17569, Reinholds, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 17569, Reinholds, Pennsylvania is 80 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 85.06 percent of the residents in 17569 has some form of health insurance. 28.70 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 67.36 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17569 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 2,350 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 17 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17569. An estimate of 245 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,154 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 21,019 health care providers accessible to residents in 17569, Reinholds, Pennsylvania.

The task is to analyze asthma care within ZIP code 17569, focusing on primary care availability in Reinholds, Pennsylvania. This analysis will delve into physician-to-patient ratios, identify notable practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and explore mental health resources, culminating in a call to action for CartoChrome maps. The goal is to provide a comprehensive overview of the healthcare landscape for asthma sufferers in this specific geographic area.

Reinholds, Pennsylvania, nestled within ZIP code 17569, presents a unique healthcare environment. Assessing asthma care necessitates a multi-faceted approach, beginning with the fundamental issue of access to primary care physicians (PCPs). The availability of PCPs directly impacts the ability of asthma patients to receive timely diagnoses, ongoing management, and preventative care. Physician-to-patient ratios are a critical metric. A high ratio, meaning a greater number of patients per physician, can lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially compromise the quality of care. Data on this ratio for 17569, and specifically Reinholds, is essential for understanding the overall healthcare burden.

Beyond the raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs matters. Are they concentrated in specific areas within the ZIP code, creating potential disparities in access for residents in more rural locations? The presence of specialized asthma clinics or pulmonologists within the area would significantly improve the asthma score. These specialists possess advanced knowledge and resources for managing complex cases, offering a higher level of care. The absence of such specialists would negatively impact the overall score.

Identifying standout practices is crucial. This involves looking beyond the basic metrics and evaluating the quality of care provided. Practices demonstrating a commitment to asthma management might implement standardized asthma action plans, educate patients on proper inhaler technique, and proactively monitor patients' asthma control. Patient satisfaction surveys, if available, would provide valuable insights into the patient experience. Practices that actively participate in quality improvement initiatives and demonstrate positive outcomes for their asthma patients would be considered high-performing.

Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly important, particularly in the realm of chronic disease management. For asthma patients, telemedicine offers the potential for remote monitoring, virtual check-ups, and medication adjustments. Practices that embrace telemedicine can improve patient access to care, reduce the need for in-person visits, and enhance patient convenience. The availability of telehealth services, including virtual asthma education sessions, would significantly contribute to a higher asthma score. The ease of access to these services is also a key factor.

The link between asthma and mental health is well-established. Asthma can exacerbate anxiety and depression, and conversely, mental health issues can worsen asthma symptoms. The availability of mental health resources within the healthcare ecosystem is, therefore, crucial. Does the primary care setting offer on-site mental health services, or are referrals readily available to mental health professionals? The integration of mental health screening and treatment into asthma care would greatly enhance the overall quality of care. The presence of support groups or educational programs focused on managing both asthma and mental health would also be a positive indicator.

Analyzing the availability of pharmacies within the ZIP code is also important. Easy access to pharmacies ensures that patients can readily obtain their asthma medications. The presence of pharmacies that offer specialized asthma medication counseling or medication synchronization programs would further improve the asthma score. The ability to refill prescriptions easily and the availability of a wide range of asthma medications are also key considerations.

The overall asthma score for 17569, and specifically Reinholds, would be determined by weighing these factors. A high score would indicate excellent access to primary care, a favorable physician-to-patient ratio, the presence of specialized asthma care, widespread telemedicine adoption, integrated mental health resources, and readily available pharmacies. A lower score would reflect challenges in one or more of these areas. This analysis needs to be updated frequently to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape.

The data collection process for this analysis would involve several steps. Publicly available data from sources such as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the Pennsylvania Department of Health, and the American Medical Association (AMA) would provide information on physician-to-patient ratios and the location of healthcare providers. Practice websites, patient reviews, and healthcare directories would offer insights into the services offered, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources.

The limitations of this analysis must be acknowledged. The quality and availability of data vary, and some information may be outdated. Patient perspectives, although valuable, are often difficult to quantify. The analysis is also limited by the scope of the available information. Despite these limitations, this analysis provides a valuable starting point for understanding asthma care in 17569 and Reinholds.

To gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in 17569 and Reinholds, including the specific locations of healthcare providers, their services, and the demographics of the patient population, consider utilizing CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a visually intuitive and interactive platform for exploring geographic data, allowing you to identify areas with high asthma prevalence, assess access to care, and make informed decisions about your healthcare needs.