The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 16828, Centre Hall, Pennsylvania is 58 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.19 percent of the residents in 16828 has some form of health insurance. 41.79 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 79.52 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 16828 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,015 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 16828. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,209 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 2,840 health care providers accessible to residents in 16828, Centre Hall, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 16828, Centre Hall, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 87 |
---|---|
People Score | 73 |
Provider Score | 58 |
Hospital Score | 68 |
Travel Score | 54 |
16828 | Centre Hall | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Centre Hall, PA (ZIP Code 16828)
Centre Hall, Pennsylvania, nestled within the broader State College area, presents a unique environment for assessing asthma care. This analysis, focused on ZIP code 16828, delves into the availability and quality of primary care, specifically examining factors pertinent to asthma management. These factors include physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, all crucial components of comprehensive asthma care.
The physician-to-patient ratio in Centre Hall and the surrounding areas is a critical starting point. While precise, up-to-the-minute data is dynamic, publicly available resources like the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services and the Pennsylvania Department of Health can provide estimates. A lower ratio, indicating more physicians per capita, generally translates to greater accessibility. However, this metric alone doesn't paint the full picture. The specialization of those physicians, their willingness to accept new patients, and their expertise in asthma management are equally important. The proximity of specialists in pulmonology and allergy, often located in nearby State College, is also a factor.
Identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive. This involves examining patient reviews, assessing the breadth of services offered, and evaluating the use of evidence-based asthma management protocols. Practices demonstrating a commitment to patient education, offering comprehensive asthma action plans, and actively monitoring patient outcomes would score higher. Furthermore, practices that integrate a multidisciplinary approach, involving nurses, respiratory therapists, and potentially behavioral health specialists, demonstrate a more holistic approach to care. These practices often prioritize patient empowerment and self-management, key elements in controlling asthma symptoms and preventing exacerbations.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly relevant, particularly in rural areas. The ability to conduct virtual consultations, especially for follow-up appointments and medication adjustments, can significantly improve access to care for patients in Centre Hall. Practices that have embraced telemedicine, offering secure video conferencing and remote monitoring capabilities, are better positioned to provide timely and convenient care. This is particularly beneficial for patients with mobility issues or those who face transportation challenges. The ease of access to telemedicine can also facilitate more frequent communication between patients and their providers, leading to better symptom control and reduced hospitalizations.
The integration of mental health resources is another critical aspect of asthma care. Asthma, as a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient's emotional well-being. Anxiety, depression, and stress can exacerbate asthma symptoms and negatively affect treatment adherence. Practices that recognize this connection and offer or facilitate access to mental health services, such as counseling or therapy, demonstrate a more patient-centered approach. This could involve on-site mental health professionals, referrals to local therapists, or the use of telehealth platforms to connect patients with mental health providers. Addressing the psychological aspects of asthma is crucial for improving overall patient outcomes and quality of life.
Analyzing these factors requires a multi-faceted approach. Data from insurance providers, patient surveys, and public health agencies can be combined to create a comprehensive picture of asthma care in Centre Hall. This data can be used to develop an “Asthma Score,” reflecting the accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of care available to residents of ZIP code 16828. The score would incorporate metrics related to physician-to-patient ratios, the availability of specialized asthma care, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health services.
The specific ranking would be determined by weighting these factors based on their relative importance. For example, the availability of specialized asthma care might be weighted more heavily than the adoption of telemedicine, depending on the prevalence of severe asthma cases in the area. The score could be presented on a scale, allowing for easy comparison between different practices and providers. This would empower patients to make informed decisions about their care and encourage providers to improve their services.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the specific needs of the Centre Hall population. This includes factors such as the age distribution of the population, the prevalence of asthma triggers in the local environment (e.g., pollen, air quality), and the socioeconomic status of residents. Understanding these factors can help tailor asthma management strategies to the specific needs of the community.
The assessment should also consider the role of community resources, such as support groups, educational programs, and access to affordable medications. These resources can play a vital role in empowering patients to manage their asthma effectively. Collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and public health agencies is essential for creating a comprehensive and supportive environment for asthma patients.
The final “Asthma Score” analysis would provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of asthma care in Centre Hall. It would highlight areas where improvements are needed and identify best practices that can be replicated. This information can be used to inform policy decisions, guide resource allocation, and ultimately improve the health and well-being of asthma patients in the community.
The creation of a dynamic, interactive map showcasing these factors, including physician locations, practice ratings, and telemedicine capabilities, would be invaluable. This map would provide a user-friendly interface for patients to find the best possible care in their area.
***
Ready to visualize the asthma care landscape in Centre Hall and beyond? Explore the power of spatial data and discover how to map healthcare resources with precision. Visit CartoChrome maps today and transform data into actionable insights.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like