The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 18091, Wind Gap, Pennsylvania is 96 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 94.96 percent of the residents in 18091 has some form of health insurance. 31.33 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 79.50 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18091 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 1,348 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 31 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18091. An estimate of 40 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 1,009 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 30,193 health care providers accessible to residents in 18091, Wind Gap, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18091, Wind Gap, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 88 |
---|---|
People Score | 40 |
Provider Score | 96 |
Hospital Score | 64 |
Travel Score | 56 |
18091 | Wind Gap | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing asthma care within ZIP Code 18091, encompassing Wind Gap, Pennsylvania, requires a multifaceted approach. This analysis will delve into various factors, from physician-to-patient ratios to the availability of mental health resources, to provide a comprehensive asthma score assessment. The goal is to understand the strengths and weaknesses of the current healthcare landscape and identify areas for improvement.
The initial step involves assessing the physician-to-patient ratio. A low ratio, indicating a scarcity of primary care physicians (PCPs), can significantly impact asthma management. Patients may face longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying crucial treatment adjustments or exacerbation management. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility, allowing for more frequent check-ups and proactive care. Data from sources like the Pennsylvania Department of Health and the US Census Bureau will be crucial in determining the exact ratio within the specified ZIP code. This data should be cross-referenced with information on specialist availability, particularly pulmonologists and allergists, who are essential for comprehensive asthma care.
Beyond the raw numbers, the quality of care is paramount. Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several criteria. Are the practices equipped with the latest diagnostic tools, such as spirometry? Do they adhere to established asthma guidelines, such as those published by the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP)? Practices demonstrating a commitment to patient education, including inhaler technique training and asthma action plan development, should be recognized. Reviews from patients, accessible through online platforms and patient satisfaction surveys, provide valuable insights into the patient experience. Practices consistently receiving positive feedback regarding communication, empathy, and responsiveness to patient needs should be considered high-performing.
Telemedicine adoption is another critical factor. In a rural area like Wind Gap, telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, improving access to care, particularly for follow-up appointments and medication management. Practices utilizing telehealth platforms for virtual consultations, remote monitoring of lung function, and educational sessions deserve recognition. The accessibility of these platforms, including ease of use and availability to patients with limited technological literacy, is also important. Practices offering telehealth services should be assessed based on their ability to integrate these services seamlessly into their existing workflows and ensure patient data privacy and security.
The interconnectedness of physical and mental health necessitates an evaluation of mental health resources. Asthma, a chronic condition, can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. The availability of mental health professionals, such as therapists and counselors, within the Wind Gap area is crucial. Practices that integrate mental health screening into their asthma management protocols and offer referrals to mental health services should be highly regarded. Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals can provide comprehensive, holistic care, addressing both the physical and psychological aspects of asthma.
Assessing primary care availability in Wind Gap requires examining the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code. Are there sufficient practices to serve the population? Are these practices accepting new patients? The proximity of these practices to residential areas is also important, particularly for patients with mobility limitations or those reliant on public transportation. Data on insurance acceptance, including participation in Medicaid and Medicare, is crucial, as it directly impacts access to care for vulnerable populations. Furthermore, an analysis of after-hours care availability, including urgent care clinics and emergency room access, is essential for managing asthma exacerbations.
The asthma score for doctors in 18091, and primary care availability in Wind Gap, will be based on a weighted average of these factors. Physician-to-patient ratios, quality of care, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resource integration will all contribute to the final score. Practices demonstrating excellence in multiple areas will receive higher scores. The goal is to provide a nuanced assessment, highlighting both strengths and weaknesses, and informing patients about the best options for asthma care in the area. The final score should be easily understandable and actionable, empowering patients to make informed decisions about their healthcare.
The analysis should also consider the impact of social determinants of health. Factors such as socioeconomic status, housing quality, and environmental conditions can significantly influence asthma outcomes. Practices located in areas with high rates of poverty or exposure to environmental pollutants may face additional challenges in managing asthma. Addressing these factors requires a collaborative approach, involving healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government agencies. The asthma score should reflect the efforts of practices to address these challenges, such as providing resources for patients struggling with housing or food insecurity.
The analysis should also incorporate data on asthma prevalence rates within the ZIP code. This data, obtained from sources like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, can provide valuable context for the assessment. High asthma prevalence rates may indicate a greater need for specialized care and community-based interventions. The analysis should also examine the demographics of the asthma population, including age, race, and ethnicity. This information can help identify disparities in care and inform targeted interventions to address the needs of specific populations.
The final asthma score should be presented in a clear and concise format, allowing for easy comparison between practices. This may involve using a rating system, such as a star rating or a numerical score. The analysis should also include a summary of the findings, highlighting the key strengths and weaknesses of the healthcare landscape in Wind Gap. This summary should be accessible to both patients and healthcare providers, promoting transparency and accountability. The analysis should be regularly updated to reflect changes in the healthcare landscape, ensuring that the information remains current and relevant.
The analysis of asthma care in Wind Gap, and the resulting Asthma Score, is a complex undertaking. However, it is a crucial step towards improving the quality of care and ensuring that all patients with asthma have access to the resources they need to manage their condition effectively. The ultimate goal is to empower patients to take control of their health and live fulfilling lives.
If you want to visualize the data, explore the geographic distribution of healthcare resources, and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare landscape in Wind Gap, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps offer an interactive and insightful way to explore the data and make informed decisions.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like