The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 18451, Paupack, Pennsylvania is 21 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 98.93 percent of the residents in 18451 has some form of health insurance. 44.82 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 88.93 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18451 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 78 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 1 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18451. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 233 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 1,481 health care providers accessible to residents in 18451, Paupack, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18451, Paupack, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 63 |
---|---|
People Score | 89 |
Provider Score | 21 |
Hospital Score | 71 |
Travel Score | 30 |
18451 | Paupack | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing asthma care within ZIP Code 18451, encompassing the Paupack region, requires a multifaceted approach. Assessing physician availability, especially primary care providers (PCPs), is crucial, as they often serve as the first point of contact for asthma management. This analysis will delve into the current landscape, considering physician-to-patient ratios, standout practices, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health resources, all factors influencing an "Asthma Score" for the area.
The physician-to-patient ratio offers a preliminary indication of access. Paupack, being a more rural area, may face challenges in this regard. A low ratio, indicating fewer physicians per capita, could lead to longer wait times for appointments and potentially delayed diagnosis or treatment. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests greater accessibility. Precise data on physician counts within the 18451 ZIP code is essential. Publicly available resources, such as the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), can provide estimates, but local data is more definitive. Local hospitals, such as Wayne Memorial Hospital, and their associated clinics are important sources of information.
Identifying standout practices is vital. These are clinics or individual physicians demonstrating excellence in asthma management. Criteria for evaluation could include: adherence to national guidelines (e.g., those from the National Institutes of Health), patient outcomes (e.g., reduced asthma exacerbations, improved lung function), patient satisfaction scores, and the availability of specialized asthma education programs. Practices employing certified asthma educators (CAEs) would likely rank higher. Furthermore, practices that actively monitor and manage patients’ asthma control levels, using tools like peak flow meters and asthma action plans, would be considered exemplary.
Telemedicine adoption is a critical factor in asthma care, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can bridge geographical barriers, allowing patients to access care remotely. This includes virtual consultations, medication management, and remote monitoring of lung function. Practices actively utilizing telemedicine platforms, offering virtual asthma education sessions, and providing remote monitoring devices would receive a higher score. The availability of secure and HIPAA-compliant platforms is essential for ensuring patient privacy and data security. The ability to integrate these platforms with electronic health records (EHRs) further streamlines care.
The integration of mental health resources into asthma care is increasingly recognized as essential. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's mental well-being, leading to anxiety, depression, and reduced quality of life. Practices that recognize this and offer, or have readily available referrals to, mental health services would be considered more comprehensive. This could include on-site therapists, partnerships with mental health professionals, or the integration of mental health screening tools into routine asthma checkups. The ability to address the psychological aspects of asthma is critical for holistic patient care.
The overall "Asthma Score" for doctors in ZIP Code 18451 and primary care availability in Paupack would be a composite score, reflecting the various factors discussed. A higher score would indicate better access to care, more effective management strategies, and a more patient-centered approach. The score could be broken down into sub-scores for physician availability, practice quality, telemedicine adoption, and mental health integration. The weighting of each factor would depend on its relative importance in influencing asthma outcomes.
Assessing primary care availability specifically is critical. PCPs often serve as the initial point of contact for asthma patients. Their ability to provide timely diagnosis, initiate appropriate treatment, and coordinate care with specialists (e.g., pulmonologists, allergists) significantly impacts patient outcomes. The number of PCPs actively practicing within the 18451 ZIP code, the average patient load per PCP, and the availability of same-day or next-day appointments are all important considerations.
Further analysis would involve examining the insurance acceptance of local practices. Accepting a wide range of insurance plans, including Medicaid and Medicare, ensures that care is accessible to a broader population. Practices that offer sliding-scale fees or financial assistance programs would also be viewed favorably. The ability to navigate the complexities of insurance coverage and assist patients in accessing affordable medications is a key component of effective asthma care.
The availability of specialized asthma care, such as pulmonologists and allergists, is also a significant factor. While PCPs provide initial care, specialists are often needed for complex cases or for managing severe asthma. The proximity of specialists, the ease of referral processes, and the ability of specialists to coordinate care with PCPs are all important considerations. The presence of a dedicated asthma clinic or center within the region would significantly enhance the "Asthma Score."
Another important aspect is patient education. Practices that prioritize patient education, providing patients with the knowledge and skills they need to manage their asthma effectively, would be ranked higher. This includes education on medication use, trigger avoidance, asthma action plans, and the proper use of inhalers and other devices. The availability of educational materials in multiple languages would also be a positive factor, reflecting a commitment to serving a diverse patient population.
Finally, community outreach and engagement are important. Practices that actively participate in community health initiatives, such as asthma awareness programs or free asthma screenings, demonstrate a commitment to improving the overall health of the community. Partnering with local schools, community centers, and other organizations can help to raise awareness about asthma and provide resources to those who need them.
To visualize and analyze the data related to asthma care in the Paupack region, including physician locations, practice characteristics, and access to resources, consider using CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome provides powerful mapping and data visualization tools that can help you gain valuable insights into the local healthcare landscape.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like