The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 17016, Cornwall, Pennsylvania is 85 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 89.68 percent of the residents in 17016 has some form of health insurance. 44.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 80.33 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17016 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 147 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 42 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17016. An estimate of 14 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 393 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 11,708 health care providers accessible to residents in 17016, Cornwall, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17016, Cornwall, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 98 |
---|---|
People Score | 94 |
Provider Score | 85 |
Hospital Score | 68 |
Travel Score | 51 |
17016 | Cornwall | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing asthma care within ZIP code 17016, encompassing Cornwall, Pennsylvania, requires a multi-faceted approach. We'll evaluate physician accessibility, practice characteristics, and resource availability, culminating in a comprehensive "Asthma Score" assessment. This score, though not a formal metric, will represent a qualitative understanding of the landscape, considering factors beyond simple numbers.
The foundation of asthma care rests on accessible primary care. In Cornwall, understanding primary care availability is crucial. We need to determine the physician-to-patient ratio. Publicly available data, such as that from the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the US Census Bureau, can offer population estimates. Then, identifying the number of practicing primary care physicians (PCPs) within the ZIP code is essential. This can be achieved through online physician directories, insurance provider listings, and local hospital websites. A low ratio, indicating fewer PCPs per capita, could negatively impact the Asthma Score, signaling potential difficulty in securing timely appointments for asthma management.
Beyond raw numbers, we must assess the characteristics of the practices. Are they accepting new patients? Do they offer extended hours or weekend appointments, critical for managing asthma exacerbations? Do they have dedicated asthma educators or respiratory therapists on staff? Practices with these resources would positively influence the Asthma Score, demonstrating a commitment to comprehensive asthma care. The availability of specialized equipment, such as spirometry, for lung function testing, is also a key consideration.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical element. The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telehealth, and its continued use is beneficial for asthma patients. Telemedicine allows for virtual consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring of symptoms. Practices that embrace telemedicine, offering virtual appointments and remote patient monitoring tools, would receive a higher score. This is especially relevant for patients with mobility issues or those living in more remote areas within the ZIP code.
Mental health resources are often overlooked but are integral to asthma management. Asthma can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and stress. The Asthma Score must consider the availability of mental health services within the community. Does the primary care practice have integrated mental health services? Are there readily accessible therapists or counselors specializing in chronic illness management? The presence of these resources would positively influence the score, reflecting a holistic approach to patient care.
Standout practices within 17016 deserve specific recognition. We can identify them by analyzing online patient reviews, surveying community members, and examining practice websites. A practice demonstrating exceptional patient communication, proactive asthma management protocols, and a commitment to patient education would be considered a standout. These practices would serve as models for others, potentially influencing the overall Asthma Score positively. For example, a practice actively involved in community outreach programs, providing asthma education workshops, would be highly regarded.
The analysis also needs to consider the availability of specialized asthma care. While primary care is the cornerstone, access to pulmonologists and allergists is vital for patients with severe or complex asthma. The proximity of specialists, the ease of referral processes, and the wait times for appointments all impact the Asthma Score. The presence of a local hospital with a dedicated respiratory therapy department would also be a significant positive factor.
Medication accessibility is another critical consideration. Does the community have readily accessible pharmacies? Are there programs to assist patients with the cost of asthma medications, such as patient assistance programs or local pharmacy discount cards? The ease of obtaining necessary medications directly impacts asthma control and, therefore, the Asthma Score.
Furthermore, the analysis should consider the demographics of the population within 17016. Are there specific populations at higher risk for asthma, such as children or individuals with lower socioeconomic status? The Asthma Score should reflect the ability of the healthcare system to address the needs of these vulnerable populations. This includes considering language accessibility, cultural sensitivity, and the availability of resources tailored to specific needs.
The overall Asthma Score is not a single numerical value but a composite assessment. It reflects the strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare ecosystem in managing asthma within Cornwall. A high score would indicate a well-resourced system with accessible primary care, telemedicine capabilities, integrated mental health services, and readily available medications. A lower score would highlight areas needing improvement, such as physician shortages, limited access to specialists, or a lack of mental health support.
This comprehensive analysis, however, is only the starting point. The dynamic nature of healthcare necessitates continuous monitoring and evaluation. Regularly updating the Asthma Score, based on new data and evolving healthcare practices, is crucial. This ongoing assessment allows for identifying areas for improvement and ensuring that patients in Cornwall receive the best possible asthma care.
To visualize this data, to understand the geographic distribution of resources, and to identify potential gaps in care, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can overlay data on a geographic map, allowing you to pinpoint the locations of primary care practices, pharmacies, and other essential resources. This visual representation can reveal patterns and trends that might be missed in a purely numerical analysis.
Use CartoChrome maps to visualize the Asthma Score analysis for 17016, allowing for a deeper understanding of the asthma care landscape in Cornwall.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like