The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 17311, Codorus, Pennsylvania is 77 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 90.48 percent of the residents in 17311 has some form of health insurance. 45.24 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 69.64 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17311 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 6 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 5 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17311. An estimate of 2 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 54 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 3,982 health care providers accessible to residents in 17311, Codorus, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17311, Codorus, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 88 |
---|---|
People Score | 72 |
Provider Score | 77 |
Hospital Score | 65 |
Travel Score | 42 |
17311 | Codorus | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of asthma care and primary care accessibility in the 17311 ZIP code, specifically within the context of Codorus, Pennsylvania, necessitates a multifaceted approach. It involves evaluating the availability of primary care physicians, assessing the quality of asthma management, and considering the integration of innovative healthcare solutions. We will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, examine notable medical practices, explore telemedicine utilization, and consider the availability of mental health resources.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a critical indicator of healthcare accessibility. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnoses. Determining the precise physician-to-patient ratio within 17311 requires accessing publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health or the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA). This data, ideally broken down by specialty (primary care, pulmonology, etc.), provides a foundation for understanding the capacity of the local healthcare system to meet the needs of its residents, particularly those with chronic conditions like asthma.
Within Codorus, the availability of primary care physicians is paramount. These physicians often serve as the first point of contact for individuals with asthma, providing initial diagnoses, developing treatment plans, and coordinating care with specialists. Assessing the geographical distribution of these practices within Codorus is crucial. Are primary care physicians centrally located, easily accessible to all residents, or are there pockets of underserved populations? This geographical analysis can reveal potential disparities in access to care.
Identifying standout practices within the 17311 ZIP code is essential. These practices often demonstrate best practices in asthma management, potentially including comprehensive patient education, adherence to national guidelines, and proactive monitoring of patients’ conditions. Researching the practices' patient satisfaction scores, their use of electronic health records (EHRs) to track asthma control, and their participation in quality improvement initiatives can help identify those that excel in providing asthma care. Furthermore, investigating the availability of specialized asthma clinics or pulmonologists within the area is important.
Telemedicine has emerged as a valuable tool for managing chronic conditions like asthma, especially in rural areas where access to in-person care may be limited. The adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices and specialists in 17311 is a crucial factor. Telemedicine can facilitate virtual consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring of patients' respiratory function. Assessing the level of telemedicine adoption involves examining the availability of virtual appointments, the use of remote monitoring devices, and the integration of telemedicine into existing asthma management protocols.
The link between asthma and mental health is increasingly recognized. Anxiety and depression can exacerbate asthma symptoms, and conversely, the chronic nature of asthma can contribute to mental health challenges. Therefore, the availability of mental health resources within the 17311 ZIP code is a significant consideration. This includes access to mental health professionals, such as therapists and psychiatrists, as well as the integration of mental health services into primary care practices. Assessing the availability of these resources involves examining the number of mental health providers in the area, the types of services offered, and the level of collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health specialists.
Evaluating the asthma score requires a holistic view. It is not simply about the number of physicians or the availability of telemedicine. It is about the quality of care provided, the accessibility of that care, and the integration of innovative solutions to improve patient outcomes. This analysis should consider the following factors: physician-to-patient ratios; the geographical distribution of primary care practices; the quality of care provided by standout practices; the adoption of telemedicine; and the availability of mental health resources.
To further refine the analysis, it is important to examine specific data points. For example, the percentage of patients with asthma who have a documented asthma action plan, the rate of emergency room visits for asthma exacerbations, and the use of evidence-based medications. These data points can provide a more granular understanding of the effectiveness of asthma management within the 17311 ZIP code.
The availability of support groups and educational programs for asthma patients and their families is also a crucial factor. These resources can empower patients to take control of their condition, improve their adherence to treatment plans, and reduce the impact of asthma on their daily lives. Researching the availability of these resources within Codorus and the surrounding areas is essential.
Furthermore, the role of community health initiatives and public health programs in addressing asthma is important. These programs can provide education, outreach, and resources to high-risk populations, such as children and individuals with low incomes. Assessing the presence and effectiveness of these initiatives is crucial.
The evaluation of primary care availability in Codorus is intertwined with the assessment of asthma care. Primary care physicians are often the gatekeepers to specialized care and play a vital role in coordinating the care of patients with asthma. Therefore, a comprehensive analysis of primary care availability should include factors such as appointment wait times, the acceptance of different insurance plans, and the availability of after-hours care.
In conclusion, assessing the asthma score for doctors in ZIP code 17311, particularly within the context of Codorus, requires a detailed examination of various factors. These factors encompass physician-to-patient ratios, the quality of care provided by standout practices, the adoption of telemedicine, and the availability of mental health resources. This multifaceted approach provides a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape and identifies areas for improvement.
To gain a visual understanding of the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, patient demographics, and areas with high asthma prevalence, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps can provide valuable insights into the accessibility of care and the potential for targeted interventions.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like