The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 18834, New Milford, Pennsylvania is 18 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.
An estimate of 92.33 percent of the residents in 18834 has some form of health insurance. 43.73 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 64.92 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 18834 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.
For the 695 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 0 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 18834. An estimate of 0 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 724 residents over the age of 65 years.
In a 20-mile radius, there are 161 health care providers accessible to residents in 18834, New Milford, Pennsylvania.
Health Scores in 18834, New Milford, Pennsylvania
Asthma Score | 11 |
---|---|
People Score | 35 |
Provider Score | 18 |
Hospital Score | 36 |
Travel Score | 34 |
18834 | New Milford | Pennsylvania | |
---|---|---|---|
Providers per 10,000 residents | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Pediatricians per 10,000 residents under 18 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Geriatricians per 10,000 residents over 65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Analyzing the landscape of asthma care in New Milford, Pennsylvania (ZIP code 18834) necessitates a multifaceted approach. This analysis will examine physician-to-patient ratios, highlight standout practices, assess telemedicine adoption, and evaluate the availability of mental health resources, all within the context of asthma management. The goal is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the resources available to asthma patients in this specific geographic area.
The initial challenge lies in accurately determining the physician-to-patient ratio. Publicly available data, such as the US Census Bureau and the Pennsylvania Department of Health, provides population estimates. However, pinpointing the exact number of primary care physicians (PCPs) and pulmonologists actively practicing within the 18834 ZIP code requires more granular data. This often necessitates cross-referencing information from medical licensing boards, insurance provider directories, and potentially even contacting local healthcare facilities directly. A low physician-to-patient ratio, particularly for specialists like pulmonologists, can indicate potential access barriers to timely and specialized asthma care.
Primary care availability is a critical factor. PCPs serve as the first point of contact for many asthma patients, providing initial diagnoses, treatment plans, and ongoing management. The presence of a robust primary care network, including family medicine and internal medicine practices, is crucial. Assessing the availability involves considering factors like appointment wait times, acceptance of various insurance plans, and the overall patient load of each practice. Practices with shorter wait times and broader insurance coverage are generally more accessible to a wider patient population.
Identifying standout practices involves evaluating several key metrics. One crucial aspect is the use of evidence-based asthma management guidelines. Practices that consistently adhere to these guidelines, as recommended by organizations like the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), often demonstrate better patient outcomes. Another important factor is patient education. Asthma is a chronic condition that requires active patient participation in their own care. Practices that provide comprehensive patient education on topics like medication adherence, trigger avoidance, and proper inhaler technique are likely to see improved patient control of their asthma.
Telemedicine adoption has become increasingly relevant, particularly in rural areas like New Milford. Telemedicine offers the potential to improve access to care by reducing the need for in-person visits, especially for routine follow-ups or medication adjustments. Assessing the extent of telemedicine adoption involves determining which practices offer virtual consultations, the types of services offered remotely (e.g., medication refills, symptom monitoring), and the technology platforms used. Practices that have embraced telemedicine can potentially provide more convenient and accessible care for asthma patients.
The integration of mental health resources into asthma care is often overlooked, yet it is vital. Asthma can significantly impact a patient’s quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and other mental health challenges. Assessing the availability of mental health resources involves identifying practices that offer on-site counseling services or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals. Practices that recognize the link between asthma and mental health and proactively address these needs are better equipped to provide holistic patient care.
To provide a comprehensive 'Asthma Score' analysis, each of these factors needs to be quantified and weighted appropriately. For example, physician-to-patient ratios could be assigned a score based on the number of physicians per 1,000 residents. Primary care availability could be scored based on appointment wait times, insurance acceptance, and patient load. Standout practices could be evaluated based on their adherence to asthma guidelines, patient education efforts, and patient satisfaction scores. Telemedicine adoption could be scored based on the types of services offered remotely and the technology platforms used. Finally, mental health resource availability could be scored based on the presence of on-site counseling or referral pathways.
The final 'Asthma Score' would be a composite score, reflecting the overall quality and accessibility of asthma care in the 18834 ZIP code. This score would be a valuable tool for patients seeking care, healthcare providers looking to improve their services, and policymakers aiming to address healthcare disparities.
The analysis requires a deep dive into the local healthcare landscape. It involves gathering data from multiple sources, including public health agencies, insurance providers, and local healthcare facilities. The accuracy of the analysis depends on the completeness and reliability of the data collected.
The presence of a strong primary care network is fundamental. This network should be easily accessible, accepting a variety of insurance plans, and offering timely appointments. A well-functioning primary care system provides the foundation for effective asthma management.
The adoption of telemedicine is essential for improving access to care, especially in rural areas. Telemedicine can reduce travel time, improve convenience, and facilitate more frequent follow-up appointments. Practices that have embraced telemedicine are better positioned to serve their patients.
Mental health resources are also critical. Asthma can have a significant impact on mental well-being. Practices that offer on-site counseling or have established referral pathways to mental health professionals are better equipped to provide holistic patient care.
The analysis should also consider the availability of specialist care, such as pulmonologists. A low physician-to-patient ratio for specialists can indicate potential access barriers to timely and specialized asthma care.
The overall goal is to provide a clear and concise assessment of the quality and accessibility of asthma care in the 18834 ZIP code. This assessment should be useful for patients, healthcare providers, and policymakers alike.
To visualize and understand the spatial distribution of these factors, consider using interactive mapping tools. CartoChrome maps can provide a dynamic and informative view of the healthcare landscape in New Milford. Explore the potential of CartoChrome maps to gain deeper insights into the availability of asthma care resources in your area.
Reviews
No reviews yet.
You may also like