19061, Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania Asthma Score Provider Score

The Provider Score for the Asthma Score in 19061, Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania is 100 when comparing 34,000 ZIP Codes in the United States.

An estimate of 94.26 percent of the residents in 19061 has some form of health insurance. 36.56 percent of the residents have some type of public health insurance like Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Affairs (VA), or TRICARE. About 71.60 percent of the residents have private health insurance, either through their employer or direct purchase. Military veterans should know that percent of the residents in the ZIP Code of 19061 have VA health insurance. Also, percent of the residents receive TRICARE.

For the 4,775 residents under the age of 18, there is an estimate of 392 pediatricians in a 20-mile radius of 19061. An estimate of 82 geriatricians or physicians who focus on the elderly who can serve the 3,423 residents over the age of 65 years.

In a 20-mile radius, there are 77,470 health care providers accessible to residents in 19061, Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania.

## Asthma Score Analysis: Marcus Hook, PA (ZIP Code 19061)

Analyzing the asthma care landscape in Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania (ZIP Code 19061) requires a multi-faceted approach, considering factors beyond just the presence of physicians. This analysis assesses primary care availability, physician-to-patient ratios, the integration of telemedicine, and the accessibility of mental health resources, all crucial components in managing asthma effectively. This analysis will serve as an 'Asthma Score' assessment.

Marcus Hook, a small borough in Delaware County, faces unique challenges. It's a community with a history of industrial activity, potentially impacting air quality and, consequently, asthma prevalence. Understanding the availability of quality healthcare resources is paramount for residents managing this chronic respiratory condition.

Primary care availability is the cornerstone of asthma management. Regular check-ups, medication management, and patient education are all primarily handled by primary care physicians (PCPs). Assessing the PCP density within the 19061 ZIP code and its immediate surrounding areas provides a crucial starting point. Data from healthcare directories and insurance provider networks can be analyzed to determine the number of practicing PCPs. Furthermore, the patient-to-physician ratio is a vital metric. A high ratio suggests potential difficulties in accessing timely appointments and comprehensive care. Comparing the ratio in Marcus Hook to county and state averages offers a valuable benchmark.

While a precise physician-to-patient ratio is difficult to ascertain without specific data, the limited size of Marcus Hook suggests that residents may rely on primary care practices located outside the borough. This necessitates evaluating the ease of access to these practices, considering factors like transportation options and travel times. Public transportation accessibility, especially for individuals with respiratory difficulties, becomes a significant consideration.

Beyond simple numbers, the quality of primary care is critical. Identifying standout practices within or near 19061 requires evaluating their approach to asthma management. This includes assessing their use of evidence-based guidelines, their patient education programs, and their communication strategies. Practices that actively engage patients in their care, provide clear instructions, and offer readily available support are likely to achieve better patient outcomes. Reviews from patients, though often subjective, can provide valuable insights into patient experiences and satisfaction levels.

Telemedicine adoption has dramatically reshaped healthcare delivery, especially for chronic conditions like asthma. Telemedicine offers several advantages, including convenient follow-up appointments, medication refills, and remote monitoring of symptoms. Evaluating the adoption of telemedicine by primary care practices in and around Marcus Hook is crucial. Practices that offer virtual consultations and remote monitoring tools can improve patient access to care, particularly for those with mobility limitations or transportation challenges. The availability of remote monitoring devices, such as peak flow meters that transmit data to the physician, represents a significant advancement in asthma management.

Mental health resources are another crucial element of asthma care. Asthma can significantly impact a patient's quality of life, leading to anxiety, depression, and stress. Evaluating the availability of mental health services within the community is essential. This includes assessing the presence of therapists, counselors, and psychiatrists who are familiar with the psychological aspects of chronic respiratory illnesses. Collaboration between primary care physicians and mental health professionals is ideal, ensuring a holistic approach to patient care. The integration of mental health screenings and referrals into asthma management protocols is a positive indicator of a well-rounded healthcare system.

Specific practices within the area may stand out. Identifying these practices requires a deeper dive into their operational details. This includes analyzing their staffing models, their use of electronic health records (EHRs), and their patient education materials. Practices that prioritize patient education, offer multilingual services, and actively engage with community health initiatives are likely to be more effective in managing asthma within the diverse population of Marcus Hook. Examining their asthma action plans, which are individualized plans created by doctors for patients to follow, can be a key indicator of how they manage the condition.

The 'Asthma Score' for Marcus Hook, PA (19061) is not simply a number but a composite assessment reflecting the availability, accessibility, and quality of asthma-related healthcare resources. It considers physician density, patient-to-physician ratios, telemedicine adoption, and the integration of mental health support. The score would ideally be determined by a weighted average of these factors, with each component contributing to the overall assessment. The higher the score, the more robust the asthma care landscape.

To improve the 'Asthma Score', Marcus Hook could benefit from initiatives that enhance primary care access, promote telemedicine adoption, and strengthen the integration of mental health services. Community outreach programs focused on asthma education and awareness can also improve patient outcomes. Collaboration between healthcare providers, community organizations, and local government is essential to creating a supportive environment for individuals with asthma.

Further analysis could incorporate air quality data and socioeconomic factors. The prevalence of asthma is often correlated with environmental factors and social determinants of health. Mapping these factors in relation to healthcare resource availability can provide a more comprehensive understanding of the challenges and opportunities in asthma management within the community.

For a visual representation of this data and a deeper dive into the geographical distribution of healthcare resources, consider exploring CartoChrome maps. Their interactive mapping tools can provide valuable insights into the spatial relationships between healthcare providers, patient populations, and environmental factors, ultimately contributing to a more informed and effective approach to asthma management in Marcus Hook and beyond.