16410, Cranesville, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16410, Cranesville, Pennsylvania is 86 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 95.13 percent of the residents in 16410 has some form of health insurance. 31.30 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 78.07 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16410 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 429 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16410. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 311 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 625 health care providers accessible to residents in 16410, Cranesville, Pennsylvania.

**Asthma Score Analysis: Cranesville, PA (ZIP Code 16410)**

Cranesville, Pennsylvania, a small community nestled within ZIP code 16410, presents a unique healthcare landscape. Assessing the quality of asthma care and primary care availability requires a multi-faceted approach, considering factors beyond simple physician counts. This analysis aims to provide an "Asthma Score" ranking for doctors in the area, considering physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The goal is to offer a comprehensive overview, guiding residents towards the best possible care.

The foundation of any healthcare assessment lies in understanding physician availability. In Cranesville, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. While precise figures fluctuate, the limited population size of Cranesville suggests a potentially lower number of practicing physicians compared to more densely populated areas. This impacts access to care, particularly for chronic conditions like asthma, which require regular monitoring and management. The ratio directly affects appointment wait times, the ability to establish a strong patient-physician relationship, and overall healthcare accessibility.

Beyond the raw numbers, the characteristics of the primary care practices themselves are crucial. Are practices accepting new patients? Do they offer extended hours or weekend appointments? Do they have specialized staff, such as respiratory therapists or certified asthma educators? These factors significantly influence the quality of care. Practices that prioritize patient education, proactive asthma management plans, and readily available resources are likely to score higher on an "Asthma Score" assessment. The availability of electronic health records (EHRs) also plays a vital role, enabling seamless communication between providers and facilitating efficient care coordination.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, especially in rural areas like Cranesville. Telemedicine offers a lifeline for patients, reducing the need for travel, especially for routine follow-up appointments. Practices that embrace telemedicine, offering virtual consultations and remote monitoring tools, demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and accessibility. For asthma patients, telemedicine can facilitate medication adjustments, provide education on inhaler techniques, and monitor symptom control, improving overall disease management. Practices that offer telemedicine options would likely score higher on the "Asthma Score" due to their increased accessibility.

The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in asthma patients, impacting disease control and quality of life. Therefore, the integration of mental health resources within primary care practices is a significant factor in assessing asthma care quality. Practices that offer on-site mental health services, referrals to mental health professionals, or incorporate mental health screenings into routine care demonstrate a holistic approach to patient well-being. This integration is crucial for addressing the psychological impact of asthma and optimizing treatment outcomes. Practices that actively address mental health needs would receive a higher "Asthma Score."

Standout practices within Cranesville would likely be those that excel in multiple areas. They would ideally have a reasonable physician-to-patient ratio, be accepting new patients, and offer extended hours. They would prioritize patient education, providing asthma management plans and access to respiratory therapists. They would embrace telemedicine, offering virtual consultations and remote monitoring options. Most importantly, they would integrate mental health resources, either directly or through strong referral networks. Identifying these practices requires careful investigation, including patient reviews, practice websites, and direct communication with the practices themselves.

Evaluating the quality of asthma care in Cranesville also involves considering the broader healthcare ecosystem. The availability of specialist referrals, access to emergency services, and the presence of community resources like support groups all contribute to the overall patient experience. The ability of primary care physicians to effectively coordinate care with specialists is particularly important for asthma patients with complex conditions. A well-coordinated healthcare system ensures that patients receive the appropriate level of care at the right time.

The "Asthma Score" analysis for Cranesville would not be a static number but a dynamic assessment, reflecting the ever-changing healthcare landscape. Regular updates are necessary to account for changes in physician availability, practice characteristics, and the adoption of new technologies. The score would be a valuable tool for residents seeking asthma care, helping them make informed decisions about their healthcare. It would also provide valuable feedback to healthcare providers, highlighting areas for improvement and encouraging the adoption of best practices.

The process of creating this "Asthma Score" would involve gathering data from various sources. Publicly available information, such as physician directories and practice websites, would be a starting point. Patient surveys and reviews would provide valuable insights into patient experiences. Direct communication with primary care practices would be essential to gather detailed information about their services and resources. This data would then be analyzed and weighted, based on the factors discussed above, to generate a comprehensive "Asthma Score" for each practice.

In conclusion, assessing the quality of asthma care in Cranesville, PA (ZIP Code 16410), requires a thorough evaluation of physician availability, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. The "Asthma Score" analysis, when implemented, would provide a valuable tool for residents seeking asthma care, guiding them towards the best possible options. The data collection and analysis for this project is complex.

To visualize the healthcare landscape of Cranesville and its surrounding areas, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to resources, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can help you visualize this data and find the best possible care options.