The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 17314, Delta, Pennsylvania is 68 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 84.62 percent of the residents in 17314 has some form of health insurance. 33.98 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 63.42 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17314 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,591 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17314. An estimate of 1 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,048 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 514 health care providers accessible to residents in 17314, Delta, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17314, Delta, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 40 |
---|---|
People Score | 24 |
Provider Score | 68 |
Hospital Score | 50 |
Travel Score | 37 |
17314 | Delta | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma management within ZIP Code 17314, encompassing the borough of Delta, Pennsylvania, demands a multifaceted analysis. This assessment considers physician availability, the adoption of modern healthcare practices, and the integration of mental health support, all crucial for effectively managing asthma and improving patient outcomes. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current healthcare landscape and identify areas for improvement.
Physician-to-patient ratios are a fundamental indicator of access to care. In Delta, the availability of primary care physicians, particularly those specializing in internal medicine or family practice, is critical. A low ratio, indicating fewer doctors relative to the population, can lead to longer wait times for appointments, reduced opportunities for preventative care, and potentially delayed diagnoses. Publicly available data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health, the US Census Bureau, and the American Medical Association (AMA) can be utilized to ascertain the physician-to-patient ratio within the specified ZIP code. The analysis must account for the number of actively practicing physicians, considering factors like retirement, relocation, and specialization.
Beyond sheer numbers, the geographical distribution of physicians matters. Are primary care practices clustered in one area, leaving other parts of Delta underserved? This spatial analysis is vital to identify potential healthcare deserts, areas with limited access to medical services. Examining the location of practices, transportation infrastructure, and the demographic makeup of different neighborhoods allows for a nuanced understanding of accessibility challenges.
Standout practices in Delta, those demonstrating exceptional asthma management, should be identified. This requires evaluating various factors, including the availability of specialized asthma care, the implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines, and patient satisfaction levels. Practices that actively engage in patient education, provide comprehensive asthma action plans, and offer convenient appointment scheduling, including after-hours availability, deserve recognition. Data on patient outcomes, such as the frequency of asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations, can be used to assess the effectiveness of different practices.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical aspect of modern asthma care. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and digital education, can significantly improve access to care, especially for patients in rural areas or those with mobility limitations. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can offer more frequent check-ins, provide personalized asthma management plans, and facilitate early intervention in response to worsening symptoms. The analysis should assess the types of telemedicine services offered, the technology used, and the patient experience with these services.
The integration of mental health resources into asthma care is increasingly recognized as essential. Asthma, as a chronic condition, can significantly impact mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that provide access to mental health professionals, either through on-site services or referrals, are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients. The analysis should examine the availability of mental health services, the integration of mental health screenings into routine asthma care, and the collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health providers.
Evaluating the availability of asthma education resources is also important. Practices that offer patient education programs, self-management training, and access to educational materials can empower patients to take an active role in their care. The analysis should assess the availability of educational resources, the topics covered, and the methods used to deliver information to patients.
Furthermore, it is important to consider the role of community resources in asthma management. This includes access to pharmacies, respiratory therapists, and support groups. The analysis should assess the availability of these resources and their accessibility to patients in Delta.
The analysis will also consider the impact of insurance coverage on access to care. The availability of affordable health insurance is essential for ensuring that patients can access the medical services they need. The analysis should consider the types of insurance coverage available in Delta and the impact of insurance coverage on access to care.
Finally, the analysis should consider the impact of socioeconomic factors on asthma management. Factors such as poverty, housing quality, and environmental exposures can all impact asthma outcomes. The analysis should consider the impact of these factors on asthma management in Delta.
In conclusion, assessing the asthma management landscape in ZIP Code 17314 requires a comprehensive approach. It involves evaluating physician availability, the adoption of modern healthcare practices, the integration of mental health resources, and the role of community resources. By analyzing these factors, it is possible to identify areas of strength and areas for improvement, ultimately leading to better asthma outcomes for the residents of Delta.
For a dynamic, visual representation of the healthcare landscape in Delta, Pennsylvania, and to explore the spatial distribution of physicians, healthcare resources, and demographic data, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. These interactive maps provide an invaluable tool for understanding the complexities of healthcare access and identifying areas where resources can be better allocated. Explore the power of visual data – visit CartoChrome maps today.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like