16673, Roaring Spring, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16673, Roaring Spring, Pennsylvania is 74 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.20 percent of the residents in 16673 has some form of health insurance. 32.87 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 73.57 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16673 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,123 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16673. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 958 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 813 health care providers accessible to residents in 16673, Roaring Spring, Pennsylvania.

**Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 16673 and Primary Care Availability in Roaring Spring**

Roaring Spring, Pennsylvania, nestled within ZIP code 16673, presents a unique landscape for healthcare access, particularly concerning asthma management. This analysis delves into the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), assesses the quality of asthma care, and explores related factors like physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources. The ultimate goal is to provide a comprehensive asthma score analysis, highlighting strengths, weaknesses, and opportunities for improvement within the community.

The cornerstone of effective asthma management is readily accessible primary care. In Roaring Spring, the availability of PCPs directly impacts the ability of residents to receive timely diagnoses, personalized treatment plans, and ongoing monitoring. The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical metric. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced appointment durations, and potentially compromised care quality. Conversely, a favorable ratio fosters better access, allowing for proactive asthma management and improved patient outcomes.

Specific data on physician-to-patient ratios within 16673 is essential for a precise assessment. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the U.S. Census Bureau, combined with information from local healthcare providers, would provide the necessary figures. An unfavorable ratio necessitates strategies to mitigate its impact. These strategies might include recruiting additional physicians, expanding the roles of nurse practitioners and physician assistants, or implementing innovative care models.

Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of care delivered by PCPs is paramount. Asthma management requires a multifaceted approach, encompassing accurate diagnosis, personalized medication plans, education on asthma triggers, and regular follow-up appointments. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to these elements deserve recognition. Standout practices in Roaring Spring would be those that consistently adhere to national guidelines for asthma care, actively engage patients in their treatment plans, and demonstrate positive patient outcomes.

Identifying these standout practices involves examining various factors. Patient satisfaction surveys, reviews, and testimonials offer valuable insights into the patient experience. Analyzing the practice's adherence to asthma guidelines, such as those established by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), is crucial. Furthermore, assessing the practice's use of electronic health records (EHRs) and its ability to coordinate care with specialists, such as pulmonologists, provides a comprehensive picture.

Telemedicine has emerged as a powerful tool for expanding healthcare access, particularly in rural areas like Roaring Spring. The adoption of telemedicine by PCPs can significantly improve asthma management. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring of patients' symptoms. This is especially beneficial for individuals with mobility limitations, transportation challenges, or those residing far from medical facilities.

The degree to which PCPs in 16673 have embraced telemedicine is a key factor in the asthma score analysis. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their workflow should be lauded for their commitment to patient convenience and improved care. The analysis should also consider the types of telemedicine services offered, the ease of use for patients, and the overall impact on patient outcomes.

The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Asthma can contribute to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Conversely, mental health conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms and make it more difficult for patients to manage their condition. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources in Roaring Spring is a crucial component of the asthma score analysis.

The analysis should assess the accessibility of mental health services, including therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists. It should also examine the level of collaboration between PCPs and mental health professionals. Practices that actively screen patients for mental health conditions and offer integrated care, or readily refer patients to mental health specialists, are demonstrating a holistic approach to asthma management.

Specific examples of mental health resources within the community should be highlighted. This includes information on local mental health clinics, support groups, and any programs that address the unique needs of individuals with asthma and co-occurring mental health conditions.

The asthma score analysis for 16673 should synthesize all these factors into a comprehensive assessment. The score could be based on a weighted system, with physician-to-patient ratio, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources each contributing to the overall score. The analysis should clearly articulate the strengths and weaknesses of healthcare access in Roaring Spring, and identify areas where improvement is needed.

The final asthma score should not be a static number but a dynamic representation of the community's healthcare landscape. It should be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect changes in physician availability, advancements in telemedicine, and the evolution of mental health resources. The analysis should also include recommendations for improvement, such as strategies to recruit more physicians, promote telemedicine adoption, and enhance collaboration between PCPs and mental health professionals.

In conclusion, a comprehensive asthma score analysis for 16673 requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves assessing physician-to-patient ratios, evaluating the quality of care delivered by PCPs, examining the adoption of telemedicine, and assessing the availability of mental health resources. By considering these factors, the analysis can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of healthcare access in Roaring Spring and identify opportunities for improvement. The ultimate goal is to improve asthma management and enhance the overall health and well-being of the community.

To visualize the healthcare landscape in Roaring Spring and explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, telemedicine availability, and mental health services, consider using CartoChrome maps. This interactive platform allows for a detailed spatial analysis of healthcare access, enabling you to identify areas with limited resources and visualize opportunities for improvement.