The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 18014, Bath, Pennsylvania is 89 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 95.88 percent of the residents in 18014 has some form of health insurance. 35.75 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 77.28 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18014 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 2,540 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 30 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18014. An estimate of 91 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 2,599 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 28,705 health care providers accessible to residents in 18014, Bath, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18014, Bath, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 84 |
---|---|
People Score | 26 |
Provider Score | 89 |
Hospital Score | 69 |
Travel Score | 63 |
18014 | Bath | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
The analysis of asthma care within ZIP Code 18014, encompassing the town of Bath, Pennsylvania, necessitates a multifaceted approach. We will delve into the availability and quality of primary care physicians, evaluating their capacity to manage asthma cases effectively. The ultimate goal is to provide an informed perspective on the resources available to residents dealing with this respiratory condition.
Physician-to-patient ratios represent a critical indicator of access to care. Determining the precise ratio within Bath requires examining the total number of primary care physicians (PCPs) actively practicing within the ZIP Code and comparing it to the estimated population. A higher ratio, signifying more patients per physician, can potentially lead to longer wait times for appointments and reduced individual attention. Conversely, a lower ratio suggests greater accessibility. Publicly available data from the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the US Census Bureau will be utilized to ascertain these figures.
Beyond raw numbers, the distribution of PCPs within the community is important. Are they clustered in one area, or are they dispersed throughout the town, making them more accessible to residents regardless of their location? This geographic distribution can significantly impact the ease with which patients can access care, particularly those with limited transportation options. The presence of public transportation, such as local bus routes, should also be factored into the accessibility assessment.
Standout practices within Bath warrant specific attention. Practices that demonstrate a commitment to asthma management, such as those offering specialized asthma education programs or employing certified asthma educators, should be identified. These practices often have a more holistic approach to asthma care, encompassing not only medication management but also patient education on triggers, self-management techniques, and emergency preparedness. Information on these practices can be gleaned from online reviews, patient testimonials, and professional directories.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly relevant in healthcare, particularly in the context of managing chronic conditions like asthma. The availability of telehealth options, such as virtual consultations with PCPs or specialists, can improve access to care, especially for patients with mobility limitations or those living in geographically remote areas. The adoption rate of telemedicine among physicians in Bath needs to be assessed. This includes determining the types of telehealth services offered (e.g., video consultations, remote monitoring) and the extent to which they are utilized by patients.
Mental health resources are often overlooked in asthma management, yet they are crucial. Asthma can be a significant source of stress and anxiety, particularly during exacerbations. The availability of mental health services, such as counseling and support groups, within the community is therefore an important consideration. Assessing the availability of mental health professionals, the presence of support groups, and the integration of mental health services into primary care practices will be important.
The assessment of asthma care in Bath must also consider the availability of specialist care. While PCPs are often the first point of contact for asthma management, patients with more severe or complex cases may require referral to a pulmonologist or allergist. The proximity of these specialists, the ease of referral processes, and the wait times for appointments with specialists are all critical factors in the overall quality of asthma care.
The quality of asthma care is also dependent on the availability of diagnostic tools. The presence of spirometry equipment in primary care practices is crucial for accurate diagnosis and monitoring of asthma. The availability of other diagnostic tests, such as allergy testing, can also aid in identifying triggers and developing personalized treatment plans.
The utilization of electronic health records (EHRs) is another important factor. EHRs can facilitate communication between healthcare providers, improve medication management, and enable the tracking of patient outcomes. The extent to which practices in Bath have adopted EHRs and the interoperability of these systems are important considerations.
The level of patient education is a vital component of effective asthma management. Practices that provide patients with comprehensive education on asthma triggers, medication use, and self-management techniques are more likely to achieve positive patient outcomes. Assessing the availability of educational materials, the frequency of patient education sessions, and the use of patient-friendly language are all important aspects of this evaluation.
The cost of healthcare is always a major concern for patients. The affordability of asthma medications, the availability of financial assistance programs, and the acceptance of various insurance plans by local practices are all important factors to consider. The cost of specialist consultations and diagnostic tests also needs to be factored into the overall assessment.
Finally, the overall satisfaction of patients with the asthma care they receive is a crucial indicator of quality. Gathering feedback from patients through surveys, interviews, or online reviews can provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the local healthcare system. This patient feedback can be used to identify areas for improvement and to inform future healthcare planning efforts.
In conclusion, evaluating asthma care in Bath, Pennsylvania, requires a comprehensive approach. By examining physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, mental health resources, and other relevant factors, a more complete picture of the healthcare landscape emerges. This detailed analysis can empower residents of Bath to make informed decisions about their healthcare and advocate for improvements in asthma care within their community.
To visualize the geographic distribution of physicians, healthcare facilities, and other relevant data points within ZIP Code 18014, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer a powerful way to visualize the data discussed in this analysis, helping you to better understand the accessibility of care and identify potential areas for improvement.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like