17263, State Line, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 17263, State Line, Pennsylvania is 55 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 100.00 percent of the residents in 17263 has some form of health insurance. 25.94 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 88.29 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17263 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 225 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17263. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 112 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 5,642 health care providers accessible to residents in 17263, State Line, Pennsylvania.

**Asthma Score Analysis: Physicians and Primary Care in State Line, PA (ZIP Code 17263)**

Analyzing the availability and quality of asthma care within ZIP Code 17263 (State Line, Pennsylvania) requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis considers factors impacting asthma management, including physician-to-patient ratios, the presence of standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the integration of mental health resources, all crucial for comprehensive patient care. The goal is to provide a nuanced understanding of the current healthcare landscape and identify areas for potential improvement.

Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical indicator of access to care. In areas with a high concentration of residents, a shortage of primary care physicians and specialists, particularly pulmonologists and allergists, can lead to delayed diagnoses, inadequate treatment, and increased hospitalizations for asthma exacerbations. The ideal ratio varies, but a lower ratio (fewer patients per physician) generally indicates better access. Data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and relevant professional organizations are necessary to determine the precise physician-to-patient ratios within 17263. This data must be regularly updated to reflect changes in the population and physician workforce. A low ratio does not automatically equate to quality, but it does provide a foundation for better care.

Identifying standout practices involves assessing several factors. These include the use of evidence-based asthma management guidelines, patient satisfaction scores, and the availability of specialized services. Practices that actively engage in patient education, provide personalized asthma action plans, and offer comprehensive care coordination often achieve better outcomes. The utilization of electronic health records (EHRs) allows for improved data tracking, medication management, and communication between providers. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives, such as those promoted by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP), are likely to provide higher-quality care. Reviews from patients, when available, can also provide valuable insights.

Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool for asthma management, particularly in rural areas like State Line. Telemedicine allows for remote consultations, medication management, and patient education, reducing the need for in-person visits. Practices that embrace telemedicine can extend their reach, improve patient convenience, and potentially reduce healthcare costs. The adoption of telehealth technologies, such as remote monitoring devices and virtual asthma education programs, can empower patients to actively manage their condition. The availability of reliable internet access and digital literacy among patients are crucial factors for successful telemedicine implementation.

The integration of mental health resources is increasingly recognized as essential for effective asthma care. Asthma can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that provide access to mental health professionals, either in-house or through referrals, can address the psychological aspects of asthma and improve patient outcomes. This integration can involve screening for mental health conditions, providing counseling services, and coordinating care between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and mental health specialists. The availability of mental health resources, such as therapists and support groups, is particularly important for patients with poorly controlled asthma.

Evaluating the availability of primary care within State Line requires an examination of the number of primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants serving the area. The proximity of these providers to residents is a key factor. Areas with limited access to primary care often experience higher rates of emergency room visits and hospitalizations for asthma. The ability to schedule timely appointments, the acceptance of various insurance plans, and the availability of after-hours care are also important considerations. Community health centers and federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) often play a crucial role in providing primary care to underserved populations.

A comprehensive analysis of asthma care in 17263 would consider the following: the number of board-certified pulmonologists and allergists in the area; the availability of asthma education programs; the use of spirometry and other diagnostic tools; the percentage of patients with asthma who have an asthma action plan; the rate of asthma-related hospitalizations and emergency room visits; and patient adherence to medication regimens. Data from local hospitals, health systems, and public health agencies can provide valuable insights into these factors.

The analysis should also consider the demographic characteristics of the population, including age, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. Asthma disproportionately affects certain populations, and understanding these disparities is essential for developing targeted interventions. For example, areas with a high prevalence of asthma in children may require specific programs to address environmental triggers in schools and homes.

The quality of asthma care is not solely determined by the availability of physicians and resources. Patient engagement, adherence to treatment plans, and access to social support networks are also crucial factors. Practices that actively involve patients in their care, provide culturally competent services, and address social determinants of health are more likely to achieve positive outcomes.

Data collection and analysis should be ongoing. Regular monitoring of key indicators, such as physician-to-patient ratios, hospitalization rates, and patient satisfaction scores, can help identify trends and inform quality improvement efforts. Feedback from patients and healthcare providers is also essential for identifying areas for improvement.

The assessment should also consider the impact of environmental factors on asthma prevalence and severity. Air quality, exposure to allergens, and the presence of indoor triggers, such as mold and dust mites, can significantly impact asthma control. Public health initiatives aimed at improving air quality, educating residents about environmental triggers, and providing resources for asthma management can play a crucial role in reducing the burden of asthma in the community.

The analysis should also consider the role of community partnerships in improving asthma care. Collaborations between healthcare providers, schools, community organizations, and public health agencies can create a more comprehensive and coordinated approach to asthma management. These partnerships can facilitate patient education, provide access to resources, and address social determinants of health.

The information obtained from this analysis can be used to develop targeted interventions to improve asthma care in 17263. These interventions may include increasing the number of primary care physicians and specialists, expanding the use of telemedicine, integrating mental health resources, providing asthma education programs, and addressing environmental triggers. The ultimate goal is to improve the quality of life for individuals with asthma and reduce the burden of this chronic disease on the community.

For a more detailed and visually informative understanding of physician locations, primary care availability, and related demographic data within the 17263 ZIP code, explore the interactive maps and data visualizations offered by CartoChrome. Their platform can provide a powerful visual representation of the healthcare landscape in State Line, PA, allowing for a deeper understanding of the challenges and opportunities in asthma care.