The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 18616, Forksville, Pennsylvania is 64 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 84.84 percent of the residents in 18616 has some form of health insurance. 49.28 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 58.56 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18616 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 98 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18616. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 222 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 173 health care providers accessible to residents in 18616, Forksville, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18616, Forksville, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 78 |
---|---|
People Score | 91 |
Provider Score | 64 |
Hospital Score | 61 |
Travel Score | 18 |
18616 | Forksville | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Asthma management in Forksville, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 18616), presents a unique challenge, given its rural setting and potential limitations in healthcare access. To assess the quality of asthma care, we'll analyze key factors impacting patient outcomes, ultimately assigning an “Asthma Score” reflecting the overall effectiveness of care delivery. This score will consider physician availability, practice characteristics, technological integration, and the availability of supporting mental health resources, all within the context of Forksville’s specific healthcare landscape.
The physician-to-patient ratio is a crucial indicator. In a rural area like Forksville, a low ratio can significantly impede timely access to care. Ideally, the Asthma Score would be higher if the ratio is favorable. A higher ratio suggests that patients may face longer wait times for appointments, potentially delaying diagnosis, treatment adjustments, and exacerbation management. Data regarding the precise physician-to-patient ratio in Forksville is difficult to ascertain without access to proprietary healthcare databases. However, we can infer from publicly available information that rural areas generally face a shortage of primary care physicians. This scarcity is a significant detriment to asthma care, as primary care physicians are often the first point of contact for patients experiencing symptoms.
Primary care availability is a cornerstone of effective asthma management. Regular check-ups with a primary care physician allow for proactive monitoring of lung function, medication adherence, and environmental triggers. The accessibility of these services directly influences the Asthma Score. If primary care physicians are readily available, with short wait times and convenient appointment scheduling, the score increases. Conversely, if patients must travel long distances or face extended delays to see a doctor, the score suffers. The presence of specialized pulmonologists, though not necessarily located within Forksville itself, is also a positive factor. Access to specialists for complex cases or diagnostic procedures elevates the overall quality of care.
Examining the characteristics of local medical practices is essential. Practices that prioritize asthma management, offering specialized services like pulmonary function testing (PFTs) or asthma education programs, warrant a higher Asthma Score. The presence of certified asthma educators within a practice can significantly improve patient outcomes by empowering individuals to manage their condition effectively. The availability of after-hours care or urgent care facilities is also critical, as asthma exacerbations can occur at any time. Practices with a strong commitment to patient education and support, including providing written action plans and offering resources for managing triggers, are likely to achieve better patient outcomes.
Telemedicine adoption is rapidly transforming healthcare delivery, and its impact on asthma management is substantial. Practices that embrace telemedicine, offering virtual consultations and remote monitoring, can improve access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas. Telemedicine allows physicians to remotely assess patients' symptoms, adjust medications, and provide education, reducing the need for frequent in-person visits. The Asthma Score benefits from the availability and utilization of telemedicine services. Practices that have successfully integrated telemedicine into their asthma care protocols are better positioned to provide timely and convenient care.
The often-overlooked aspect of mental health resources plays a significant role in asthma management. Asthma can be a chronic and stressful condition, and anxiety and depression can exacerbate symptoms and negatively impact quality of life. The availability of mental health services, either within the primary care practice or through referrals, significantly improves the Asthma Score. Practices that recognize the importance of mental health and provide access to counseling, support groups, or other mental health resources are better equipped to address the holistic needs of their patients.
To synthesize these factors into a comprehensive Asthma Score, we would consider a weighted approach. The physician-to-patient ratio and primary care availability would carry significant weight, reflecting their fundamental importance. Practice characteristics, telemedicine adoption, and mental health resources would also be weighted, albeit to a lesser degree. The specific weights would be determined based on the relative importance of each factor in influencing patient outcomes.
The final Asthma Score would be a numerical value, allowing for a comparative assessment of asthma care quality in Forksville. A higher score would indicate a more favorable healthcare environment, with better access to care, comprehensive services, and a strong emphasis on patient education and support. A lower score would highlight areas for improvement, such as addressing physician shortages, expanding telemedicine services, and integrating mental health resources.
Assessing asthma care in Forksville requires a nuanced understanding of the local healthcare landscape. The challenges of rural healthcare, including physician shortages and limited access to specialized services, must be carefully considered. The Asthma Score provides a framework for evaluating the quality of care and identifying areas for improvement. It is a dynamic measure that should be continuously updated to reflect changes in the healthcare environment.
To gain a more detailed understanding of the healthcare resources available in Forksville, including the location of medical practices, the availability of specialists, and the presence of telemedicine services, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. These maps provide a visual representation of healthcare data, allowing you to identify potential gaps in care and assess the accessibility of services in the area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like