18812, Brackney, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 18812, Brackney, Pennsylvania is 12 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 92.39 percent of the residents in 18812 has some form of health insurance. 45.40 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 66.56 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18812 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 202 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18812. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 396 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 256 health care providers accessible to residents in 18812, Brackney, Pennsylvania.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Doctors in ZIP Code 18812 and Primary Care Availability in Brackney

Analyzing healthcare accessibility and quality requires a multi-faceted approach, especially when focusing on a specific condition like asthma within a defined geographic area. This analysis examines the availability and quality of primary care physicians (PCPs) in Brackney, Pennsylvania, and the resources available to asthma patients within ZIP code 18812, offering an “Asthma Score” assessment based on key factors. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape for asthma sufferers in this region.

The foundation of asthma management rests on accessible and effective primary care. In Brackney, the availability of PCPs directly impacts the ability of asthma patients to receive timely diagnoses, medication management, and ongoing monitoring. A low PCP-to-population ratio indicates potential challenges in accessing care, leading to delayed treatment and increased risk of asthma exacerbations. Conversely, a higher ratio, coupled with convenient appointment scheduling and extended office hours, suggests a more supportive environment for asthma patients.

Evaluating the quality of primary care involves assessing several elements. Does the practice offer comprehensive asthma education? Are patients provided with personalized asthma action plans? Do physicians adhere to established asthma treatment guidelines? The presence of specialized asthma clinics or respiratory therapists within a practice significantly enhances the quality of care. Furthermore, the integration of electronic health records (EHRs) allows for better coordination of care, improved medication adherence, and the ability to track patient progress over time.

Telemedicine adoption plays a crucial role in modern healthcare delivery, especially for managing chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine offers several advantages, including remote monitoring of symptoms, virtual consultations, and convenient medication refills. Practices that have embraced telemedicine demonstrate a commitment to patient convenience and proactive care. The availability of telehealth services can be particularly beneficial for patients in rural areas, reducing the need for travel and ensuring access to care during emergencies.

Mental health is inextricably linked to physical health, and asthma patients are no exception. Anxiety and depression are common comorbidities in individuals with asthma, exacerbating symptoms and impacting quality of life. The availability of mental health resources within primary care practices or through referrals is a critical component of comprehensive asthma management. Practices that screen for mental health conditions and provide access to counseling or psychiatric services demonstrate a holistic approach to patient care.

Within ZIP code 18812, identifying standout practices requires a deeper dive into the specific characteristics of each provider. Examining patient reviews, assessing the range of services offered, and evaluating the integration of technology are essential. Practices that prioritize patient education, provide personalized asthma action plans, and offer readily accessible care are likely to achieve higher “Asthma Score” ratings. Furthermore, the presence of bilingual staff can improve access to care for non-English speaking patients.

The physician-to-patient ratio in 18812 must be examined. A low ratio may indicate a shortage of PCPs, potentially leading to longer wait times for appointments and reduced access to care. Conversely, a higher ratio suggests a more accessible healthcare environment. Analyzing the distribution of PCPs within the ZIP code, including their geographic proximity to patients, is also important.

The “Asthma Score” for a specific practice should consider the practice’s commitment to asthma education. This includes providing patients with clear information about their condition, triggers, medications, and self-management techniques. Practices that offer educational materials, group classes, or individual counseling on asthma management receive higher scores.

The adoption of EHRs is a significant factor in the “Asthma Score” assessment. EHRs facilitate better communication between healthcare providers, improve medication management, and enable the tracking of patient outcomes. Practices that have fully implemented EHRs demonstrate a commitment to efficient and coordinated care.

The availability of after-hours care is another critical factor. Asthma symptoms can worsen at any time, and patients need access to care when they need it most. Practices that offer extended office hours, on-call physicians, or partnerships with urgent care facilities receive higher scores.

Evaluating the mental health resources available to asthma patients is crucial. Practices that screen for mental health conditions, offer counseling services, or provide referrals to mental health professionals receive higher scores. Addressing the psychological aspects of asthma is essential for improving patient outcomes.

The “Asthma Score” should also consider the practice’s approach to patient communication. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, provide clear and concise communication, and respond promptly to patient inquiries receive higher scores.

Finally, the “Asthma Score” should consider the practice’s commitment to continuous improvement. Practices that actively monitor patient outcomes, solicit patient feedback, and implement changes based on this information demonstrate a commitment to providing the best possible care.

The overall “Asthma Score” for ZIP code 18812 and the primary care availability in Brackney will depend on the aggregation of these factors. A high score indicates a healthcare environment that is supportive of asthma patients, with accessible, high-quality care. A low score suggests areas for improvement, such as increasing the number of PCPs, improving access to mental health resources, and promoting telemedicine adoption.

By analyzing these factors, we can gain a comprehensive understanding of the healthcare landscape for asthma patients in this region. This information can be used to identify areas of strength and weakness, and to inform strategies for improving asthma care.

To further explore the healthcare landscape in ZIP code 18812 and Brackney, including the locations of practices, physician-to-patient ratios, and other relevant data, we encourage you to utilize CartoChrome maps. CartoChrome maps provide a visually engaging and interactive way to explore geographic data, allowing you to identify healthcare resources and assess accessibility in the area.