17517, Denver, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 17517, Denver, Pennsylvania is 81 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 86.31 percent of the residents in 17517 has some form of health insurance. 28.30 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 70.34 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17517 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 3,958 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 2 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17517. An estimate of 4 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,151 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 4,946 health care providers accessible to residents in 17517, Denver, Pennsylvania.

## Asthma Score Analysis: 17517 & Denver Primary Care

This analysis provides an "Asthma Score" evaluation, focusing on primary care access and resources for asthma management within ZIP code 17517 (Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania) and the broader Denver, Colorado metropolitan area. The "Asthma Score" is a conceptual framework, assessing factors contributing to effective asthma care, including physician availability, resource accessibility, and integration of innovative care models.

**17517: Elizabethtown, PA – A Localized Perspective**

Elizabethtown, Pennsylvania, presents a unique set of challenges and opportunities in asthma care. The area's rural or semi-rural character influences access to specialized care and the availability of support services.

Physician-to-patient ratios in 17517 likely reflect a moderate level of primary care access. Compared to densely populated urban areas, the ratio might be less favorable, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments. This can be particularly problematic for asthma patients who require timely intervention during exacerbations. The presence of a local hospital, such as the one in nearby Lancaster, is a significant asset. It can provide emergency care and access to specialists, but the distance and travel time can still be a barrier.

Standout practices in 17517, if any, would likely be those demonstrating proactive asthma management. This includes practices that offer comprehensive asthma education, personalized action plans, and regular monitoring of patients' symptoms. Practices that readily embrace digital health tools for patient communication and medication adherence support would also score higher. The effectiveness of these practices is crucial in a region where access to specialized pulmonology services might be limited.

Telemedicine adoption in 17517 is a critical factor. Telemedicine can bridge geographical gaps, allowing patients to connect with their physicians remotely for follow-up appointments, medication adjustments, and symptom monitoring. Its successful implementation requires robust internet infrastructure and patient comfort with technology. Practices that have integrated telemedicine into their asthma care protocols would demonstrate a higher "Asthma Score."

Mental health resources are an essential, often overlooked, component of asthma management. Chronic respiratory conditions can contribute to anxiety and depression. The availability of mental health professionals within the primary care setting or through readily accessible referrals is vital. Practices that acknowledge the interplay between asthma and mental health and offer integrated care would receive a higher score.

**Denver, CO: A Metropolitan Landscape**

Denver, a major metropolitan area, presents a different set of challenges and opportunities. Its larger population and diverse demographics influence the dynamics of asthma care.

Physician-to-patient ratios in Denver are generally better than in rural areas, but disparities can exist based on location and socioeconomic status. Access to primary care physicians, pulmonologists, and allergists is typically more accessible, but wait times can still be an issue. The concentration of medical facilities and specialists in the city core provides a significant advantage.

Standout practices in Denver are likely to be those that employ a multidisciplinary approach to asthma care. This includes collaboration between primary care physicians, pulmonologists, allergists, respiratory therapists, and mental health professionals. Practices that utilize evidence-based guidelines and incorporate the latest advances in asthma management, such as biologic therapies, would also score highly.

Telemedicine adoption in Denver is expected to be more widespread than in 17517. The city's technologically advanced infrastructure and the presence of large healthcare systems facilitate the implementation of telehealth services. Practices that offer virtual consultations, remote monitoring, and digital patient education programs would be viewed favorably.

Mental health resources in Denver are generally more accessible than in rural areas. The city has a diverse range of mental health providers and support services. Practices that integrate mental health screening and treatment into their asthma care protocols would demonstrate a strong commitment to holistic patient care. The availability of culturally competent mental health services is also crucial, considering Denver's diverse population.

**Comparative Analysis and Score Considerations**

Comparing the two locations, Denver likely receives a higher overall "Asthma Score" due to its greater access to specialized care, advanced technology, and a wider range of resources. However, 17517's score could be improved through strategic initiatives such as telemedicine implementation, the development of integrated care models, and greater focus on mental health integration.

The "Asthma Score" in both locations is influenced by factors beyond physician availability. These include patient education, access to affordable medications, air quality, and socioeconomic factors. Both areas should focus on proactive asthma management, patient empowerment, and the use of technology to improve patient outcomes.

**Conclusion**

This analysis offers a snapshot of the asthma care landscape in 17517 and Denver. Both locations face unique challenges and opportunities. Improving asthma care requires a multifaceted approach, addressing physician access, resource availability, and the integration of innovative care models.

To visualize the geographic distribution of asthma resources, physician availability, and other relevant data points, we recommend exploring the power of **CartoChrome maps**. CartoChrome can provide a visual representation of the data, allowing for a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in asthma care.