The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16652, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania is 28 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 85.34 percent of the residents in 16652 has some form of health insurance. 39.58 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 64.12 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16652 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,860 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16652. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,086 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 594 health care providers accessible to residents in 16652, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16652, Huntingdon, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 18 |
---|---|
People Score | 16 |
Provider Score | 28 |
Hospital Score | 39 |
Travel Score | 59 |
16652 | Huntingdon | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis below considers the complexities of asthma care within the 16652 ZIP code, focusing on physician availability, resource accessibility, and the overall quality of care. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the landscape for asthma patients in Huntingdon, Pennsylvania, and to highlight areas of strength and potential improvement.
The foundation of asthma care rests on the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). In Huntingdon, the physician-to-patient ratio for PCPs is a critical factor. A low ratio, meaning a scarcity of doctors relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnosis and treatment of asthma. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access, allowing for more frequent check-ups, proactive management, and improved patient outcomes. Determining the precise ratio for 16652 requires data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the American Medical Association. However, it is reasonable to assume that rural areas often face challenges in physician recruitment and retention, which could impact the ratio negatively.
Beyond the sheer number of PCPs, the distribution of those physicians is also vital. Are they concentrated in a single practice or spread throughout the area? A concentration could create a bottleneck for patients, while a dispersed network might require patients to travel further for appointments. The location of practices relative to population density and transportation infrastructure is also crucial. Patients without reliable transportation, or those living in underserved areas, could face significant barriers to accessing care.
Specialty care, particularly pulmonology, is another key component of asthma management. The availability of pulmonologists within the 16652 ZIP code is essential for patients with moderate to severe asthma. These specialists can provide advanced diagnostics, tailored treatment plans, and access to clinical trials. The presence of a pulmonologist often indicates a higher level of asthma care, and the absence of one necessitates referrals to specialists outside the immediate area, potentially adding to patient burden and delay.
Standout practices in the region are those that demonstrate a commitment to comprehensive asthma care. These practices often integrate several key elements. Firstly, they prioritize patient education, empowering individuals to manage their condition effectively through proper inhaler technique instruction, trigger identification, and asthma action plan development. Secondly, they utilize evidence-based guidelines for asthma management, ensuring that patients receive the latest and most effective treatments. Thirdly, they emphasize proactive care, including regular check-ups, monitoring of lung function, and timely adjustments to treatment plans. Finally, they foster a strong patient-physician relationship, building trust and promoting open communication. Identifying these standout practices requires a review of patient testimonials, practice performance metrics, and physician certifications.
Telemedicine adoption has the potential to significantly improve asthma care access in rural areas like Huntingdon. Telemedicine allows patients to connect with their physicians remotely, reducing the need for travel and potentially improving adherence to treatment plans. Video consultations can be used for follow-up appointments, medication reviews, and asthma education sessions. However, the effectiveness of telemedicine depends on several factors, including patient access to technology, internet connectivity, and the willingness of both physicians and patients to embrace this technology. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their workflow are likely to offer a higher level of convenience and accessibility for their asthma patients.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma care, but they are crucial. Asthma can significantly impact a patient’s quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that recognize this and provide access to mental health services, either in-house or through referrals, are better equipped to support their patients holistically. Integrating mental health screenings into routine asthma check-ups can help identify patients who may benefit from additional support. Collaboration between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and mental health professionals is essential for providing comprehensive care.
The availability of support groups and educational programs for asthma patients and their families also contributes to improved outcomes. These resources provide a platform for patients to connect with others, share experiences, and learn coping strategies. Local hospitals, community health centers, and asthma advocacy organizations often offer these programs. The presence of these resources within the 16652 ZIP code indicates a stronger support network for asthma patients.
The overall 'Asthma Score' for doctors in ZIP Code 16652 would be a composite of all these factors. It would reflect the physician-to-patient ratio, the availability of pulmonologists, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the availability of support groups. A higher score would indicate better access to care, more comprehensive services, and a greater likelihood of positive patient outcomes. A lower score would highlight areas that need improvement, such as physician shortages, limited access to specialists, and a lack of integrated care.
The primary care availability in Huntingdon is inextricably linked to the overall asthma care environment. A robust primary care system is the foundation upon which effective asthma management is built. The more accessible and well-resourced the primary care network, the better the outcomes for asthma patients. This includes not only the number of PCPs but also their training, experience, and commitment to asthma care.
To gain a more granular understanding of the healthcare landscape in Huntingdon, including the location of practices, physician specializations, and resource availability, consider exploring interactive mapping tools like CartoChrome maps. These tools can provide a visual representation of the data discussed, allowing for a more informed assessment of the asthma care environment.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like