or the availability of referrals to external mental health providers. The integration of mental health services into asthma care can significantly improve patient outcomes and quality of life.

Beyond the core components of care, other factors contribute to the overall asthma score. Patient education is essential. Practices that provide comprehensive asthma education, including information on triggers, medication use, and self-management strategies, empower patients to take an active role in their care. The availability of bilingual services can also enhance access for non-English speaking patients. Furthermore, the practice's responsiveness to patient needs, as reflected in patient reviews and feedback, is a key indicator of quality.

The analysis must consider the specific challenges faced by the Mayport community. Rural areas often experience disparities in healthcare access, including limited transportation options and a shortage of specialists. Understanding these challenges allows for a more nuanced assessment of the available resources and the effectiveness of current care models. Community health initiatives and collaborations between healthcare providers, schools, and community organizations can play a vital role in improving asthma outcomes.

Evaluating the quality of care requires a multi-faceted approach. Relying solely on a single metric, such as the physician-to-patient ratio, would provide an incomplete picture. Instead, a comprehensive analysis should consider a range of factors, including access, quality, and patient satisfaction. Data collection from various sources, including public health records, patient surveys, and direct inquiries with practices, is essential.

The final Asthma Score should reflect the overall quality of asthma care in Mayport. This score could be presented as a numerical value or a descriptive rating, such as "Excellent," "Good," "Fair," or "Poor." The score should be accompanied by a detailed explanation of the methodology used and the rationale behind the rating. The analysis should identify areas of strength and weakness in the current healthcare landscape and suggest recommendations for improvement.

The identification of standout practices is a key component of the analysis. These practices should be recognized for their commitment to evidence-based care, patient-centered approaches, and positive outcomes. Highlighting these practices can serve as a model for other providers and encourage the adoption of best practices throughout the community.

The analysis should also identify gaps in care and areas where improvements are needed. This could include a shortage of specialists, limited access to mental health services, or a lack of patient education resources. Addressing these gaps requires collaborative efforts from healthcare providers, community organizations, and policymakers.

Ultimately, the goal of this Asthma Score analysis is to provide a comprehensive assessment of the asthma care landscape in Mayport, Pennsylvania. This information can be used to inform patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers, leading to improved access, quality, and outcomes for individuals living with asthma.

To visualize the healthcare landscape of Mayport and surrounding areas, including physician locations, practice specializations, and resource availability, we encourage you to explore the power of interactive mapping.

**Click here to discover the possibilities with CartoChrome maps and gain a deeper understanding of healthcare accessibility in your community.**