Asthma Score

17536, Kirkwood, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

Average Rating: 0.0 / 5 stars

0 Reviews

Health Scores

Provider Score in 17536, Kirkwood, Pennsylvania

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 17536, Kirkwood, Pennsylvania is 65 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 55.93 percent of the residents in 17536 has some form of health insurance. 19.71 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 44.72 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17536 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 1,246 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17536. An estimate of 13 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 642 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,823 health care providers accessible to residents in 17536, Kirkwood, Pennsylvania.

Health Scores in 17536, Kirkwood, Pennsylvania

Asthma Score 42
People Score 28
Provider Score 65
Hospital Score 64
Travel Score 24

Provider Type in a 20-Mile Radius

17536 Kirkwood Pennsylvania
Providers per 10,000 residents 0.00 0.00 0.00
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 0.00 0.00 0.00
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 0.00 0.00 0.00

Provider Score Review of 17536, Kirkwood, Pennsylvania

Analyzing healthcare access and quality, particularly concerning asthma management, within a specific geographic area requires a multifaceted approach. Focusing on ZIP Code 17536 (which corresponds to Kirkwood, Pennsylvania) allows for a localized assessment of resources and challenges. This analysis will evaluate “doctors in ZIP Code 17536” and “primary care availability in Kirkwood,” considering factors relevant to asthma care, including physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources.

Assessing the physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial first step. This metric provides a foundational understanding of the potential burden on existing healthcare providers. Data from the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) or similar sources would be necessary to determine the precise ratio for primary care physicians and pulmonologists within the specified ZIP code. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of physicians relative to the population, can translate into longer wait times for appointments, reduced access to specialized care, and potentially poorer asthma management outcomes. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests a more readily available healthcare infrastructure. However, this ratio alone doesn't paint the complete picture. The age distribution of the population, the prevalence of asthma within the community, and the specific needs of the patient population all influence the true accessibility of care.

Identifying "standout practices" requires a deeper dive into the quality of care provided by local medical facilities. This involves reviewing patient satisfaction surveys, analyzing asthma-related hospital readmission rates, and evaluating the implementation of evidence-based asthma management guidelines. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to patient education, proactive asthma action plans, and regular follow-up appointments are likely to excel in asthma care. Furthermore, practices that offer specialized services, such as pulmonary function testing (PFT) on-site or access to certified asthma educators, can significantly enhance the quality of care. Publicly available data from organizations like the National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) or the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) could provide valuable insights into the performance of local practices.

Telemedicine adoption is increasingly relevant, particularly in rural or underserved areas. Telemedicine offers several advantages for asthma management, including remote monitoring of symptoms, virtual consultations with physicians, and access to educational resources. Examining the extent to which local practices have embraced telemedicine platforms, such as video conferencing or remote patient monitoring devices, is essential. Practices that offer telehealth options can improve access to care, reduce the need for in-person visits, and potentially improve patient adherence to treatment plans. The availability of reliable internet access within the community is also a critical factor influencing the effectiveness of telemedicine initiatives.

The integration of mental health resources into asthma care is often overlooked, yet it is a vital component of holistic patient management. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that recognize this connection and offer or facilitate access to mental health services are better equipped to support their patients. This might involve collaborating with mental health professionals, providing on-site counseling services, or offering referrals to local mental health providers. Assessing the availability of these resources is crucial for understanding the comprehensive support available to asthma patients in Kirkwood.

Evaluating primary care availability requires looking beyond the raw physician-to-patient ratio. It's important to consider the types of primary care providers available, including physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. The location and accessibility of primary care clinics, including their hours of operation and acceptance of various insurance plans, also impact availability. Furthermore, the presence of after-hours care options, such as urgent care clinics or on-call physicians, can significantly improve access to care during times of need.

To conduct a thorough analysis, it's necessary to gather data from multiple sources. This includes publicly available datasets from government agencies, insurance providers, and healthcare organizations. Patient surveys, interviews with local healthcare providers, and direct observation of healthcare facilities can provide valuable qualitative data. The use of geographic information systems (GIS) can be helpful in visualizing the distribution of healthcare resources and identifying areas with limited access to care.

The specific challenges and opportunities within Kirkwood are likely to be unique. For example, if the community has a significant elderly population, there may be a greater need for specialized asthma care and geriatric services. If the community is experiencing economic hardship, the availability of affordable medications and access to social support services may be critical. Understanding the specific demographics and socioeconomic factors of the community is essential for tailoring healthcare interventions to meet the needs of the population.

Ultimately, a comprehensive asthma score for Kirkwood would consider all these factors. It would assess the physician-to-patient ratio, the quality of care provided by local practices, the adoption of telemedicine, the integration of mental health resources, and the overall availability of primary care services. The score could be based on a weighted scoring system, with each factor contributing to the overall assessment. This score could then be used to identify areas for improvement and to guide the development of targeted interventions to enhance asthma management in the community.

The analysis would also need to consider the impact of social determinants of health, such as housing quality, environmental factors, and access to healthy food. These factors can significantly influence asthma outcomes, and addressing them is essential for improving the overall health of the community. For example, if there are high levels of air pollution in the area, this could exacerbate asthma symptoms and increase the need for healthcare services.

In conclusion, a thorough assessment of asthma care in Kirkwood requires a multi-faceted approach. It involves analyzing quantitative data, such as physician-to-patient ratios and hospital readmission rates, as well as qualitative data, such as patient satisfaction surveys and interviews with healthcare providers. By considering all these factors, it is possible to develop a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system and to identify opportunities for improvement.

To visualize and analyze the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, environmental factors, and socioeconomic data within Kirkwood, consider exploring the power of CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps can provide a visual representation of the data, allowing for a more intuitive understanding of the challenges and opportunities facing the community.

Reviews

Recent Reviews

No reviews yet.

Leave a review
Health Scores Near 17536, Kirkwood, Pennsylvania

You may also like

17566, Quarryville, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 17536: 5.72 Miles

Total Population:

17509, Christiana, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 17536: 7.08 Miles

Total Population:

17563, Peach Bottom, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 17536: 7.41 Miles

Total Population:

17560, New Providence, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 17536: 9.67 Miles

Total Population:

17518, Drumore, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 17536: 9.84 Miles

Total Population:

17562, Paradise, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 17536: 10.17 Miles

Total Population:

17579, Strasburg, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 17536: 11.45 Miles

Total Population:

17535, Kinzers, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 17536: 11.56 Miles

Total Population:

17527, Gap, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score
Asthma Score

Distance from 17536: 11.82 Miles

Total Population:

Health Scores in 17536, Kirkwood, Pennsylvania