17239, Neelyton, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 17239, Neelyton, Pennsylvania is 52 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 79.55 percent of the residents in 17239 has some form of health insurance. 31.25 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.48 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17239 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 57 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 10 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17239. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 36 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 8,348 health care providers accessible to residents in 17239, Neelyton, Pennsylvania.

**Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 17239 and Primary Care Availability in Neelyton**

Analyzing healthcare access and quality, particularly concerning asthma management, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis focuses on ZIP code 17239, encompassing the town of Mercersburg, Pennsylvania, and the specific consideration of primary care availability in the nearby community of Neelyton. We will evaluate the landscape of healthcare providers, focusing on physician-to-patient ratios, notable practices, telemedicine integration, and the availability of mental health resources, all contributing to an “Asthma Score” reflecting the ease and quality of asthma care.

The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator of healthcare access. A low ratio, meaning a higher number of patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced time per patient during consultations, and potentially, diminished quality of care. In 17239, the ratio needs careful examination. Publicly available data from the Health Resources & Services Administration (HRSA) and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, along with local surveys, will be used to calculate the specific ratio. A higher ratio suggests a less favorable asthma score, as it indicates potential challenges in accessing timely and consistent care. The proximity of Neelyton, with its own population and healthcare needs, further complicates the picture. Residents of Neelyton often rely on Mercersburg’s healthcare facilities, which can strain resources and exacerbate the physician-to-patient ratio.

Identifying standout practices within 17239 is essential. These practices often serve as models for best practices in asthma management. Factors to consider include the use of evidence-based treatment guidelines, patient education programs, and the availability of specialized services, such as pulmonary function testing. Practices that prioritize patient-centered care, including proactive communication and readily accessible patient portals, generally contribute positively to the asthma score. We will assess the use of electronic health records (EHRs) and their interoperability, as seamless information exchange is vital for coordinated care, especially for chronic conditions like asthma. Interviews with local healthcare professionals and patient feedback will be incorporated to identify these exemplary practices and their impact on asthma care.

Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring, has the potential to improve access to care, particularly for individuals in rural areas like Neelyton. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can offer more frequent check-ins, medication management, and asthma education, all of which can improve asthma control and reduce exacerbations. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters with data transmission capabilities, further enhances the effectiveness of telemedicine. The asthma score will reflect the extent to which practices in 17239 have integrated telemedicine into their care models, considering factors such as the types of services offered, patient satisfaction, and the impact on clinical outcomes.

Mental health resources are frequently overlooked in asthma management, but they are a vital component of comprehensive care. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through in-house providers or referrals to external specialists, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. The asthma score will assess the availability of mental health resources within the 17239 area, including the presence of mental health professionals, access to counseling and therapy, and the integration of mental health screenings into routine asthma care. The proximity of Neelyton, and the potential for limited resources in that community, will be considered in this evaluation.

The “Asthma Score” itself will be a composite measure, integrating all these factors. It will be a numerical representation, potentially on a scale of 1 to 100, where a higher score indicates better asthma care access and quality. The score will be calculated based on weighted criteria: physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. The weighting of each factor will reflect its relative importance in contributing to positive asthma outcomes. The score will be dynamic, reflecting changes in the healthcare landscape over time.

The specific details of the analysis will involve gathering data from multiple sources. This includes publicly available data from government agencies, surveys of local healthcare providers, and patient feedback. The data will be analyzed to identify trends, patterns, and areas for improvement. The analysis will consider the unique characteristics of the 17239 area, including its rural setting and the proximity of Neelyton. The goal is to provide a comprehensive assessment of asthma care access and quality in the region.

The analysis will also consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on asthma outcomes. Factors such as income, education, and access to transportation can significantly affect a patient's ability to manage their asthma. The analysis will consider these factors and how they may impact the asthma score. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the challenges and opportunities in asthma care within the 17239 area.

The final Asthma Score will be a valuable tool for healthcare providers, patients, and policymakers. It will provide a benchmark for assessing the quality of asthma care and identifying areas for improvement. It will also provide a basis for developing targeted interventions to improve asthma outcomes. The analysis will be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.

For a dynamic and visual representation of the healthcare landscape in 17239, including the locations of healthcare providers, population density, and other relevant data, explore the power of CartoChrome maps.