The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16682, Sproul, Pennsylvania is 54 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 16682 has some form of health insurance. 3.57 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 100.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16682 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 24 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16682. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 666 health care providers accessible to residents in 16682, Sproul, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16682, Sproul, Pennsylvania
| Asthma Score | 93 |
|---|---|
| People Score | 98 |
| Provider Score | 54 |
| Hospital Score | 61 |
| Travel Score | 58 |
| 16682 | Sproul | Pennsylvania | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of asthma care and primary care availability within ZIP code 16682, specifically focusing on the Sproul area, necessitates a multi-faceted approach. Evaluating "Asthma Score" involves assessing various factors, including physician density, resource accessibility, and the integration of innovative healthcare delivery models. This analysis will delve into these aspects, providing a nuanced understanding of the healthcare landscape in this specific region.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator of healthcare access. In Sproul (ZIP code 16682), determining the exact ratio requires data from several sources. County health departments, state medical boards, and insurance providers often maintain records of licensed physicians. Analyzing the number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists (specialists in lung conditions like asthma) in relation to the population size is crucial. A lower ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially reduced access to specialized care, negatively impacting the "Asthma Score." Conversely, a higher ratio suggests better access and potentially improved outcomes.
Standout practices are those that demonstrate exceptional patient care, innovative service delivery, and a commitment to community health. Identifying these practices requires examining several criteria. Patient reviews, collected through platforms like Healthgrades and Zocdoc, provide valuable insights into patient satisfaction and perceived quality of care. Analyzing the availability of extended hours, same-day appointments, and online portals for appointment scheduling and communication is essential. Practices that actively participate in asthma education programs, offer comprehensive asthma management plans, and collaborate with specialists to provide coordinated care would likely score higher. Furthermore, practices that are actively involved in community outreach programs, such as free asthma screenings or educational workshops, should be considered.
Telemedicine adoption is a significant factor in modern healthcare. The ability to offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and online patient education can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Evaluating the adoption of telemedicine in Sproul involves assessing the availability of virtual appointments with PCPs and pulmonologists. The use of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters that transmit data to the physician, can improve asthma management. Practices that have integrated telemedicine into their standard of care would likely contribute to a higher "Asthma Score" by enhancing patient convenience and improving the overall quality of care.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, but they are crucial. Asthma can be a chronic condition that can lead to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. The availability of mental health services, such as counseling and therapy, is essential for comprehensive patient care. Assessing the integration of mental health services within primary care practices and pulmonology clinics is critical. Practices that offer on-site mental health professionals or have established referral networks with mental health providers would likely contribute to a higher "Asthma Score" by addressing the holistic needs of their patients.
Specific examples of practices and resources within ZIP code 16682 would require a detailed investigation. This would involve contacting local hospitals, clinics, and physician offices to gather information about their services, patient demographics, and quality metrics. Information from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and local healthcare organizations would be essential. This data would be analyzed to identify practices that excel in specific areas, such as patient education, telemedicine adoption, or mental health integration.
The "Asthma Score" for doctors in ZIP code 16682, and primary care availability in Sproul, would be a composite score based on all of the above factors. This score would provide a comprehensive assessment of the healthcare landscape in the region. The score would be influenced by physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The final "Asthma Score" would be a relative measure that could be compared to other regions or used to track improvements over time.
The analysis should also consider the socioeconomic factors that can influence asthma outcomes. Factors like poverty, housing quality, and environmental pollution can significantly impact asthma prevalence and severity. Understanding these factors is crucial for developing targeted interventions and improving the overall health of the community.
The analysis would be a dynamic process. Healthcare landscapes are constantly evolving. New technologies, treatment options, and healthcare policies are continually emerging. Regular updates to the analysis would be essential to ensure that the "Asthma Score" remains accurate and relevant.
In conclusion, a thorough analysis of asthma care and primary care availability in Sproul (ZIP code 16682) requires a comprehensive evaluation of various factors. From physician-to-patient ratios to the integration of telemedicine and mental health resources, each aspect contributes to the overall "Asthma Score." The assessment of standout practices and the consideration of socioeconomic factors are equally important. The ultimate goal is to provide a clear picture of the healthcare landscape in the region, identifying areas of strength and areas that need improvement.
For a visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Sproul and surrounding areas, including physician locations, patient demographics, and environmental factors, explore CartoChrome maps. Gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare resources available in your community.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like