The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16699, Cresson, Pennsylvania is 69 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 0.00 percent of the residents in 16699 has some form of health insurance. 0.00 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 0.00 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16699 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 0 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16699. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 0 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 383 health care providers accessible to residents in 16699, Cresson, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16699, Cresson, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 36 |
---|---|
People Score | 1 |
Provider Score | 69 |
Hospital Score | 68 |
Travel Score | 34 |
16699 | Cresson | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Cresson, PA (ZIP Code 16699)
Analyzing asthma care within Cresson, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 16699) requires a multi-faceted approach. We must evaluate the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs), assess their capacity to manage asthma, and explore the integration of resources that support comprehensive patient care. This analysis will consider physician-to-patient ratios, identify standout practices, examine telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the availability of mental health resources, all contributing to an "Asthma Score" ranking.
The foundation of effective asthma management rests on accessible and knowledgeable primary care. In Cresson, the physician-to-patient ratio is a critical starting point. A higher ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can strain resources, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and reduced time spent with each patient. This can negatively impact the ability to provide thorough asthma assessments, develop personalized treatment plans, and monitor patient progress effectively. Data from the US Census Bureau and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, along with information from local healthcare providers, would be essential to determine the precise physician-to-patient ratio in this specific ZIP code. This ratio is a fundamental component of the Asthma Score, with a lower ratio (more physicians) contributing to a higher score.
Beyond sheer numbers, the quality of primary care is paramount. Practices demonstrating a commitment to asthma management would receive higher marks. This includes practices that actively: provide comprehensive asthma education to patients and families; utilize standardized asthma action plans; regularly assess asthma control using validated questionnaires; and demonstrate a willingness to collaborate with pulmonologists or other specialists when needed. Identifying standout practices would involve reviewing patient testimonials, examining practice websites and marketing materials, and potentially conducting interviews with local healthcare professionals. These practices would be recognized for their proactive approach to asthma care, boosting the overall Asthma Score for the area.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool, particularly for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Its adoption in Cresson would be a significant factor in the Asthma Score calculation. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, medication refills, and remote monitoring of lung function, making care more accessible, especially for patients with mobility issues or those living in remote areas. Assessing telemedicine adoption involves determining which practices offer telehealth services for asthma management, the types of services offered (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring), and the level of patient satisfaction with these services. Practices actively embracing telemedicine would contribute positively to the overall Asthma Score.
Asthma often coexists with mental health challenges, such as anxiety and depression. These conditions can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively impact treatment adherence. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources is crucial for comprehensive asthma care. This includes access to mental health professionals (therapists, psychiatrists), support groups, and educational materials on managing the psychological aspects of asthma. Evaluating the availability of these resources involves researching local mental health providers, assessing their capacity to serve patients with asthma, and determining the level of integration between primary care practices and mental health services. A robust network of mental health support would significantly enhance the Asthma Score.
Furthermore, access to specialists is vital. While PCPs manage the majority of asthma cases, patients with severe or uncontrolled asthma may require the expertise of pulmonologists and allergists. The proximity of these specialists and the ease with which patients can access their services are important considerations. This involves examining the location of specialists relative to Cresson, the availability of appointment slots, and the efficiency of referral processes. A well-connected network of specialists would contribute positively to the Asthma Score, ensuring patients receive the appropriate level of care.
The Asthma Score for Cresson (ZIP Code 16699) would be a composite measure, weighting each of the factors discussed above. The physician-to-patient ratio would be a significant component, reflecting the overall accessibility of care. The quality of primary care, as evidenced by practices' asthma management protocols and patient education efforts, would also carry considerable weight. Telemedicine adoption, the availability of mental health resources, and access to specialists would further refine the score, reflecting the comprehensiveness of asthma care in the area. The final score would provide a valuable benchmark for assessing the strengths and weaknesses of asthma care in Cresson.
The analysis would also consider the demographic characteristics of the population in Cresson. Factors like age, socioeconomic status, and race/ethnicity can influence asthma prevalence and severity. Understanding these demographics is essential for tailoring asthma care to the specific needs of the community. This involves analyzing publicly available data from the US Census Bureau and other sources to identify any disparities in asthma care and to ensure that resources are allocated equitably.
The Asthma Score is not a static measure; it is a dynamic assessment that should be regularly updated to reflect changes in healthcare delivery. Continuous monitoring of physician-to-patient ratios, telemedicine adoption rates, and the availability of mental health resources is essential for maintaining a high-quality asthma care system. Regular reviews and updates to the Asthma Score can help identify areas for improvement and guide efforts to enhance asthma care in Cresson.
In conclusion, assessing asthma care in Cresson, PA (ZIP Code 16699) requires a comprehensive evaluation of various factors. Physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of primary care, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and access to specialists all play a crucial role in determining the effectiveness of asthma management. By analyzing these factors and developing an Asthma Score, we can gain a clearer understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of asthma care in Cresson and identify areas for improvement.
To visualize the distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, specialist availability, and mental health services, consider using CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide valuable insights into the accessibility of care and help identify areas where resources may be lacking.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like