16334, Marble, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16334, Marble, Pennsylvania is 50 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 97.82 percent of the residents in 16334 has some form of health insurance. 32.04 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 79.85 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16334 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 86 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16334. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 105 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 554 health care providers accessible to residents in 16334, Marble, Pennsylvania.

The analysis below explores asthma care quality and primary care accessibility within the context of Marble, Pennsylvania, specifically focusing on ZIP code 16334. This evaluation considers physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health support, culminating in a call to action for a powerful mapping solution.

Marble, Pennsylvania, a small community, presents unique challenges and opportunities regarding healthcare delivery. The prevalence of asthma, like other respiratory conditions, can be influenced by environmental factors, socioeconomic conditions, and access to quality care. Analyzing the healthcare landscape within ZIP code 16334 requires a nuanced understanding of these variables.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a crucial indicator of accessibility. A low ratio, meaning a smaller number of physicians serving a larger population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially compromised care. Data on physician distribution within 16334, including primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and allergists, is essential. Publicly available data from sources like the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) and state medical boards can provide insights into the number of active practitioners and their specialties. This data, however, needs to be interpreted in the context of the community’s demographics and healthcare utilization patterns.

Identifying standout practices requires evaluating several factors. These include the quality of asthma management protocols, patient satisfaction scores, and the integration of technology to improve care. Practices that actively participate in asthma education programs, offer comprehensive patient education materials, and utilize electronic health records (EHRs) effectively are more likely to provide superior care. Reviews from patients, available on platforms like Healthgrades or Vitals, can offer valuable perspectives on the patient experience. Furthermore, practices that demonstrate a commitment to continuous quality improvement, such as through participation in asthma registries or quality improvement initiatives, often stand out.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in rural areas like Marble. Telemedicine can improve access to care by reducing the need for travel, especially for follow-up appointments or consultations. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves examining which practices offer virtual visits, the types of services provided remotely, and the technology infrastructure in place. Practices that use secure video conferencing platforms, offer remote monitoring capabilities, and integrate telemedicine into their care workflows are likely to be more effective. The accessibility of telemedicine is also influenced by factors like internet connectivity within the community and the availability of technology support for patients.

The integration of mental health resources is a critical aspect of asthma care. Asthma can significantly impact a person’s mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that recognize this connection and provide access to mental health services, either through in-house therapists or referrals to external providers, are better equipped to provide comprehensive care. Evaluating mental health resource availability involves assessing whether practices screen patients for mental health conditions, offer counseling services, and have established referral pathways to psychiatrists or therapists.

Analyzing the specific healthcare landscape in 16334 requires a deep dive into local data. This includes reviewing publicly available information, contacting healthcare providers directly, and potentially conducting patient surveys. The analysis should consider the unique characteristics of the community, such as its demographics, environmental factors, and socioeconomic conditions. This comprehensive approach allows for a more accurate assessment of asthma care quality and primary care accessibility.

The information gathered can be used to create an "Asthma Score" ranking for doctors in the ZIP code. This score should be based on a weighted average of the factors discussed above, including physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of asthma management protocols, patient satisfaction, telemedicine adoption, and the availability of mental health resources. The weighting of each factor should reflect its relative importance in determining the quality of care.

The final Asthma Score ranking can be used to inform patients about the quality of care available in their community. It can also be used by healthcare providers to identify areas for improvement and to benchmark their performance against other practices. Furthermore, the analysis can be used by policymakers and healthcare organizations to identify areas where resources are needed to improve access to care and to support the development of effective asthma management programs.

The analysis should also consider the primary care availability in Marble. Primary care physicians play a crucial role in managing asthma, providing preventive care, and coordinating care with specialists. Assessing primary care availability involves evaluating the number of primary care physicians in the community, their appointment availability, and their ability to provide comprehensive care. The analysis should also consider the presence of other healthcare providers, such as nurse practitioners and physician assistants, who can provide primary care services.

The evaluation of primary care availability should be integrated with the asthma care analysis. This is because primary care physicians often serve as the first point of contact for patients with asthma. They are responsible for diagnosing the condition, developing treatment plans, and providing ongoing care. The availability of primary care physicians can therefore significantly impact the quality of asthma care.

In conclusion, assessing asthma care in 16334 and primary care availability in Marble requires a comprehensive approach. This includes analyzing physician-to-patient ratios, identifying standout practices, evaluating telemedicine adoption, and assessing the integration of mental health resources. The development of an Asthma Score ranking can provide valuable insights into the quality of care available in the community.

To visualize this complex data and gain a deeper understanding of healthcare access in Marble, Pennsylvania, and surrounding areas, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. These powerful mapping solutions allow you to overlay demographic data, healthcare provider locations, and other relevant information to create interactive visualizations. This will help you identify patterns, trends, and areas of need, ultimately improving healthcare decision-making. Explore the possibilities of CartoChrome maps to gain a more comprehensive view of the healthcare landscape.