The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 17601, Lancaster, Pennsylvania is 70 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.76 percent of the residents in 17601 has some form of health insurance. 31.11 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 81.70 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 17601 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 12,847 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 16 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 17601. An estimate of 270 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 11,568 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 20,491 health care providers accessible to residents in 17601, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 17601, Lancaster, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 67 |
---|---|
People Score | 30 |
Provider Score | 70 |
Hospital Score | 50 |
Travel Score | 66 |
17601 | Lancaster | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
## Asthma Score Analysis: Lancaster, PA (ZIP Code 17601)
This analysis delves into the landscape of asthma care within Lancaster, Pennsylvania, specifically focusing on the 17601 ZIP code and the broader context of primary care availability in the city. We aim to evaluate the accessibility and quality of care for asthma patients, considering factors such as physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, technology adoption, and the integration of mental health resources. This assessment culminates in a call to action regarding CartoChrome maps, a tool for visualizing and understanding healthcare data.
The prevalence of asthma in Lancaster County mirrors national trends, highlighting the importance of robust healthcare infrastructure to support affected individuals. Analyzing the local healthcare ecosystem requires a multi-faceted approach, starting with the availability of primary care physicians (PCPs). A high concentration of PCPs within a given area generally translates to greater accessibility for patients, including those managing chronic conditions like asthma. However, simply counting the number of doctors is insufficient. We must also consider the patient-to-physician ratio, which offers a more accurate picture of the potential workload and availability of each provider. A lower ratio suggests a greater likelihood of patients receiving timely appointments and personalized care.
In the 17601 ZIP code, the distribution of PCPs and specialists, particularly pulmonologists and allergists, is critical. Proximity to these specialists is paramount for asthma patients, who frequently require specialized diagnostic testing, medication management, and ongoing monitoring. The presence of these specialists within or near the 17601 ZIP code directly impacts the ease of access to comprehensive asthma care. This analysis will attempt to identify specific practices within the area and assess their capacity to serve the needs of asthma patients.
Beyond the raw numbers of physicians, the characteristics of individual practices play a significant role. Some practices may specialize in asthma management, offering dedicated asthma clinics, respiratory therapists, and comprehensive patient education programs. Others may integrate asthma care into their broader primary care services. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to asthma management, evidenced by specialized staff, patient education materials, and adherence to established treatment guidelines, are likely to provide superior care. This assessment will consider the operational aspects of practices, including their approach to patient communication, appointment scheduling, and follow-up care.
Telemedicine adoption is another crucial factor. Telemedicine, including virtual consultations and remote monitoring, has the potential to significantly improve access to care, especially for patients with chronic conditions. It can reduce the need for frequent in-person visits, improve medication adherence, and facilitate timely intervention when symptoms worsen. The degree to which practices in the 17601 ZIP code have embraced telemedicine, including the types of services offered and the ease of access for patients, will be evaluated. Practices offering telehealth options, especially for medication refills, symptom checks, and routine follow-ups, are likely to score higher in this assessment.
Mental health resources are increasingly recognized as an integral part of comprehensive asthma care. The chronic nature of asthma can lead to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Practices that integrate mental health services, either through on-site therapists or referrals to external mental health providers, demonstrate a more holistic approach to patient well-being. The availability of mental health support, including access to therapists, counselors, and support groups, is an important consideration in this analysis.
Identifying standout practices within the 17601 ZIP code is a key objective. These practices may be characterized by a combination of factors, including a low patient-to-physician ratio, specialized asthma services, robust telemedicine adoption, and integrated mental health support. They may also demonstrate a commitment to patient education, providing resources and tools to empower patients to manage their condition effectively. This analysis will attempt to highlight practices that excel in these areas.
The analysis also considers the impact of insurance coverage on access to care. The acceptance of various insurance plans, including Medicaid and Medicare, can significantly affect a patient's ability to receive timely and affordable care. Practices that accept a wide range of insurance plans are likely to be more accessible to a diverse patient population. This analysis will consider the insurance coverage accepted by practices within the 17601 ZIP code.
The overall "Asthma Score" for the 17601 ZIP code will be a composite metric, incorporating these various factors. The score will reflect the overall accessibility, quality, and comprehensiveness of asthma care available within the area. The score will also consider the impact of primary care availability in the broader Lancaster area, as this influences the ability of patients to access initial diagnoses, referrals, and ongoing care. This score is intended to provide a snapshot of the current state of asthma care in the area.
The availability of specialized asthma resources, such as respiratory therapists and asthma educators, will also be considered. These professionals play a crucial role in patient education, medication management, and symptom monitoring. Practices that employ these specialists are likely to provide more comprehensive asthma care.
The analysis will also consider the availability of after-hours care and emergency services. Asthma attacks can occur at any time, and access to timely medical attention is crucial. Practices that offer after-hours care or have clear protocols for managing asthma emergencies are likely to provide better care.
In conclusion, this Asthma Score analysis provides a comprehensive overview of the asthma care landscape within the 17601 ZIP code and the broader context of primary care availability in Lancaster. By considering physician-to-patient ratios, practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and other relevant factors, this analysis aims to provide a clear picture of the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare ecosystem.
To further explore the data and visualize the spatial distribution of healthcare resources, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and patient demographics, we encourage you to utilize CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a powerful tool for understanding the healthcare landscape and making informed decisions about patient care and resource allocation.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like