16332, Lickingville, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16332, Lickingville, Pennsylvania is 57 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 93.18 percent of the residents in 16332 has some form of health insurance. 40.91 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.45 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16332 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16332. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 8 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 671 health care providers accessible to residents in 16332, Lickingville, Pennsylvania.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16332 and Primary Care in Lickingville

Analyzing the availability of quality healthcare, particularly concerning asthma management, in a specific geographic area requires a multi-faceted approach. This analysis will focus on ZIP code 16332, encompassing a portion of Lickingville, Pennsylvania, and assess the landscape of primary care physicians (PCPs) and related resources crucial for asthma sufferers. The aim is to provide an "Asthma Score" perspective, evaluating the accessibility and quality of care.

The foundation of asthma management hinges on accessible and well-equipped primary care. Evaluating the physician-to-patient ratio in 16332 is a critical first step. Publicly available data, such as that from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or the Pennsylvania Department of Health, can provide insights into the number of PCPs practicing within the ZIP code and the overall population. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally suggests greater access to care. However, this raw number needs context. The age distribution of the population in 16332 is important. A population with a higher proportion of children and older adults, both demographics at increased risk for asthma, would necessitate a higher concentration of PCPs specializing in those age groups.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of care is essential. This involves evaluating the practices of the PCPs within the area. Do they have a demonstrated commitment to asthma management? Do they adhere to the latest guidelines from organizations like the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA)? Do they offer comprehensive asthma action plans, patient education, and regular follow-up appointments? These are all factors that contribute to a higher "Asthma Score." Researching physician profiles through online directories, patient reviews, and potentially contacting local healthcare advocacy groups can provide valuable insights into the practices of individual physicians.

The presence of specialist care, such as pulmonologists and allergists, is another vital component of asthma management. While PCPs often serve as the first point of contact, access to specialists for more complex cases or diagnostic needs is crucial. Examining the proximity of specialists to 16332 and the ease with which patients can access them is a key consideration. This might involve assessing travel times, insurance network coverage, and the availability of appointment slots. A higher concentration of specialists and ease of access contribute to a better "Asthma Score."

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly relevant in healthcare, particularly for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine can improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Assessing the adoption of telemedicine by PCPs in 16332 is important. Do they offer virtual consultations for medication refills, follow-up appointments, or asthma education? The availability of telemedicine services can significantly improve the "Asthma Score" by making care more convenient and accessible.

Mental health resources are an often-overlooked, yet critical, component of asthma management. Asthma can be a stressful condition, leading to anxiety and depression. Assessing the availability of mental health services in 16332 is therefore crucial. Are there mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, available in the area? Are these services integrated with primary care, allowing for seamless referrals and coordinated care? The presence of readily accessible mental health resources can significantly improve the overall well-being of asthma patients and positively impact the "Asthma Score."

Furthermore, examining the availability of ancillary services is essential. Does the area have pharmacies that stock a wide range of asthma medications and inhalers? Are there respiratory therapists available for pulmonary function testing and patient education? The availability of these support services enhances the overall quality of care and contributes to a higher "Asthma Score."

The "Asthma Score" for 16332, therefore, is not a simple number but a composite measure based on several factors. It reflects the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of primary care practices, access to specialists, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and the availability of ancillary services. A high score indicates a healthcare environment that is well-equipped to manage asthma effectively, while a low score suggests areas for improvement.

To get a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape in 16332 and Lickingville, including detailed information on physician locations, access to specialists, and the availability of various healthcare services, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. These maps provide a visual representation of the healthcare infrastructure, allowing you to analyze the distribution of resources and identify potential gaps in care.